| Poster | Thread |
Al4
|  |
Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 31-Dec-2008 23:18:42
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2008 Posts: 339
From: Unknown | | |
|
| What are the pros and cons of each in your eyes? To me they all have their weaknesses and various pros.
Windows is heavy, expensive...
Linux is complicated
Mac is expensive
Amiga doesn't have all popular technologies yet eg Flash
Last edited by Al4 on 31-Dec-2008 at 11:19 PM.
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 31-Dec-2008 23:28:11
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @Al4
Quote:
| Windows is heavy, expensive... |
Hanging on to XP here, works fine as a gaming platform. Heavy, yes, but dunno if it is that expensive, especially if you buy a bundle with pc with Windows included.
Quote:
Dunno if it is that complicated, try Knoppix and everything works "out of the box".
Quote:
Yes, but so is Amiga. Anyway, imho OSX is quite "boring". Very good and stable desktop OS, but boring if you are used to Linux 
Quote:
| Amiga doesn't have all popular technologies yet eg Flash |
Yes, Amiga lacks Java, good Flash, and, and, but the OS is fun though  _________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 31-Dec-2008 23:36:15
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| @Al4 This has been done to death in many threads, but:
Amiga doesn't have: remotely modern hardware remotely sanely priced hardware decent graphics support or drivers USB2 firewire BlueRay hardware with gigabit ethernet (there is an alpha driver out there on OS4Depot, though)
A browser than can compare favorably to FireFox, Safari, Konqueror etc (better than it used to be, but, still valid) Any Office software that's compatible with what is sadly but truly, the only standard that matters - MS Office, nor OpenOffice port. Ability to play DivX AFAIK Reasonably decent DVD authoring software IM client that can compare well to pidgin or Adium. Proper VOIP/SIP client Java Eclipse Modern image editing software Non linear video editing software Any modern games whatsoever, except for a small handful of ok SDL titles, or Battle of Wesnoth (SDL game, but very nice game) modern apache, php, MySQL, Samba, etc. SMP - virtually every system sold today has multiple CPU cores, excepting netbooks and embedded use. no can do today on AOS.
More importantly, the majority of things that *have* been ported to OS4, most people don't manage to merge the changes back into the code's mainline, so we generally get some one-off ports that are old, never picking up fixes from the main codebase (like apache, MySQL, etc).
There's a 'start,' anyways.
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
fairlanefastback
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 1-Jan-2009 0:01:14
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| @Al4
Windows is not that expensive I don't think.
Linux Mint ( http://www.linuxmint.com/ ) is not that complicated.
Amiga is the most expensive of all PLUS as you say its missing many essential technologies. Amiga has nothing going for it in the mainstream at the moment. Its in hobby OS territory only right now. Last edited by fairlanefastback on 01-Jan-2009 at 12:01 AM.
_________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200 |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomas
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 2-Jan-2009 15:02:38
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Jul-2003 Posts: 4286
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @wegster I agree with many of your points, but we do have usb2 now. The sam has usb2 and someone recently released a usb2 card for the classic as well. I also think we are getting near to having a modern browser. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 2-Jan-2009 15:37:35
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11351
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @tomazkid
Quote:
| Anyway, imho OSX is quite "boring". Very good and stable desktop OS, but boring if you are used to Linux |
When I open the Terminal it looks like Linux. But the editing is a but crappy. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 2-Jan-2009 15:52:46
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11351
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @wegster
Quote:
So just chucking in a BlueRay drive won't enable us to read them? It was too good to good to be true when the same worked for my OS3.9 A1200 when I plugged in a DVD ROM drive on the SCSI bus. Could read DVD's straight away.  |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 2-Jan-2009 17:42:48
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| @Tomas
Quote:
Tomas wrote: @wegster I agree with many of your points, but we do have usb2 now. The sam has usb2 and someone recently released a usb2 card for the classic as well. I also think we are getting near to having a modern browser. |
Working with OS4?
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 2-Jan-2009 17:43:52
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| @Hypex
Quote:
Hypex wrote: @tomazkid
Quote:
| Anyway, imho OSX is quite "boring". Very good and stable desktop OS, but boring if you are used to Linux |
When I open the Terminal it looks like Linux. But the editing is a but crappy. |
Replace OSX terminal with iTerm, much better.
