Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
17 crawler(s) on-line.
 105 guest(s) on-line.
 1 member(s) on-line.


 agami

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 agami:  2 mins ago
 Seiya:  1 hr 31 mins ago
 matthey:  1 hr 53 mins ago
 Rob:  3 hrs 3 mins ago
 vox:  3 hrs 7 mins ago
 kolla:  4 hrs 1 min ago
 mbrantley:  4 hrs 2 mins ago
 pixie:  4 hrs 25 mins ago
 FerruleMedia:  4 hrs 33 mins ago
 amigakit:  4 hrs 47 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga General Chat
      /  How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
PosterThread
djrikki 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 13-Mar-2011 23:10:39
#21 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 22-Jun-2010
Posts: 2077
From: Grimsby, UK

@MacSociety

This week I heard.

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
DAX 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 13-Mar-2011 23:10:48
#22 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-Sep-2009
Posts: 2790
From: Italy

@MacSociety
Yup, PCI sound card it was

This model:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16829121122

GFX I don't know, there is a built in GFX chip (working) and several cards can be used, Acube for example is selling these:

http://www.acube-systems.biz/index.php?page=hardware&pid=6

Check the bottom of the page...

_________________
SamFlex Complete 800Mhz System + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 4
Amiga 2000 DKB 2MB ChipRam GVP G-Force040 Picasso 2 OS3.9 BB2
AmigaCD 32

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
djrikki 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 13-Mar-2011 23:11:52
#23 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 22-Jun-2010
Posts: 2077
From: Grimsby, UK

As for sound... I'd imagine that will be fixed fairly soon.

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Mrodfr 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 14-Mar-2011 7:00:44
#24 ]
Super Member
Joined: 28-Jan-2007
Posts: 1396
From: French

strange, can't arrive to post ragemem benchmark (result broken).

Last edited by Mrodfr on 14-Mar-2011 at 07:02 AM.
Last edited by Mrodfr on 14-Mar-2011 at 07:01 AM.

_________________
BTW, what you have done for the amiga today ????

-A1200+Mediator+VooDoo3+060/50+96mo+SCSI-KIT
-SAM440EP-667mhz-on MapowerKC3000+AOS4.1

Amiga Docs Disks Preservation Project

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
elwood 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 14-Mar-2011 8:50:56
#25 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 17-Sep-2003
Posts: 3428
From: Lyon, France

@MacSociety

Quote:
I would think it dumb to ship a system with no sound so they must be using a sound card???

It's more dumb to not buy now and then, when the sound driver will be released and there is no more stock, you'll really feel to be dumb

_________________
Philippe 'Elwood' Ferrucci
Sam460 1.10 Ghz
AmigaOS 4 betatester
Amiga Translator Organisation

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
DAX 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 14-Mar-2011 9:50:57
#26 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-Sep-2009
Posts: 2790
From: Italy

@elwood
What MacSociety meant was that he thought they would be including the sound card.

@MacSociety
I don't know if they do, but Amiga dealers are always happy to configure systems for you, so if you ask them to ship your system with a sound card already installed and configured, I don't think they will have a problem.

Also...

@Tonyw (and MacSociety)
I think the PCI-E 1x slot can be used to host a sata controller (for mutliple ports) something like this maybe:



Or use a riser in combination with a standard PCI controller.

That way you can place the sound card in the (now free) standard PCI slot, the sata controller in the PCI-E 1x slot and an eventual GFX card in the faster PCI-E slot.
Again it would be better to contact the dealers and inquire for custom add-ons/installations.

_________________
SamFlex Complete 800Mhz System + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 4
Amiga 2000 DKB 2MB ChipRam GVP G-Force040 Picasso 2 OS3.9 BB2
AmigaCD 32

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
m3x 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 14-Mar-2011 10:03:29
#27 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 15-May-2003
Posts: 311
From: Bologna, Italy

@ChrisH

Quote:
Also, the Sam440 is not really suited to being a 3D games machine (although when Gallium is ported it might become half-decent for playing Quake 3), but I imagine the Sam460 should be pretty good (as far as Amigas go for 3D games!).

The new Q3 executable I recompiled run on a Sam440ep 667 Mhz at 21.7 FPS with high quality settings on, while for comparison the old executable, with the same settings run at 14.2 FPS.
If you're interested to test the current executable, download it from here:

www.soft3dev.net/games/openarena-ns.lha

Just rename the baseq3 directory to baseoa to use Q3 data files.

