Poster | Thread |
kyle
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 23-Oct-2016 17:11:30
| | [ #181 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 15-Oct-2006 Posts: 866
From: Livorno, Italy | | |
|
| Hey guys, need help.
I wanted again to try Blenderbut I have the following error from Elf Library when launching it: missing shared objects missing: libbz2.so.1.0 and libbffmpeg.so
When I can purchase the libbz2.so.1.0 library?
The thing strange is that libbffmpeg.so is present in my sobjs folder |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
jaokim
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 23-Oct-2016 17:17:53
| | [ #182 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 278
From: Sweden | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 23-Oct-2016 17:22:11
| | [ #183 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1474
From: Italia | | |
|
| blender benchmark is not always the same in the same hardware. 9 seconds of difference could be normal
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sundown
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 23-Oct-2016 18:18:24
| | [ #184 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 30-Aug-2003 Posts: 5120
From: Right here... | | |
|
| @kyle
Quote:
When I can purchase the libbz2.so.1.0 library? |
That lib seems to be missing from the FE install, but is in the 4.1 update 6 install. If you still have UD6 backed up, you just need to copy that lib over to sys:SObJs.Last edited by sundown on 23-Oct-2016 at 06:35 PM.
_________________ Hate tends to make you look stupid... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Severin
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 23-Oct-2016 20:01:43
| | [ #185 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2003 Posts: 2740
From: Gloucestershire UK | | |
|
| @klx300r
I'm using beta but that shouldn't make much difference.
I did the test after booting to a 'clean' workbench (press shift while booting to disable wbstartup), It's my normal practice when using cpu heavy programs. _________________ OS4 Rocks X1000 beta tester, Sam440 Flex (733)
Visit the Official OS4 Support Site for more help.
It may be that your sole purpose is to serve as a warning to others. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kyle
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 23-Oct-2016 22:57:16
| | [ #186 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 15-Oct-2006 Posts: 866
From: Livorno, Italy | | |
|
| @jaokim
Thank you, I found the libbz2.so.1.0 in the SDK of link you indicated me, now blender works fine again
blend.test repeated, this time I have a time of 14:07.90 with my 460ex |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 24-Oct-2016 3:37:31
| | [ #187 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3837
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| Quote:
Severin wrote: @klx300r
I'm using beta but that shouldn't make much difference.
I did the test after booting to a 'clean' workbench (press shift while booting to disable wbstartup), It's my normal practice when using cpu heavy programs. |
ah ok I figured as much as I used to be a beta tester myself prior to the release of the X1000 so I can confirm that yes indeed all kinds of benchmark testing were different between my beta and official releases
anyhow can you please run the benchmark on your non beta partition please just to compare Boing Balls to Boing Balls _________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 24-Oct-2016 11:13:44
| | [ #188 ] |
|
|
|
Amiga Developer Team |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4446
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| @kyle
libbz2.so is part of the standard OS install but the links to the other versions weren't created in the FE: version.
libbffmepg.so fails because it's the comonent that need libbz2.so _________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 24-Oct-2016 11:21:55
| | [ #189 ] |
|
|
|
Amiga Developer Team |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4446
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| @klx300r
You realise that the changes I made to blender in version 5 and 6 were to the video editing part (replaceing libffmepg with a version 3.0 based version) if you were bench marking the change in speed of editing a video and testing which new codecs worked and whch didn't, you might be doing somthing worth while, but endless benchmarking of the same dull benchmark test is just so unproductive and meaningless.
And worying about 9 seconds in a 400 second render is just plain ... well it's hard to describe without risking a abuse report!
Please use blender to
Edit a video Render your favourite spaceship model Create a model of your own Make an animated movie Create assets for a 3D/2d game. edit python scruipts in the python orientated editor ... ... ...
_________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 24-Oct-2016 15:33:03
| | [ #190 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3837
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| @broadblues
yes Andy I'm aware of the changes you've made and that's why I sent you another donation so thanks again!
But the title of my thread 'kind of' gives a hint of what this thread is about before even opening it I like to see benchmarks of all kinds for as long as any computing device has been around and I NEVER WORRY (or sing the blues) lol when I'm messing with my miggies eh ..i do stuff because I enjoy it much like some people like singing the blues I suppose
_________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 3-Nov-2016 14:20:45
| | [ #191 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3837
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| new X5000 users where are ya _________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
eliyahu
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 3-Nov-2016 16:39:49
| | [ #192 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 3-Mar-2010 Posts: 1958
From: Waterbury, Connecticut (USA) | | |
|
| @klx300r
Quote:
new X5000 users where are ya |
still under NDA. i don't think any non-beta customers have yet to take possession of any cyrus boards.