Then use macPorts/DarwinPorts to install whatever you'd like from GNU/free software base.
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 2-Jan-2009 17:45:58
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| @Hypex
Quote:
Hypex wrote: @wegster
Quote:
So just chucking in a BlueRay drive won't enable us to read them? It was too good to good to be true when the same worked for my OS3.9 A1200 when I plugged in a DVD ROM drive on the SCSI bus. Could read DVD's straight away.  |
Not positive, but it certainly can't handle any DRM protected content, like the main media distributed on BD - movies. mplayer might read/display non protected BD content, but seeing as there have been some CD/DVD drives OS4 hasn't been happy with, I wouldn't be buying a BD player to plug into an OS4 machine without confirming for certain if it will be anything more than an expensive paperweight.
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Blaine
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 8:21:58
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 19-Jan-2004 Posts: 49
From: Vernon BC, Canada | | |
|
| @Hypex
Quote:
Hypex wrote: @tomazkid
Quote:
| Anyway, imho OSX is quite "boring". Very good and stable desktop OS, but boring if you are used to Linux |
When I open the Terminal it looks like Linux. But the editing is a but crappy. |
It looks like Linux because OSX is built on Unix, making modern Macs Unix machines. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
opi
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 11:18:43
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 2-Mar-2005 Posts: 2752
From: Poland | | |
|
| @Al4
Quote:
| Windows is heavy, expensive... |
Windows is common. Tons of superb software and games.
Quote:
Linux is perfect workstation and decent desktop OS. You say 'complicated' but what you should say is 'unfamilar'. You can build whatever you want on top of it.
Quote:
I got second hand PowerBook G4 1.5Ghz for $200. Works like a charm. Also, I'm getting used to OS X. New ones? I don't care about price that much. Plastic MacBooks do break, get broken logic boards. That's my real beef with them, not the price.
Also, I can get MSI Wind, swap WiFi card and get myself OS X. Yeah, I don't give a fsck about EULAs._________________ OpenWindows Initiative. Port PS3 hardware to bananas. For free. Join today and receive expired $50 cupon from AI! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Swoop
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 11:26:57
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 20-Jun-2003 Posts: 2163
From: Long Riston, East Yorkshire | | |
|
| @Al4
Quote:
| What are the pros and cons of each in your eyes? To me they all have their weaknesses and various pros. |
Most applications, 1) Windows, 2) Linux, 3) OS X, and last AmigaOS. Most idiot proof, 1) Windows, 2) OS X, 3) AmigaOS, and last Linux. Most user friendly, 1) AmigaOS, 2) OS X, 3) Linux, and last Windows. Most fun to use, 1) AmigaOS, 2) OS X, 3) Linux, and last Windows.
Probably contraversial, but hey, it's only my opinion. _________________ Peter Swallow. A1XEG3-800 [IBM 750FX PowerPC], running OS4.1FE, using ac97 onboard sound.
"There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't." |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Wol
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 13:48:25
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1009
From: UK.......Sol 3. | | |
|
| @Al4
The thing that annoys me most about platforms is how bad the User Interfaces are, this in my opinion is one of the most important features.
I use a quad monitor system: A4000 060/ppc604 233 128mb CVisionPPC CVision64 AGA VLabMotion
OS3.9 CGX 4.2 (this is the important bit)
No matter how many screens I have active on any monitor ; the menus are instant, screen switching is instant. Heavy use does not slow down ANY of this ANYTIME.
Windows : is so PAINFULL to use, the user inteface is #### and dog slow, normal house keeping activities are almost impossible to do. Have to jump thro endless hoops just to simple stuff, media support is totally super crap, " new invisible hardware detected " Yawn.....
Mac: User interface is sticky icky slow and a bit odball, but stable ish, the file system is a rats nest of knots and loops
Comparing the feel of these systems, the Amiga "feels" about 100 times faster than my Mac and 2000 times faster than my wifes dual core PC.
I know we don`t have modern hardware, but it must be user frendly or it`s junk.
Wol.
