Click HereClick Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
5171 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

(Uses JAVA Applet and Port 1024)
Visit the Chatroom Website

Who's Online
 51 guest(s) on-line.
 4 member(s) on-line.


Mikey_C, Comi, SlayeR__, more...

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 SlayeR__:  57 secs ago
 vox:  1 min ago
 Mikey_C:  2 mins ago
 Comi:  3 mins ago
 Moxee:  5 mins ago
 terminills:  7 mins ago
 wawa:  8 mins ago
 eliyahu:  8 mins ago
 kyle:  9 mins ago
 Nori:  14 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  AROS Software
      /  Browser benchmarks
Register To Post

Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 Next Page )
PosterThread
nikosidis 
Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 20:00:54
#1 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 9-Dec-2008
Posts: 513
From: Norway, Oslo

Lets run some benchmarks. Hardware Toshiba lattitude pro A200. Celeron 1.6 GHz

First one out:

http://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9.1/sunspider-0.9.1/driver.html

I get 527,3 ms with Odyssey.

Last edited by nikosidis on 31-Mar-2012 at 08:23 PM.
Last edited by nikosidis on 31-Mar-2012 at 08:04 PM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Metalheart 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:10:31
#2 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 21-Aug-2003
Posts: 2598
From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains....

@nikosidis

501 on SAM460

_________________
Theres a time to live and a time to die
When its time to meet the maker
Theres a time to live but isnt it strange
That as soon as you're born you're dying

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tomazkid 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:16:36
#3 ]
Team Member
Joined: 31-Jul-2003
Posts: 11560
From: Kristianstad, Sweden

@Metalheart

407.3ms here. FF on W2K8R2.

_________________
Site admins are people too..pooff!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
nikosidis 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:18:57
#4 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 9-Dec-2008
Posts: 513
From: Norway, Oslo

can you paste it plz

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 537.4ms +/- 3.8%

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
nikosidis 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:21:43
#5 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 9-Dec-2008
Posts: 513
From: Norway, Oslo

@tomazkid

What hardware was that again ?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
nikosidis 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:30:48
#6 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 9-Dec-2008
Posts: 513
From: Norway, Oslo

@Metalheart

Lifeless piece of steel ;) Accept rules

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Cool_amigaN 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:32:24
#7 ]
Super Member
Joined: 6-Oct-2006
Posts: 1075
From: Athens/Greece

@nikosidis

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 488.8ms +/- 7.9%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 52.7ms +/- 6.6%
cube: 16.9ms +/- 16.0%
morph: 18.5ms +/- 5.2%
raytrace: 17.3ms +/- 11.0%

access: 58.7ms +/- 21.7%
binary-trees: 4.8ms +/- 30.4%
fannkuch: 33.1ms +/- 35.1%
nbody: 13.9ms +/- 25.8%
nsieve: 6.9ms +/- 10.3%

bitops: 19.8ms +/- 10.3%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 2.0ms +/- 0.0%
bits-in-byte: 3.0ms +/- 0.0%
bitwise-and: 3.5ms +/- 27.6%
nsieve-bits: 11.3ms +/- 18.4%

controlflow: 4.7ms +/- 12.5%
recursive: 4.7ms +/- 12.5%

crypto: 30.5ms +/- 29.6%
aes: 17.9ms +/- 27.2%
md5: 8.7ms +/- 80.0%
sha1: 3.9ms +/- 29.2%

date: 64.8ms +/- 15.3%
format-tofte: 25.0ms +/- 22.7%
format-xparb: 39.8ms +/- 23.5%

math: 73.8ms +/- 14.3%
cordic: 10.6ms +/- 15.0%
partial-sums: 56.6ms +/- 19.6%
spectral-norm: 6.6ms +/- 20.5%

regexp: 18.5ms +/- 18.9%
dna: 18.5ms +/- 18.9%

string: 165.3ms +/- 12.3%
base64: 13.6ms +/- 21.5%
fasta: 25.8ms +/- 10.1%
tagcloud: 45.3ms +/- 28.2%
unpack-code: 48.7ms +/- 31.9%
validate-input: 31.9ms +/- 17.1%

Hardware: HP Pavillion dv5 (3.5 years old), with Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.4Ghz / P8600, 3GB DDR2 @ 400Mhzm nVidia GF 9600GT, 320GB HD @ 7.200 RPM

OS: Widows 7 Ultimate 32Bit + SP1

Software: Opera 11.62

Note: To Opera's defend I have 72 tabs open :P

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tomazkid 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:36:22
#8 ]
Team Member
Joined: 31-Jul-2003
Posts: 11560
From: Kristianstad, Sweden

@nikosidis

Quote:
What hardware was that again ?


nothing unusual.
Pentium dual core @2.5 Ghz, 4Gb ram.

