| Poster | Thread |
m3x
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 9:14:43
| | [ #141 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 15-May-2003 Posts: 288
From: Bologna, Italy | | |
|
| @Spectre660
Board: ACube Systems Sam440ep Flex CPU: 440ep @ 833 Mhz RAM: DDR 333 Mhz - 512 MB OS: Linux Debian 6 stable Kernel: 2.6.36
Blender 2.49 takes 15:53.03 seconds (running the test from a shell)
To be noted: it's really 833 Mhz, not 733 Mhz 
It seems the AOS4 Blender version is slight slower than the 2.49 version for Linux?
I'll try to find some time to update the Linux 440ep kernel to a more recent version next days _________________ Massimiliano Tretene, ACube Systems, Soft3 |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 12:26:28
| | [ #142 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 5-Jun-2005 Posts: 2416
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @m3x
You get a 12.33% increase in performance with a 4% increase in clock speed and newer kernel .
New kernel sounds good.
And happy fifth Anniversary .keep up the good work and product support. I think that the full potential of the Sam boards has not yet been exploited by the supported OSes and software and they are very good value for money.
Quote:
m3x wrote: @Spectre660
Board: ACube Systems Sam440ep Flex CPU: 440ep @ 833 Mhz RAM: DDR 333 Mhz - 512 MB OS: Linux Debian 6 stable Kernel: 2.6.36
Blender 2.49 takes 15:53.03 seconds (running the test from a shell)
To be noted: it's really 833 Mhz, not 733 Mhz 
It seems the AOS4 Blender version is slight slower than the 2.49 version for Linux?
I'll try to find some time to update the Linux 440ep kernel to a more recent version next days |
_________________ Sam440ep-Flex 800Mhz ,1GB.Radeon HD6670 lowprofile via PCI to PCIe Adaper. Sam460ex 1.15Ghz, 2GB.Radeon HD6670 . Apex TM-302-3 Case |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 15:59:57
| | [ #143 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 821
From: Italia | | |
|
| 

_________________
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 16:50:14
| | [ #144 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 3710
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Seiya
Nice graphs. Speed increase in newer Blender versions is clearly visible. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 17:14:51
| | [ #145 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 2401
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| @pavlor
The newest blender has qute a lot of differences thus the benchmatk may no longer be valid. Although the engine has been optimised, that may not be the only factor.
To help eliminate this a post of the resultant images might help if they are identical all is good. If they differ then the faster speed cannot be taken at face value.
Last edited by broadblues on 12-May-2012 at 05:16 PM.
_________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Kronos
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 17:26:23
| | [ #146 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1708
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @broadblues
Got 184s in blender 2.49b on a dual 1.8GHz Quicksilver.
Currently struggling to update to 2.62.... _________________ - We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet - blame Canada |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Kronos
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 19:29:10
| | [ #147 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1708
From: Unknown | | |
|
| down to 113sec with 2.62.....
Had to use a stopwatch as the GUI/skin decided to act up-
Last edited by Kronos on 12-May-2012 at 08:43 PM.
_________________ - We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet - blame Canada |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tommysammy
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 20:12:29
| | [ #148 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 20-Jan-2010 Posts: 339
From: Isselburg,Germany | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
andres
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 20:38:04
| | [ #149 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 3-Nov-2008 Posts: 272
From: Firenze (Italy) | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Kronos
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 20:43:20
| | [ #150 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1708
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @andres
Quicksilver (+Sonnet CPU-upgrade). _________________ - We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet - blame Canada |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
andres
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 20:45:56
| | [ #151 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 3-Nov-2008 Posts: 272
From: Firenze (Italy) | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tommysammy
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 21:14:35
| | [ #152 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 20-Jan-2010 Posts: 339
From: Isselburg,Germany | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Kronos
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 21:16:29
| | [ #153 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 1708
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tommysammy
/me runs a test without rendering : 0s !!!!!!
_________________ - We don't need good ideas, we haven't run out on bad ones yet - blame Canada |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tommysammy
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 21:27:35
| | [ #154 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 20-Jan-2010 Posts: 339
From: Isselburg,Germany | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Rose
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 12-May-2012 22:19:53
| | [ #155 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 5-Nov-2009 Posts: 303
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tommysammy
Quote:
tommysammy wrote: Third Test without anti-aliasing 76sec |
So now modifying test to make it look better?
BTW... 6.78sec without AA on sub 600€ market PC... about as relevant in this thread as that result. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
sundown
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 4:41:17
| | [ #156 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Aug-2003 Posts: 4576
From: West coast, USA | | |
|
| @Rose
Quote:
| So now modifying test to make it look better? |
He can modify the test any way he likes, as long as he explains how....
Quote:
| BTW... 6.78sec without AA on sub 600€ market PC... about as relevant in this thread as that result. |
But when it comes to running OS4, the X1000 runs circles around any other PC  _________________ X1000! Party on  Pure Gold Hate tends to make you look stupid... |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tommysammy
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 5:08:48
| | [ #157 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 20-Jan-2010 Posts: 339
From: Isselburg,Germany | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
bernd_afa
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 11:35:32
| | [ #158 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 14-Apr-2006 Posts: 828
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
AP
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 19:13:06
| | [ #159 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 319
From: Vienna/Austria | | |
|
| @bernd_afa:
Interesting, although I got other values.
AmigaOne X1000@1 GHz should be 745,20 sek. (which is even better for the SAM 460ex)
So a higher clocked SAM 460x would be interesting!
I don´t know, if the CPU can be over-clocked (like ACube did with the SAMflex), but if yes, this would be a good base for an "AmigaOnePlus".
_________________ Pegasos II with MorphOS 3.1 and AmigaOS 4.1 Amiga 3000 (coming soon) |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 19:37:03
| | [ #160 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3042
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @TrevorDick
Quote:
| We will probably skip v1.9 for the general release. The next version will probably be 2.0 and will include installation instructions for:- MintPPC |
This is great!
Could same / similar instruction be used to install Mint on SAMs?_________________ AF 2012, Hollywood Designer 5, AmigaOS 3.5,4.0 and 4.1 registered user, user of Linux Mint 13 Roots Taking Over The World |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|