Poster | Thread |
TRIPOS
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 16:44:57
| | [ #61 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 4-Apr-2014 Posts: 1205
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
TRIPOS
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 17:15:32
| | [ #62 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 4-Apr-2014 Posts: 1205
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @pavlor
Quote:
pavlor wrote: @TRIPOS
Quote:
Yeah, the 20-30 FPS (SAM) and 40-50 FPS (X1000) running Quake3 demo on HD7000/R7 cards blew us all away! |
In ANY resolution. Be it 800x600 or 1600x1200... |
The difference between the high/low resolution I have seen on the same test/machine is almost 30% (26.5% and 29.7%) so it's not like there isn't a difference. And for a HD7000/R7 all these numbers are ridiculous, no matter the difference, so...
But there already exist a thread for this, go here!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 17:29:49
| | [ #63 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9583
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @TRIPOS
800x600 - 32.9 FPS 1024x768 - 31.6 FPS 1280x1024 - 29.9 FPS 1600x1200 - 28.4 FPS
I hope math is not your source of income. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pampers
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 17:33:00
| | [ #64 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 4-Oct-2009 Posts: 154
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @mr2
My attitude? Maybe I just got tired of constant "war".
Maybe other parts are slower but overall performance is still better, as proven on some benchmarks done in the past. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
TRIPOS
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 18:40:51
| | [ #65 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 4-Apr-2014 Posts: 1205
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 19:02:07
| | [ #66 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9583
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @TRIPOS
See my post 60 for for lowest resolution I (carefuly) selected. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kolla
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 20:22:44
| | [ #67 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Aug-2003 Posts: 2885
From: Trondheim, Norway | | |
|
| Quote:
Hypex wrote:
BTW AmigaOS4 is a real AmigaOS compiled from source. |
From the original sources that were rewritten from scratch!_________________ B5D6A1D019D5D45BCC56F4782AC220D8B3E2A6CC |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sundown
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 20:27:04
| | [ #68 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 30-Aug-2003 Posts: 5120
From: Right here... | | |
|
| @all
Reading the thread on A.org, I'm not so sure this event is set in cement.
_________________ Hate tends to make you look stupid... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 20:28:23
| | [ #69 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9583
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @kolla
Quote:
From the original sources that were rewritten from scratch! |
Well, some components of AmigaOS didn´t changed in years (68k! IconEdit, MEmacs etc.). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 20:29:10
| | [ #70 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9583
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @sundown
Quote:
Reading the thread on A.org, I'm not so sure this event is set in cement. |
It may take few years (like SAM460 port)... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Zylesea
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 12-Apr-2015 21:50:53
| | [ #71 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 16-Mar-2004 Posts: 2263
From: Ostwestfalen, FRG | | |
|
| @pavlor
Quote:
pavlor wrote: @sundown
Quote:
Reading the thread on A.org, I'm not so sure this event is set in cement. |
It may take few years (like SAM460 port)... |
Of course it _may_. But as Bigfoot said the Sam port put a few Quark issues to light which got ironed out and speed up things now. The initial port to the X5000 was a two day job - sounds not too bad.
Anyway, currently awaiting arrival of 3.8 with the Sam support. X5000 support will not come before 3.10 . Which in not surprising as 3.8 is close and 3.9 will be a bug fixing release as the usual release circle is that evenly numbered releases introduce new features while the oddly numbered releases are primarily for bug fixes._________________ My programs: via.bckrs.de MorphOS user since V0.4 (2001) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ChrisH
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 13-Apr-2015 2:47:56
| | [ #72 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 30-Jan-2005 Posts: 6679
From: Unknown | | |
|
| I'm not sure what the logic of porting MorphOS to X5000 is, when it may cost about the same as X1000 (which I understood as the primary reason for no port). AFAIK, X1000 has been available in as much quantity as people were willing to buy it (manufactured in batches). Maybe MOS team changed their mind? Still, if they have to choose 1 machine to port, X5000 is obviously better as X1000 sales stopped by time of X5000 (if not already - I didn't check).
But anyway, it will be good to have: Competition is good for both OSes (at least if it doesn't get nasty), and choice of OS good for customers. And A-Eon may sell a few more X5000s, which is definitely good.
OK, going back to lurking under my stone... Last edited by ChrisH on 13-Apr-2015 at 02:56 AM. Last edited by ChrisH on 13-Apr-2015 at 02:53 AM.
_________________ Author of the PortablE programming language. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 13-Apr-2015 8:02:55
| | [ #73 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| GREAT NEWS!!!
Hope they pull it through!
Perhaps they manage do virtualization and partitioning to run both AmigaOS4.2 and MorphOS3.1x at the same time on separate cores of the system!
((+ more R&D can now officially+unofficially focus on mastering Freescale SoC features like SATA controller, 10Gbit ethernet, Encryption engine, various other accelerators, etc etc...))
UPDATE: Is there anywhere (a reverse engineered or original) block diagram of Cyrus+ motherboard?