_________________
Site admins are people too..pooff!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tomazkid 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:38:09
#9 ]
Team Member
Joined: 31-Jul-2003
Posts: 11560
From: Kristianstad, Sweden

@Cool_amigaN

Only 20 tabs open here

FF 11 btw.

_________________
Site admins are people too..pooff!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
sicky 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 21:56:23
#10 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Mar-2003
Posts: 2726
From: Essex, UK

@nikosidis

Using my SAM460 running MUIOWB I got the following, don't know if it'd good or bad!

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 31994.1ms +/- 2.5%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 7368.9ms +/- 2.1%
cube: 2494.7ms +/- 0.9%
morph: 2591.7ms +/- 3.8%
raytrace: 2282.5ms +/- 2.7%

access: 4339.9ms +/- 1.4%
binary-trees: 282.8ms +/- 8.9%
fannkuch: 489.7ms +/- 2.3%
nbody: 3359.1ms +/- 0.9%
nsieve: 208.3ms +/- 10.4%

bitops: 1824.2ms +/- 8.0%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 236.6ms +/- 60.9%
bits-in-byte: 146.1ms +/- 5.6%
bitwise-and: 142.1ms +/- 2.3%
nsieve-bits: 1299.4ms +/- 3.0%

controlflow: 110.3ms +/- 10.5%
recursive: 110.3ms +/- 10.5%

crypto: 2425.4ms +/- 3.6%
aes: 505.9ms +/- 5.7%
md5: 901.4ms +/- 5.0%
sha1: 1018.1ms +/- 2.6%

date: 1759.7ms +/- 4.7%
format-tofte: 802.1ms +/- 2.5%
format-xparb: 957.6ms +/- 7.4%

math: 6870.0ms +/- 2.6%
cordic: 2835.6ms +/- 3.2%
partial-sums: 2450.4ms +/- 5.1%
spectral-norm: 1584.0ms +/- 0.9%

regexp: 1064.7ms +/- 0.7%
dna: 1064.7ms +/- 0.7%

string: 6231.0ms +/- 3.6%
base64: 1200.4ms +/- 4.9%
fasta: 1256.2ms +/- 12.5%
tagcloud: 916.4ms +/- 3.2%
unpack-code: 1619.8ms +/- 1.2%
validate-input: 1238.2ms +/- 1.0%

_________________
SAM 460 with 2GB or RAM, 1000GB HD, 4 port SATA, DVDRW drive and Radeon HD 4650 GFX card.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
nikosidis 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:00:10
#11 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 9-Dec-2008
Posts: 513
From: Norway, Oslo

@sicky

Well, it is bad compared to the others. Faster ms is better. Look at total.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:01:16
#12 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 3810
From: Unknown

@sicky

Not bad.

It seems Javascript on x86 is on another speed level in comparison to PowerPC (there is no fast JIT for PowerPC).

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
hotrod 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:05:47
#13 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Mar-2003
Posts: 2565
From: Stockholm, Sweden

255.8ms with FF 12. AMD 965

9891.7ms on my A1 G4 800MHz XE with muiowb lol

Last edited by hotrod on 31-Mar-2012 at 10:15 PM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
recedent 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:08:16
#14 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 28-Jan-2010
Posts: 152
From: Tarnów

@pavlor

"Not bad"? How about Mac Mini 1.5 GHz with MorphOS 2.7 and OWB 1.16 with:

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 4638.9ms +/- 2.3%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 623.2ms +/- 1.4%
cube: 188.2ms +/- 2.4%
morph: 255.9ms +/- 1.7%
raytrace: 179.1ms +/- 2.2%

access: 722.2ms +/- 9.9%
binary-trees: 96.4ms +/- 74.3%
fannkuch: 330.4ms +/- 0.6%
nbody: 191.4ms +/- 0.6%
nsieve: 104.0ms +/- 1.2%

bitops: 531.4ms +/- 1.8%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 104.8ms +/- 1.4%
bits-in-byte: 104.4ms +/- 0.7%
bitwise-and: 129.3ms +/- 1.2%
nsieve-bits: 192.9ms +/- 5.4%

controlflow: 74.2ms +/- 1.9%
recursive: 74.2ms +/- 1.9%

crypto: 289.8ms +/- 1.7%
aes: 135.0ms +/- 3.7%
md5: 77.0ms +/- 1.2%
sha1: 77.8ms +/- 1.7%

date: 306.0ms +/- 33.3%
format-tofte: 201.0ms +/- 46.1%
format-xparb: 105.0ms +/- 13.4%

math: 563.5ms +/- 1.0%
cordic: 191.4ms +/- 2.0%
partial-sums: 206.1ms +/- 1.4%
spectral-norm: 166.0ms +/- 1.0%

regexp: 610.7ms +/- 0.5%
dna: 610.7ms +/- 0.5%

string: 917.9ms +/- 9.3%
base64: 102.4ms +/- 6.9%
fasta: 153.9ms +/- 5.0%
tagcloud: 209.4ms +/- 33.2%
unpack-code: 327.4ms +/- 24.7%
validate-input: 124.8ms +/- 6.7%

(total time "only" 8 times faster)

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
wawa 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:11:28
#15 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 21-Jan-2008
Posts: 3497
From: Unknown

Total: 288.5ms +/- 1.9%
on an i7 (chrome)
dunno what it is gonna to prove?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:12:25
#16 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 3810
From: Unknown

@recedent

Quote:
"Not bad"? How about Mac Mini 1.5 GHz with MorphOS 2.7 and OWB 1.16 with:


Much better, but still nearly 10 times slower than 5 years old notebook...

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
nikosidis 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:17:33
#17 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 9-Dec-2008
Posts: 513
From: Norway, Oslo

@wawa

It proves kind of lot as most pages use java-script.

We can do other tests after this.

The fact is that as you can see AROS runs as fast and faster than any other OS out there.


Last edited by nikosidis on 31-Mar-2012 at 10:18 PM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
phoenixkonsole 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:30:11
#18 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 8-Nov-2009
Posts: 613
From: Unknown

@nikosidis
2.53GHZ Core2Duao
OS X 10.6.8
Safari 5.1.5

Now it would like to test latest AROS OWB on it

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 271.6ms +/- 1.4%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 38.3ms +/- 8.0%
cube: 12.6ms +/- 4.0%
morph: 11.8ms +/- 5.6%
raytrace: 13.9ms +/- 22.4%

access: 22.7ms +/- 3.0%
binary-trees: 3.4ms +/- 10.9%
fannkuch: 10.1ms +/- 4.0%
nbody: 5.2ms +/- 5.8%
nsieve: 4.0ms +/- 8.4%

bitops: 18.3ms +/- 1.9%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 1.2ms +/- 25.1%
bits-in-byte: 5.9ms +/- 3.8%
bitwise-and: 4.2ms +/- 7.2%
nsieve-bits: 7.0ms +/- 0.0%

controlflow: 3.7ms +/- 9.3%
recursive: 3.7ms +/- 9.3%

crypto: 19.3ms +/- 5.0%
aes: 12.8ms +/- 4.4%
md5: 3.3ms +/- 10.5%
sha1: 3.2ms +/- 9.4%

date: 37.3ms +/- 2.0%
format-tofte: 19.3ms +/- 2.5%
format-xparb: 18.0ms +/- 3.2%

math: 26.2ms +/- 1.7%
cordic: 8.9ms +/- 2.5%
partial-sums: 14.0ms +/- 3.4%
spectral-norm: 3.3ms +/- 10.5%

regexp: 14.9ms +/- 2.7%
dna: 14.9ms +/- 2.7%

string: 90.9ms +/- 2.2%
base64: 8.6ms +/- 10.5%
fasta: 12.3ms +/- 2.8%
tagcloud: 19.5ms +/- 1.9%
unpack-code: 36.0ms +/- 2.5%
validate-input: 14.5ms +/- 5.8%

_________________
x86 aros powerhorseAresOne
AROS Broadway - get the most out of Imica and AresOne

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Spectre660 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 22:30:24
#19 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 5-Jun-2005
Posts: 2457
From: Unknown