Beware: the executable currently tend to freeze in the menus (that's why it isn't released yet)

Sorry for the OT

_________________
Massimiliano Tretene, ACube Systems, Soft3

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Trixie 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 14-Mar-2011 10:14:27
#28 ]
Amiga Developer Team
Joined: 1-Sep-2003
Posts: 2090
From: Czech Republic

@MacSociety

Quote:
what advantages does the SAM 460 give over the last models

The SAM440ep makes a nice coder's machine. It's neither lightning-fast nor has it plenty of memory so it is ideal for developing and optimizing software. But as a multimedia or gaming machine it falls short. If I were you I'd go for the 460ex.

_________________
The Rear Window blog

AmigaOne X5000/020 @ 2GHz / 4GB RAM / Radeon RX 560 / ESI Juli@ / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition
SAM440ep-flex @ 667MHz / 1GB RAM / Radeon 9250 / AmigaOS 4.1 Final Edition

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Spectre660 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 14-Mar-2011 11:49:09
#29 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 5-Jun-2005
Posts: 3918
From: Unknown

@DAX

When Uboot and Amiga OS 4.x support booting from a controller like this in the PCI-E 1x slot or a PCI-E 1x sound card in this slot then you will have a killer machine.

Quote:
@Tonyw (and MacSociety) I think the PCI-E 1x slot can be used to host a sata controller (for mutliple ports) something like this maybe:

_________________
Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
NoelFuller 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 14-Mar-2011 13:11:56
#30 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 29-Mar-2003
Posts: 926
From: Auckland, New Zealand

I have been told someone is working on a PCI-e 1x sata controller but no indication of when. Nor have enquiries revealed anyone working on a sound card driver for that slot, yet.

I assembled over a week ago a SAM460ex with 2 GB ram, 2 sata drives, and Radeo HD 4650 1 GB graphics card. With the graphics card the machine is very pleasing to use despite a few things yet to come. Once I departed from the onboard vga, I experienced vastly better graphics, booting and stability - having yet to experience a lockup but no doubt with more old software installed that would change.

Noel

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
number6 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 14-Mar-2011 13:38:56
#31 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 25-Mar-2005
Posts: 11587
From: In the village

@Mrodfr

Quote:
strange, can't arrive to post ragemem benchmark (result broken).


If you're having trouble posting ragemem results as is:
Remove the arrow character that points left.

#6

_________________
This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author.
*Secrecy has served us so well*

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
NoelFuller 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 15-Mar-2011 5:15:22
#32 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 29-Mar-2003
Posts: 926
From: Auckland, New Zealand

@Mrodfr

You drew my attention to ragemem so I ran a comparison with my A1 G3. I do not have
access to a SAM440.

Except for the small L2 cache the SAM460 appears to have a considerable edge on the A1 all the way. I'm not quite certain what the video bus is measuring. Neither the graphics card nor the SATA devices feature here. I gather that PCI-e 1x can have a throughput of 3 GB/sec but we have no drivers there yet. I gathered wrong, should have checked: See correction by Olegil below, #34 ,and further qualification concerning ragemem values by Dax, #37

Noel


A1 benchmark test SAM460ex test

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010

CPU: IBM PowerPC 750 FX 2.2 @ 800 Mhz AMCC PPC460EX 1.2 @ 1150 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB L1: 32 KB - L2: 256 KB
Cache Line: 32 128

---CPU ---
MAX MIPS: 1588 2298

--- L1 ---
READ32: 3026 MB/Sec 4313 MB/Sec
READ64: 6026 MB/Sec 8593 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 2681 MB/Sec 4204 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 4033 MB/Sec 8357 MB/Sec

--- L2 ---
READ32: 1536 MB/Sec 1035 MB/Sec
READ64: 2077 MB/Sec 1035 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 1370 MB/Sec 461 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 1939 MB/Sec 462 MB/Sec

--- RAM ---
READ32: 177 MB/Sec 283 MB/Sec
READ64: 186 MB/Sec 283 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 113 MB/Sec 461 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 113 MB/Sec 461 MB/Sec
WRITE: 588 MB/Sec (Tricky) 864 MB/Sec (Tricky)

--- VIDEO BUS ---
READ: 27 MB/Sec 66 MB/Sec

Last edited by NoelFuller on 15-Mar-2011 at 07:04 PM.
Last edited by NoelFuller on 15-Mar-2011 at 05:22 AM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
OldFart 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 15-Mar-2011 10:06:03
#33 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-Sep-2004
Posts: 3059
From: Stad; en d'r is moar ain stad en da's Stad. Makkelk zat!

@NoelFuller

Please post your results in THIS thread. It is all about ragemem results.

OldFart

_________________
More then three levels of indigestion and you're scroomed!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
olegil 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 15-Mar-2011 10:12:53
#34 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 22-Aug-2003
Posts: 5895
From: Work

@NoelFuller

Nice.