I imagine 3PCIe channels are connected directly to 3 slots. But as there seems to be 2more PCIe slots and two PCI slots, I imagine the fourth PCIe v2.0 is bridged to 2xPCI and 2xPCIe (perhaps v1.0). (bridge chip near those two x1 slots perhaps)
(just curious) Last edited by KimmoK on 13-Apr-2015 at 08:57 AM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 13-Apr-2015 14:42:38
| | [ #74 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11204
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @Hillbillylitre
Because the point of OS4 isn't to run old Amiga software but to run native software to which 100% of OS4 software runs natively on OS4.
Bu this isn't the first time people thought to dump OS4 and just run an emulated OS3.9 on a PC. Even before OS4 was relased that was doing the rounds. Of course that would be even more pointless than custom hardware, the OS would have never been developed futher, and would be 15 years more behind than what it is now. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Karlos
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 13-Apr-2015 20:03:26
| | [ #75 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 24-Aug-2003 Posts: 4402
From: As-sassin-aaate! As-sassin-aaate! Ooh! We forgot the ammunition! | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hillbillylitre
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 13-Apr-2015 21:49:23
| | [ #76 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 4-Apr-2015 Posts: 270
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Hypex
But the OS is still at least fifteen years behind, I thought people had learned fifteen years ago or are you all johnny-come-lately or something?
You're in a way in the same position as fifteen years ago or even further back when almost nothing worked and everything was hanging far behind, or even worse, you're stuck back at the time.
To me it almost look like you like to torture yourselves, to squeeze everything possible out of the machines was fun but you can't repeat it on those PPC Amiga wannabe machines and OSes if thats what you are trying to do... _________________ Using: One Commodore C64 - One Commodore Amiga 500 - One Commodore Amiga 1200 with BVision and Blizzard 68060 with PPC coprocessor running Amiga DOS - One Hellbillylitre Amigatwox86x64x6000x running Windows7 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 13-Apr-2015 23:19:34
| | [ #77 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3836
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| @Karlos
ah so that's why TMHTG hasn't been active on all OS4.x related threads over at the.org for a while
@ Franko
any recent pics of the squirrels after a long winter _________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
number6
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 13-Apr-2015 23:38:27
| | [ #78 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 25-Mar-2005 Posts: 11587
From: In the village | | |
|
| @Karlos
He doesn't need a new account though. His old AW account is still here:
http://amigaworld.net/userinfo.php?uid=5608
#6
_________________ This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author. *Secrecy has served us so well* |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
agami
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 14-Apr-2015 7:32:32
| | [ #79 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 30-Jun-2008 Posts: 1650
From: Melbourne, Australia | | |
|
| @Hillbillylitre
Quote:
Hillbillylitre wrote:
But the OS is still at least fifteen years behind, I thought people had learned fifteen years ago or are you all johnny-come-lately or something? |
It's more complicated than that. You see, not only does Amiga time operate at a different speed to regular technology time, the time rate itself is non-linear.
Quote:
You're in a way in the same position as fifteen years ago or even further back when almost nothing worked and everything was hanging far behind, or even worse, you're stuck back at the time. |
Fifteen years ago we were only five years behind. At that time Amiga time was more equal to regular human time. And if you didn't know how to tell technology time then you bought an EyeTech AmigaOne and you ran AmigaOS 4.0
Quote:
To me it almost look like you like to torture yourselves, to squeeze everything possible out of the machines was fun but you can't repeat it on those PPC Amiga wannabe machines and OSes if thats what you are trying to do... |
To the outside observer it looks that way. As we move forward, Amiga time stretches out more and more, so to the outside observer it looks like OS 4.2 is taking a very very very very long time to come out. But you can't measure it using technology time, or even regular human time.
When you use Amiga time the benefit is your hardware ages much slower, and the next major OS update is always just around the corner; It's very exciting. Whilst in technology time the rate is increasing as it rushes toward the singularity, in Amiga time the rate is decreasing as things slow down toward the multiplicity; The point at which all Amiga hardware and software iterations are of equal age, and to a person in regular human time we will appear as if we're frozen. To a person in the singularity we will appear to be moving backwards in time. It's a general relativity thing.
Side note: What's a a Hillbilly litre? Is that like two quarts?
Last edited by agami on 14-Apr-2015 at 07:34 AM.
_________________ All the way, with 68k |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
agami
| |
Re: MorphOS port for X5000 confirmed Posted on 14-Apr-2015 8:53:34
| | [ #80 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 30-Jun-2008 Posts: 1650
From: Melbourne, Australia | | |
|
| @Hillbillylitre
And if that didn't blow your mind try this on for size:
Time, as in the clock of the universe, is itself slowing down. Which also means the speed limit, or the motion constant of the universe will decrease as well.
I know, right? This means that the speed of light will slow down as well. But this only matters to someone observing the universe from without. Inside, light will still travel at the speed of light. _________________ All the way, with 68k |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|