@nikosidis

Sam440ep-Flex 800 Mhz MUI-OWB 1.9


============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 29862.8ms +/- 0.9%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 6410.8ms +/- 1.0%
cube: 1546.2ms +/- 4.8%
morph: 2954.9ms +/- 1.1%
raytrace: 1909.7ms +/- 1.3%

access: 3477.4ms +/- 3.4%
binary-trees: 187.3ms +/- 41.0%
fannkuch: 854.9ms +/- 3.6%
nbody: 2148.9ms +/- 3.0%
nsieve: 286.3ms +/- 18.4%

bitops: 1666.1ms +/- 5.0%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 257.1ms +/- 17.6%
bits-in-byte: 224.2ms +/- 18.1%
bitwise-and: 263.8ms +/- 18.7%
nsieve-bits: 921.0ms +/- 7.5%

controlflow: 192.3ms +/- 27.4%
recursive: 192.3ms +/- 27.4%

crypto: 2303.1ms +/- 4.6%
aes: 616.1ms +/- 10.9%
md5: 750.1ms +/- 7.8%
sha1: 936.9ms +/- 3.3%

date: 2041.1ms +/- 1.8%
format-tofte: 974.7ms +/- 1.4%
format-xparb: 1066.4ms +/- 3.0%

math: 4746.6ms +/- 6.4%
cordic: 1561.4ms +/- 16.1%
partial-sums: 1652.2ms +/- 6.4%
spectral-norm: 1533.0ms +/- 8.0%

regexp: 1912.9ms +/- 0.8%
dna: 1912.9ms +/- 0.8%

string: 7112.5ms +/- 1.8%
base64: 1208.3ms +/- 6.5%
fasta: 1345.3ms +/- 6.4%
tagcloud: 908.6ms +/- 0.9%
unpack-code: 2125.0ms +/- 1.6%
validate-input: 1525.3ms +/- 6.6%

Last edited by Spectre660 on 31-Mar-2012 at 10:32 PM.

_________________
Sam440ep-Flex 800Mhz ,1GB.Radeon HD6670 lowprofile via PCI to PCIe Adaper.
Sam460ex 1.15Ghz, 2GB.Radeon HD6670 . Apex TM-302-3 Case

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
itix 
Re: Browser benchmarks
Posted on 31-Mar-2012 23:02:40
#20 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 22-Dec-2004
Posts: 2595
From: Freedom world

@pavlor

Here are my results from Mac Mini G4 @ 1.5 GHz running MorphOS 2.7 and OWB 1.14:

Quote:

============================================
RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total: 4079.1ms +/- 0.3%
--------------------------------------------

3d: 601.8ms +/- 1.0%
cube: 176.6ms +/- 1.4%
morph: 250.3ms +/- 0.7%
raytrace: 174.9ms +/- 3.8%

access: 647.2ms +/- 0.4%
binary-trees: 50.1ms +/- 0.8%
fannkuch: 313.5ms +/- 0.2%
nbody: 188.1ms +/- 1.1%
nsieve: 95.5ms +/- 0.7%

bitops: 464.1ms +/- 0.4%
3bit-bits-in-byte: 90.9ms +/- 1.5%
bits-in-byte: 87.2ms +/- 0.3%
bitwise-and: 119.7ms +/- 0.3%
nsieve-bits: 166.3ms +/- 1.1%

controlflow: 70.4ms +/- 1.0%
recursive: 70.4ms +/- 1.0%

crypto: 259.0ms +/- 0.5%
aes: 116.4ms +/- 0.6%
md5: 70.8ms +/- 1.6%
sha1: 71.8ms +/- 0.6%

date: 205.7ms +/- 3.1%
format-tofte: 126.2ms +/- 4.3%
format-xparb: 79.5ms +/- 2.9%

math: 544.2ms +/- 0.4%
cordic: 181.0ms +/- 0.7%
partial-sums: 200.7ms +/- 0.6%
spectral-norm: 162.5ms +/- 1.4%

regexp: 545.4ms +/- 0.2%
dna: 545.4ms +/- 0.2%

string: 741.3ms +/- 0.9%
base64: 108.7ms +/- 1.8%
fasta: 133.9ms +/- 1.1%
tagcloud: 149.1ms +/- 0.6%
unpack-code: 234.5ms +/- 1.1%
validate-input: 115.1ms +/- 2.1%

_________________
Free IRC client for Amiga: www.amirc.org

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  

[ home ][ about us ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright © 2000 - 2011 Amigaworld.net.

Page took 0.143414 seconds to load.