But good luck getting 3GB/sec over PCIe x1 (it's not 1x, it's x1!!!!! NxAGP, PCIe x N. It's number of lanes, not bits per clock! Read it as "by" instead of "eks")

base speed of PCIe is 2500Mbps, bidirectional, per lane. 4/5 bit encoded, so effective bit rate becomes 2GigaBIT per seconds. That's 250MegaByte per seconds, minus packet overhead (much like ethernet, really).

Good news is this can flow continously in both directions at once, unlike PCI or AGP that would need to halt traffic to wait for data coming back.

_________________
This weeks pet peeve:
Using "voltage" instead of "potential", which leads to inventing new words like "amperage" instead of "current" (I, measured in A) or possible "charge" (amperehours, Ah or Coulomb, C). Sometimes I don't even know what people mean.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
NoelFuller 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 15-Mar-2011 11:28:09
#35 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 29-Mar-2003
Posts: 926
From: Auckland, New Zealand

@OldFart

Well, I never got round to noticing that thread. I'm always a bit suspicious of what speed tests measure so will look through the discussion.

Noel

Last edited by NoelFuller on 15-Mar-2011 at 11:32 AM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
NoelFuller 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 15-Mar-2011 11:30:33
#36 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 29-Mar-2003
Posts: 926
From: Auckland, New Zealand

@olegil

Thanks for the explanation. Not the first time bits and bytes have got mixed about. Will pass this back to my informant.

Noel

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
DAX 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 15-Mar-2011 11:56:25
#37 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-Sep-2009
Posts: 2790
From: Italy

@NoelFuller @All
Rage mem values for the 460 at this point are only preliminary. Both Max Tretene (m3x) form Acube and Hans De Ruiter (which is working on the RadeonHD driver) have stated that currently these values are lower due to the WIP status.
m3x already has a faster set up "in-house".

_________________
SamFlex Complete 800Mhz System + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 4
Amiga 2000 DKB 2MB ChipRam GVP G-Force040 Picasso 2 OS3.9 BB2
AmigaCD 32

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
OldFart 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 15-Mar-2011 21:50:26
#38 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-Sep-2004
Posts: 3059
From: Stad; en d'r is moar ain stad en da's Stad. Makkelk zat!

@DAX

Quote:
m3x already has a faster set up "in-house".

I'm very, very curious about what figures can be reached when all aspects have been sorted out and dealt with.

OldFart

_________________
More then three levels of indigestion and you're scroomed!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
ChrisH 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 16-Mar-2011 8:57:25
#39 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-Jan-2005
Posts: 6679
From: Unknown

@Cool_amigaN Quote:
really bad 3d drivers (like all AOS4.x compatible computer line)

Sorry, but that's rubbish. OS4 has PRETTY GOOD hardware-accelerated 3D drivers, unlike many niche OSes. It's certainly true they could be even faster, but not so much that they are useless (CPU can be just as much of a problem for 3D games, thus Sam440 is not so good for them - please don't assume all OS4 machines are the same as your Sam440).

Last edited by ChrisH on 16-Mar-2011 at 09:00 AM.

_________________
Author of the PortablE programming language.
It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue...

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
DAX 
Re: How more advance is SAM 460 over SAM 440?
Posted on 16-Mar-2011 10:46:48
#40 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-Sep-2009
Posts: 2790
From: Italy

@OldFart
Sky is the limit!

Jokes aside, in current internal wip form he mentioned (just to make an example) the following for Ram:

Read: 365+ MB/s – Write: 560+ MB/s

Which is already quite more than what's reported above (even more impressive if compared to the A1 beside it). Moreover the VideoBus is in "snore mode" at the moment, so pleasant surprises ahead...

@Cool_amigaN
The good'ol 440EP has a lot of bottlenecks which prevent good 3D performance. No L2 cache, slow FSB, the impossibility of using faster video cards and/or providing to those (if available) sufficient bandwidth and CPU support.
Improvements can come of course, the latest optimized version of Quake3 (by m3x) looks promising, and in the case of the Flex, new drivers might allow the usage of better GFX cards (Radeon HD 4350 possibly?) but to truly test how good AmigaOS 4 is at 3D, we need HW like the 460EX or X1000, which won't oppose the software side with HW bottlenecks.

Last edited by DAX on 16-Mar-2011 at 10:47 AM.

_________________
SamFlex Complete 800Mhz System + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 4
Amiga 2000 DKB 2MB ChipRam GVP G-Force040 Picasso 2 OS3.9 BB2
AmigaCD 32

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle