Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6155 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
22 crawler(s) on-line.
 95 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!

/  Forum Index
   /  Classic Amiga Software
      /  3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 )
PosterThread
OlafS25 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 15:25:59
#41 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-May-2010
Posts: 6573
From: Unknown

@pavlor

to 3 first

most developers left ALL platforms, commercial development stopped more than 10 years ago because of the lack of users and I do not see how the strategy of both AmigaOS or MorphOS could change this in future. The only platform that (in my view) could move some things is AROS but is ignored by most "NG" users (whyever).

Second users like you do not see (or better want not to see) the amount of development in the 68k community and how many more users are there.

Lack of modern software is common to all platforms. For example VAMP runs on AROS 68k, mplayer and ffplay work on it (enough processing power needed). There are plenty of emulators, Netsurf works on it too. There are far more office applications than on the other platforms. When here someone asked what software is used 90% were 68k.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
terminills 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 15:34:10
#42 ]
AROS Core Developer
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 1521
From: Unknown

@Severin

Quote:


* TrueType fonts. >we had that raliably working on 68k with afa_os for years, now with aros.
Quote:


yeah, about half the years it's been reliably working on OS4.



not that I mind but not so sure that is possible for it to be half as long as aos4 aros had TrueType in 2003 and Afa in 2005

http://amidevcpp.amiga-world.de/AfA_Screenshots/Truetype_Fontmanager.png

http://aros.sourceforge.net/pictures/screenshots/20030809/ftmanager.png

Last edited by terminills on 26-May-2013 at 03:39 PM.

_________________
Support AROS sponsor a developer.

"AROS is prolly illegal ~ Evert Carton" intentionally quoted out of context for dramatic effect

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 15:41:08
#43 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 9786
From: Unknown

@OlafS25

Quote:
Netsurf works on it too


You mean that horrible OS3 version or there is proper AROS 68k version?

Quote:
Second users like you do not see (or better want not to see) the amount of development in the 68k community and how many more users are there.


As I wrote, I´m mainly WinUAE/OS3 user (except some experiments with AROS). In comparison to NG, 68k is dead.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
OlafS25 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 15:44:49
#44 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-May-2010
Posts: 6573
From: Unknown

@pavlor

if 68k is already dead what is NG then?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 15:50:48
#45 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 9786
From: Unknown

@OlafS25

Quote:
if 68k is already dead what is NG then?


I wrote in comparison to. In comparison to 68k is NG alive, in comparison to mainstream world it is of course dead.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
OlafS25 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 16:07:07
#46 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-May-2010
Posts: 6573
From: Unknown

@pavlor

even in comparison I see no real advantage. When I look on the classic sites there is much more activity there. Look on eab.abime.net and compare it to amigans or morphzone. I have obviously a different definition of "dead" then...

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 16:39:47
#47 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 9786
From: Unknown

@OlafS25

Quote:
Look on eab.abime.net and compare it to amigans or morphzone. I


Talk is cheap, give us some applications!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Severin 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 18:11:58
#48 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 18-Aug-2003
Posts: 2740
From: Gloucestershire UK

@Zylesea

Quote:

Zylesea wrote:

The "yes" is okay for "hell of an improvement" but not for "exclusive". MorphOS has hardware accelaration since V2.0 (was called Layers 3D then, now enhanced display).
It's nice, but actually not a killer feature though.


Yes as in exclusive to NG machines not OS3.x... Better?

_________________
OS4 Rocks
X1000 beta tester, Sam440 Flex (733)

Visit the Official OS4 Support Site for more help.

It may be that your sole purpose is to serve as a warning to others.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
NutsAboutAmiga 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 18:32:03
#49 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 9-Jun-2004
Posts: 13047
From: Norway

@OlafS25

Quote:
if 68k is already dead what is NG then?


if every thing is dead including AROS, then way?

_________________
http://lifeofliveforit.blogspot.no/
Facebook::LiveForIt Software for AmigaOS

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Severin 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 18:35:12
#50 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 18-Aug-2003
Posts: 2740
From: Gloucestershire UK

@terminills

Fair enough, I didn't know that, just rememberd some news releases about it from a few years ago. 3.5+ had sort of truetype support but through hacks (erm.. third party addons) but it never looked very good compared to bitmap fonts on the classics due to antialiasing oddities.

_________________
OS4 Rocks
X1000 beta tester, Sam440 Flex (733)

Visit the Official OS4 Support Site for more help.

It may be that your sole purpose is to serve as a warning to others.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
A1200 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 26-May-2013 21:37:37
#51 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 5-May-2003
Posts: 3130
From: Westhall, UK

3.1 is a lotfaster out of the box than 3.5 and 3.9 because it hasn't got all the customisation and additional software. I prefer to customise my own 3.1 rather than install 3.5/3.9.

4.x didn't feel like an Amiga to me, but may have felt more so if I had had it running on an A1200 because I like to handle the original hardware - being retro to the max and all.