_________________ It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder.~Albert Einstein |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
meet.mrnrg
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 14:00:18
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 5-Feb-2007 Posts: 1921
From: UK, AUS, US | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
OldFart
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 14:05:46
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Sep-2004 Posts: 3080
From: Stad; en d'r is moar ain stad en da's Stad. Makkelk zat! | | |
|
| @Swoop
Quote:
English not being my native language, does this mean something along the lines of "Proof of Idiotism"?
OldFart_________________ Life is a waste of time. Time is a waste of life. Get wasted all the time and you'll have the time of your life! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
meet.mrnrg
 |  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 14:44:56
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 5-Feb-2007 Posts: 1921
From: UK, AUS, US | | |
|
| The Apollo 13 Moon mission and most of the other space programs made do with what they had or could afford.
They did not have even the first space designs or vehicles, they manged. Mind you they had funding to hire talent.
If you have seen Apollo 13 the movie good. Otherwise: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_13
They had to make it back alive after critical component/s failed. Amiga will make it back alive to the mainstream, but dreams of concurring the galaxy are far fetched as God controls the universe and not us.
IMHO, one possible good reason for the galaxy expanding at such a rapid pace, is so to put everything else out in space (further and further away) from the negligent and destructive counterparts on earth. (Hence ensuring survival for the rest of the galaxy) HeheHehe Last edited by meet.mrnrg on 04-Jan-2009 at 02:48 PM.
_________________ Quote:
| Easy Pocket Money, Freelancers & Experts Online | MiniMig FPGA, Sam440 Flex 733Mhz PPC, Amiga OS 4.1 Update 2, MorphOS 2.4, Other - AmiKit + Cloanto Amiga Forever 2008 + E-UAE, AmigaSYS |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
serk118
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 16:54:44
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 25-Nov-2004 Posts: 685
From: London(uk) | | |
|
| @Al4
I use Windoz xp for ---------------------------------------- OpenOffice(my office usage) Firefox (best browser in this planet earth) Vlc player(plays any format)
come on you amigans port them to amiga. ---------------------------------------- i use my beloved amiga for rest. _________________ http://aros-exec.org/
http://serk118.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 18:26:51
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| @opi
Quote:
opi wrote: @Al4
Quote:
| Windows is heavy, expensive... |
Windows is common. Tons of superb software and games.
Quote:
Linux is perfect workstation and decent desktop OS. You say 'complicated' but what you should say is 'unfamilar'. You can build whatever you want on top of it.
Quote:
I got second hand PowerBook G4 1.5Ghz for $200. Works like a charm. Also, I'm getting used to OS X. New ones? I don't care about price that much. Plastic MacBooks do break, get broken logic boards. That's my real beef with them, not the price.
Also, I can get MSI Wind, swap WiFi card and get myself OS X. Yeah, I don't give a fsck about EULAs. |
Try the NC10 if you're going for a netbook and OSX, pretty similar to the Wind, but I believe can max out RAM higher, which OSX *does* need.
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
|  |
Re: Amiga vs WIndows vs Linux vs Mac... Posted on 4-Jan-2009 18:30:46
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| @Swoop
Quote:
Swoop wrote: @Al4
Quote:
| What are the pros and cons of each in your eyes? To me they all have their weaknesses and various pros. |
Most applications, 1) Windows, 2) Linux, 3) OS X, and last AmigaOS. Most idiot proof, 1) Windows, 2) OS X, 3) AmigaOS, and last Linux. Most user friendly, 1) AmigaOS, 2) OS X, 3) Linux, and last Windows. Most fun to use, 1) AmigaOS, 2) OS X, 3) Linux, and last Windows.
Probably contraversial, but hey, it's only my opinion. |
I won't argue on the apps, as I think I agree there.
On the idiot proof, it depends which idiot is driving, and what you're doing. I'd put it at OSX, Linux, Windows, AOS.
User friendly - I think you're nuts How many times have people had issues in just managing to write a readable DVD, and other tasks that just don't work 'problem-free' yet? OSX, Windows, then maybe a toss-up, depending on the task, but there are certainly some that 'just work' on a decently set up Linux system, and the better software helps there, as well.
Most fun - totally subjective, so not much point in debating.
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|