-- eliyahu_________________ "Physical reality is consistent with universal laws. When the laws do not operate, there is no reality. All of this is unreal." |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Rob
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 3-Nov-2016 16:52:02
| | [ #193 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 20-Mar-2003 Posts: 6351
From: S.Wales | | |
|
| @eliyahu
Yep, I think there'd be a few "I've got my X5000" threads if they had. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 3-Nov-2016 17:22:31
| | [ #194 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3837
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| Quote:
eliyahu wrote: @klx300r
Quote:
new X5000 users where are ya |
still under NDA. i don't think any non-beta customers have yet to take possession of any cyrus boards.
-- eliyahu |
hmm see them for sale to the public already though & I suppose Rob is right in that we should very soon be seeing some excited new X5K owners round the forums _________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
SimplePPC
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 3-Nov-2016 17:48:15
| | [ #195 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 9-Mar-2003 Posts: 109
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @broadblues
Shouldn't you have linked to libbz2.so instead which then would have 'autolinkend' to the latest availabe libbz2.so version which isnt libbz2.so.1 but something else ?
Smoking Guns has the same 'feature' btw :) Quote:
broadblues wrote: @kyle
libbz2.so is part of the standard OS install but the links to the other versions weren't created in the FE: version.
libbffmepg.so fails because it's the comonent that need libbz2.so |
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
TRIPOS
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 3-Nov-2016 18:10:50
| | [ #196 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 4-Apr-2014 Posts: 1205
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @klx300r
The x5000 hasn't been made available yet AFAIK.
There are some benchmarks and performance discussions over at morph.zone in various threads if you're interested. Conclusion you can draw is that it's about on par with the rest of the PPC's (worth mentioning) that we have been using. Some relative upsides, some relative downsides. But overall the same 2005 level performance (the peak of PPC).
In the context of this thread, stuff like 3D rendering and multimedia are examples of applications that will pay the penalty of a relatively weak FPU and completely missing Altivec.
Last edited by TRIPOS on 03-Nov-2016 at 06:17 PM. Last edited by TRIPOS on 03-Nov-2016 at 06:13 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 3-Nov-2016 18:49:55
| | [ #197 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3837
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| @TRIPOS
thanks for the info over at morph.zone. I'm sure new X5000 users will pop up here soon once non-beta testers receive their new X5000
_________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 4-Nov-2016 2:34:50
| | [ #198 ] |
|
|
|
Amiga Developer Team |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4446
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| @SimplePPC
Quote:
Shouldn't you have linked to libbz2.so instead which then would have 'autolinkend' to the latest availabe libbz2.so version which isnt libbz2.so.1 but something else ?
Smoking Guns has the same 'feature' btw :) Quote:
broadblues wrote:
@kyle
libbz2.so is part of the standard OS install but the links to the other versions weren't created in the FE: version.
libbffmepg.so fails because it's the comonent that need libbz2.so
|
Doesn't work like that. shared object based libraries are not version compatable, if you link againt version 1 of a library you can not substitute version 2 as a major version bump means a change in API.
However I do not explictly link to any version.
My linker script looks like
g++ -use-dynld -Wl,-Map=../obj/amigaos-ppc/ld.map -o ../obj/amigaos-ppc/bin/bldyn ../obj/amigaos-ppc/buildinfo.o ../obj/amigaos-ppc/creator/*.o \ -L ../obj/amigaos-ppc/bin/ \ [snip] huge number of object file [/snip] -lbffmpeg -lpthread -lz -lbz2 -lexpat -lfreetype -ljpeg -lpng -ldl -lSDL \ -lIlmImf -lHalf -lIlmThread -lIex -lImath -lopenal -lalut -lintl\ -lpython25 -lGL
and the libbffmpeg.a link looks like
gcc -shared -Wl,--no-undefined -o /Programing/projects/blender-svn/blender/obj/amigaos-ppc/bin/libbffmpeg.so \ [snip] huge number of object file [/snip] -lpthread -lz -lauto -lbz2
so as you see I do not explictly set the version to link to
Last edited by broadblues on 04-Nov-2016 at 02:37 AM.
_________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 4-Nov-2016 2:36:27
| | [ #199 ] |
|
|
|
Amiga Developer Team |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4446
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
| |
Re: Blender benchmark time! Posted on 9-Feb-2017 4:04:21
| | [ #200 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3837
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| I see a bunch of new X5000 users here now so c'mon try out Blender & post your results _________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|