_________________
Amiga A1200, 3.1 ROMs, Blizzard 1230 MKIV 64MB & FPU, 4GB DoM SSD, Workbench 3.1

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
KimmoK 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 27-May-2013 8:16:32
#52 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5214
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland

For me...

The most perfect Amiga setup that I have had was A2000 & Wb1.3 in 1991.
Later I have not had time to set up my system to perfection.

My second best 68k system was tuned up 3.1 on A4k.
Later I found out that 3.9 was a lot stabler but needed still tuning to do the same as my old 3.1 system.

Biggest handicap was disk speed of my a4k. (2.3MB/s theorethical).

My SAM440ep-mini & AOS4.1 fixes the disk speed gap. It's the fastest filehandler in our household. (including my 2 month old x86 system)
And it has less limitations than my a4k. Less tricks to do to make it work (still tricks needed).
SAM440 has a lot more CPU performance than classic, enabling a lot more modern things.

And AOS4 feels Amiga ... even if it lacks executive that I loved on AOS3.x.

(my MOS systems are not in full use yet, neither my AROS box.)



(AOS4 is very usable in everyday use and while my system is not perfectly stable, I've found out that I can not easily find stable/reliable linux either for my x86 boxes... tried about 10 distros, also this mint 14 kde is unreliable piece of *)

Last edited by KimmoK on 27-May-2013 at 08:16 AM.

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Trixie 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 27-May-2013 8:19:44
#53 ]
Amiga Developer Team
Joined: 1-Sep-2003
Posts: 2119
From: Czech Republic

@KimmoK

Quote:
even if it lacks executive that I loved on AOS3.x.

How so? What executive is missing from OS4.x?

_________________
The Rear Window blog

AmigaOne X5000/020 @ 2GHz / 4GB RAM / Radeon RX 560 / ESI Juli@ / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition
SAM440ep-flex @ 667MHz / 1GB RAM / Radeon 9250 / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
OlafS25 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 27-May-2013 9:27:27
#54 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-May-2010
Posts: 6573
From: Unknown

@pavlor

I personal am mostly involved in game area. Part of this will be AROS Vision as a free and standardized platform usable on emulation and hardware. I hope I can soon make another announcements in this area (gamea). In pure application area there are is not much activity right now (except f.e. Netsurf AGA and other projects), but I do not see very many new applications on NG either. Most existing applications are 68k anyway. There are more chances to regain some momentum in the game market so this is what I am concentrating on.

Last edited by OlafS25 on 27-May-2013 at 09:28 AM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
KimmoK 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 27-May-2013 12:47:28
#55 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5214
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland

@Trixie

On aos4 you need to set priority for every app manually, separately, in icon info, to make system run smoothly under hevy load conditions.
In executive one can set rules for applications and set priorities for individual applications in one single place.
As an result I could have 600% CPU load and the system kept on flying just like with 0% CPU load. I have not experienced that on any other system, only with AOS+executive.
The effect was pretty equall on 7Mhz ... 50Mhz systems. And I have heard that also under emulation (UAE or Amithlon) executive gives/gave similar smoothness.

A little bit similarly it was fun to set per application which applications were allowed to use virtual memory and which not (with gmem app, IIRC, a little similar with vmem), I could then be 100% sure that anims and music play smoothly under heavy load and under heavy memory usage....

Last edited by KimmoK on 27-May-2013 at 01:11 PM.
Last edited by KimmoK on 27-May-2013 at 12:47 PM.

_________________
- KimmoK
// For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA
//
// Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
vox 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 27-May-2013 18:37:31
#56 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-Jun-2005
Posts: 3957
From: Belgrade, Serbia

@OlafS25

Quote:
if 68k is already dead what is NG then?


Nothing is dead until its used and software developed.
68k is dead as hardware (=not manifactured anymore)
but FPGA gives it a new life and chance.

Shame, Natami didn`t live up to reach end users.

Comparing AmiKit setup to AmigaOS 4, I still feel OS4 is more advanced
out of box - or its maybe an illusion because of using it real, not emulated.
AmiKIt is "honey pot" in terms that it comes with many apps and tweaks,
that no older 68k sys can compare to it,and automatic update system.

Improvement of AmiKit and AROS Vision are important
as software side of new 68k FPGA machines, if there will be any. Plus for emulation boxes like UAE on anything.

So its kinda "Seperated league"

_________________
OS 3.x AROS and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionalism. Learn it harder way!
SinclairQL and WII U lover :D
YT http://www.youtube.com/user/rasvoja

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
OlafS25 
Re: 3.1 vs 3.X and 4.X - can you update me?
Posted on 27-May-2013 21:55:48
#57 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-May-2010
Posts: 6573
From: Unknown

@vox

the whole "dead" nonsense was not by me. You are right, 68k is pure fun and I see chances in gaming area but not as serious "competition" to Windows or Linux. None platform is dead as long as there are users and developers on it. I hope to help to revive the platform for commercial game development. Perhaps just a dream but who knows

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle