Poster | Thread |
Tomppeli
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 5-Aug-2012 19:58:10
| | [ #441 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 18-Jun-2004 Posts: 1652
From: Home land of Santa, sauna, sisu and salmiakki | | |
|
| @vox
Quote:
This is the only Limebook video I could find showing LimeOS (Ubuntu PPC)LimeBook
Does it indicate the future performance of OS4? |
No. Ubuntu is bloated and slow c**p._________________ Rock lobster bit me. My Workbench has always preferences. X1000 + AmigaOS4.1 FE "Anyone can build a fast CPU. The trick is to build a fast system." -Seymour Cray |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Zylesea
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 5-Aug-2012 22:16:08
| | [ #442 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 16-Mar-2004 Posts: 2263
From: Ostwestfalen, FRG | | |
|
| @KimmoK
As I repeadtedly said, OWB on the Efika is nice enough, even youtube works to some extend (depends on codec and practically fails then due to low ram). But that youtube thing requires a really optimized browser like OWB for MorphOS as Fab described a few posts above. But even other rather heavy things like maps.google.#? are working rather nicely. I don't know though how well MUIOWB runs on OS4. But OWB MorphOS is really nice and fast and since MUI OWB is a port of that it shouln't be too crappy me thinks. The 400 MHz are no highspeed though and once you're used to a beefier system you'll find many things rather snorring-slow, but it's fairly okay. Depends on the price of course, too.
I am pretty much satisfied with my Amiga fix on my ppc laptops now (15" Powerbook and maybe the 12" iBook will see MorphOS soon as well), hence I am probably not interested in that device. But generally spoken, an e300/400 MHz based device is far from being useless (given the OS is stable and optimized and the price is not nuts). _________________ My programs: via.bckrs.de MorphOS user since V0.4 (2001) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
realize
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 0:45:40
| | [ #443 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 14-Apr-2003 Posts: 1797
From: nyc | | |
|
| @Mikey_C
Quote:
WHERE IS THE GODDAM NETBOOK HYPERION??? |
Hmm I was banned twice for comments like this and for things similar to what others have posted in this thread... are you guys calling hyperion liars? (which is what you all asked me when I asked where is proof of the netbook)
surely a year later Hyperion will have the netbook at Amiwest right guys? surely.
its ok i've been a member since the site's inception and I got banned and AR 'd countless times for criticizing Amiga Inc (and now its fashionable to do so here, and by some of the biggest fanboys who back then complained about me and filed abuse reports) maybe a lesson? probably not..
You would think all the Sam owners with incomplete drivers would realize that this netbook project would once again call for writing drivers on "alien" pc hardware. Not easy. Time consuming, requires a team and money. So years. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 8:13:25
| | [ #444 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6321
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @realize
perhaps it was (just a guess) the choice of words why you were banned?
"liars" is a hard word, Solie said there is a netbook booting (at Amiwest 2011) and that propably was. But from "booting" to "completely supported" can be a long road (drivers...). Then they need software on it. They propably do not want to preinstall OWB (from MorphOS) but their own "Timberwolf". And we all can see (and read) that it is not ready for a netbook. So I would guess that there will be at least another announcement at Amiwest.
Of course the announced "release date" was way too optimistic but if you think they knew that when the release date was announced or if they simple underestimated the problems must everybody decide for himself. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ExiE
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 8:27:28
| | [ #445 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 18-May-2004 Posts: 450
From: Czech Amiga News | | |
|
| @OlafS25 Quote:
They propably do not want to preinstall OWB (from MorphOS) but their own "Timberwolf". |
If the netbook is underpowered as expected, OWB would be much more suitable for use there than Timberwolf...
Last edited by ExiE on 06-Aug-2012 at 08:27 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 8:34:47
| | [ #446 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6321
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ExiE
Yes it would but we all know that todays "Amigaworld" is not really rational . I personally guess they do not want to install software from "competition" (when you look at the long "red" versus "blue" war). To be honest it would have been more rational (from my point of view) to stop development of "Timberwolf" after with OWB a good browser was available and concentrate on more missing software like porting a office-package. But that is only my personal view (from someone who was "outside" a long time). But propably they do not want to be dependent from other developers. Last edited by OlafS25 on 06-Aug-2012 at 08:48 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Swoop
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 8:52:53
| | [ #447 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 20-Jun-2003 Posts: 2162
From: Long Riston, East Yorkshire | | |
|
| @OlafS25
Timberwolf was a part-time bounty project, that just happened to be taken on by Two of th OS4 developers. It never was a Hyperion project. Red/blue/competition just doesn't relate to that situation.
As for OWB it is quite useful, but doesn't have a proper browser front end. Also, as I understand it, MUI-OWB is still buggy, and doesn't offer all the same features as the morph-os version. Hence on OS4, Timberwolf still has a place to fill. Is there a bounty for an office suite? Is there an office suite that can be ported? Do we need an office suite?
Certainly I do a lot of office work on my A1, and I manage without an office suite. Still that's only my opinion, and I'm not an outsider. _________________ Peter Swallow. A1XEG3-800 [IBM 750FX PowerPC], running OS4.1FE, using ac97 onboard sound.
"There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't." |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 8:59:21
| | [ #448 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6321
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Swoop
MUI on AOS could be improved and would be of great benefit for all OS4 users. But they do not support MUI (for them it is MorphOS again even though it existed long before) but Reaction. It is again something more emotional than rational to me.
And regarding Office. Yes you need one when you want to win users outside the existing base. Last edited by OlafS25 on 06-Aug-2012 at 09:04 AM. Last edited by OlafS25 on 06-Aug-2012 at 08:59 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 9:10:27
| | [ #449 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9578
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @OlafS25
Quote:
MUI on AOS could be improved and would be of great benefit for all OS4 users. |
MUI was improved in Update3 and Update4, full MUI4 compatibility will be probably introduced in 4.2 (according to screenshots posted by kas1e).
Quote:
And regarding Office. Yes you need one when you want to win users outside the existing base. |
Today, best Office support has AROS x86: MS Office in DosBox. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 9:18:52
| | [ #450 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6321
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @pavlor
Yes but MUI is not the (or at least one next to Reaction) official supported GUI-toolkit, it was (and is) done by developers outside (as far as I know). Hyperion seems to be afraid to be "dependent" of others and afraid of not controlling the source.
In a small market with limited resources it would be more wise to concentrate them on critical parts (of OS and software) than to reinvent wheels. But that is another topic...
Back to thread: People have to wait for Amiwest... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 9:25:09
| | [ #451 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9578
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @OlafS25
Quote:
Yes but MUI is not the (or at least one next to Reaction) official supported GUI-toolkit, it was (and is) done by developers outside (as far as I know). |
MUI is part of OS4 since first 4.0 prerelease. If I remember correctly, Hyperion has access to MUI source code (for MUI3.9 bugfixes).
Quote:
People have to wait for Amiwest... |
Hopefuly this year. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 9:38:50
| | [ #452 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| @pavlor
"Today, best Office support has AROS x86: MS Office in DosBox"
I would prefer OO on AEROS or MS office natively on AEROS (via wine). _________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 9:56:23
| | [ #453 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9578
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @KimmoK
Quote:
I would prefer OO on AEROS or MS office natively on AEROS (via wine). |
AEROS is Linux with hosted AROS desktop. I can use Windows with UAE for that purpose. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 9:59:33
| | [ #454 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6321
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @pavlor
As long as we do not find a billionare investing in the market aeros is the best bet to get modern software or use what we have. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 10:03:27
| | [ #455 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9578
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @OlafS25
Quote:
As long as we do not find a billionare investing in the market aeros is the best bet to get modern software or use what we have. |
I will rather use what I have.
I hoped to buy OS4 netbook for my birthday, it seems I shall wait a little bit longer. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Swoop
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 10:15:28
| | [ #456 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 20-Jun-2003 Posts: 2162
From: Long Riston, East Yorkshire | | |
|
| @OlafS25
Quote:
MUI on AOS could be improved and would be of great benefit for all OS4 users. |
My understanding is that stephan, or morphos developers, won't release/port MUI4 to OS4, and hence we are stuck with mui3.8, plus kase1, and denill's tweaks. As for reaction, that always was the OS gui kit, mui was always 3rd party._________________ Peter Swallow. A1XEG3-800 [IBM 750FX PowerPC], running OS4.1FE, using ac97 onboard sound.
"There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't." |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 10:20:49
| | [ #457 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6321
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Swoop
No they do not release the source. But that stops nobody to reimplement it. And I know that Reaction was the toolkit introduced with 3.5/3.9 but in reality MUI is established as GUI standard because it is available for all platforms. How many applications with Reactions GUI are there? So it would be best to support the standard instead of trying to go the own way and force developers to decide if they want to support AOS or the rest. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
samo79
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 10:25:34
| | [ #458 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 13-Feb-2003 Posts: 3505
From: Italy, Perugia | | |
|
| @OlafS25
But MUI still also shareware under OS4 so it will never be the default toolkit _________________ BACK FOR THE FUTURE
http://www.betatesting.it/backforthefuture
Sam440ep Flex 800 Mhz 1 GB Ram + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6 AmigaOne XE G3 800 Mhz - 640 MB Ram - Radeon 9200 SE + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: OS4 Netbook in 2012? Posted on 6-Aug-2012 11:32:38
| | [ #459 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| @pavlor
>>I would prefer OO on AEROS or MS office natively on AEROS (via wine). >AEROS is Linux with hosted AROS desktop. I can use Windows with UAE for that purpose.
Yes but most prefer to host on something else than MS OS. To hide the other OS one can do tricks with XP to boot directly to UAE, yes. But MS apps do not run inside Amiga environment. To my understanding in AEROS you have everything running in Amiga environment, you do not need linux window manager or windows to run MS office on AEROS. (IMO: C= USA should get AEROS if they want to be Amigalike with their "Amigas".) Last edited by KimmoK on 06-Aug-2012 at 11:34 AM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|