Poster | Thread |
corto
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 15-Apr-2016 20:32:57
| | [ #61 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 24-Apr-2004 Posts: 342
From: Grenoble (France) | | |
|
| Quote:
Seiya wrote: X5000 and G5 test is done. now, waiting x1000 users c'mon, there so many PPC here to test
|
I'm okay for testing but I have to say that I don't know where all that goes. There are many results but with heterogeneous contexts. And about benchmarks, when we want to get conclusions, it is necessary to explicit first what is the goal: compare 2 operating systems on the same board, compare two boards, ... and even that is not enough.
As the topic is "general benchmark", maybe the goal is just to see how various machine behave with what are called typical use cases (lame, blender, mplayer, ...).
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 15-Apr-2016 21:47:11
| | [ #62 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1473
From: Italia | | |
|
|
Quote:
corto wrote:
As the topic is "general benchmark", maybe the goal is just to see how various machine behave with what are called typical use cases (lame, blender, mplayer, ...).
|
you can considere like this. For x1000 could be interestint to see his performances on OS4 and Linux also for future OS develpment (smp, 3D, ecc)_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 22-Apr-2016 19:10:40
| | [ #63 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 22-Apr-2016 21:52:45
| | [ #64 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1473
From: Italia | | |
|
| @tlosm
amigaquake run only on AmigaOS, so is this OS4 images? _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 22-Apr-2016 22:18:41
| | [ #65 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Seiya
no it is a quake image _________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 22-Apr-2016 23:43:19
| | [ #66 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1473
From: Italia | | |
|
| @tlosm
ok, i wanted to say, Quake that run on OS4 Last edited by Seiya on 22-Apr-2016 at 11:43 PM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Samurai_Crow
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 23-Apr-2016 14:41:55
| | [ #67 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Jan-2003 Posts: 2320
From: Minnesota, USA | | |
|
| @Seiya
Quote:
Seiya wrote: @tlosm
ok, i wanted to say, Quake that run on OS4 |
If so, why does it say MacOS X in the lower-right corner? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Fransexy
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 23-Apr-2016 15:17:14
| | [ #68 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Jun-2004 Posts: 2334
From: Elche (Alicante), spain | | |
|
| @Samurai_Crow
Quote:
Samurai_Crow wrote: @Seiya
Quote:
Seiya wrote: @tlosm
ok, i wanted to say, Quake that run on OS4 |
If so, why does it say MacOS X in the lower-right corner? |
Because the left corner is the X5000 (apparently runing OS4) and the right corner is the quad g5 running MacOSX. Or at least that is what I understand_________________ No PowerPC, No Fun Make Amiga Great Again |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 23-Apr-2016 18:06:20
| | [ #69 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Fransexy
My LG 29'' have the option for have 2 machine at same time , it just split in two _________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
recedent
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 23-Apr-2016 22:39:17
| | [ #70 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 28-Jan-2010 Posts: 227
From: Tarnów | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 23-Apr-2016 22:48:07
| | [ #71 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9578
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @recedent, tlosm, Seiya
Sorry to ruin your benchmark contest, but I hope you know different Quake ports give different results even on the very same hardware... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 23-Apr-2016 23:06:21
| | [ #72 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @recedent
Mos on G5 2.7 ghz? faster fpu better result _________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 24-Apr-2016 2:02:23
| | [ #73 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1473
From: Italia | | |
|
| @recedent AROS?
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
iggy
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 24-Apr-2016 2:21:01
| | [ #74 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 20-Oct-2010 Posts: 1175
From: Bear, Delaware USA | | |
|
| @thread
While I appreciate the attempt to level the playing field, maybe just for a realistic comparison we ought to post benchmarks like Blender under Ubuntu Mate as well as under Amigoid OS'. It would give us an idea how much we are missing by not having SMP. Last edited by iggy on 24-Apr-2016 at 02:35 AM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 24-Apr-2016 7:52:22
| | [ #75 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9578
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @iggy
Again, different Blender versions give different (by degree of 100 %) results. You may run Blender benchmarks on Linux with one thread only to see single core performance. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 24-Apr-2016 7:59:42
| | [ #76 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9578
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 24-Apr-2016 8:20:53
| | [ #77 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @pavlor
I understand you point of view On Morphos X5000 the same quake version did less than 120 fps if i remember good. Is not an Os fight, it is just for have a little comparisons from cpus power. what i understand when the hardware advantage of cyrus is used the performances are really increased compared the quad g5. and i can say for sure we are watching less than 50% of the real machine power because kernel and components need to be fixed better this is on linux PPC. Nxp, alex perez and darren are really working hard to find the way for have the machine running at 100% of it possibilities Last edited by tlosm on 24-Apr-2016 at 08:22 AM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: General Benchmark (Linux and alternative OS) Posted on 24-Apr-2016 9:44:33
| | [ #78 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1473
From: Italia | | |
|
| @pavlor never mind, it is indicative result. i think everyone has seen that Quake give different result, but however give an idea how it run.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|