It's said that Windows can do up to 108, Mac up to 150 and Linux is shown here running 165. And Amiga? Have you ever tried?

Of course, I don't know exact configs of these machines, so if you do any test, please post your config and specs.

Saluditos,

Ferrán.

Last edited by Ferry on 11-Apr-2008 at 01:31 PM.

_________________
Amiga user since 1988
AOS4 Betatester
Member of ATO Spain
A1 Cfg
OS4 SCR
A1200

@Ferry

Isn't it down to CPU and RAM nothing more? Surely windows could run 1000 apps if it had tons of RAM?

_________________
Amiga A1200, 3.1 ROMs, Blizzard 1230 MKIV 64MB & FPU, 4GB DoM SSD, Workbench 3.1

@Ferry

Personally I do not see the point in that linux video, as it doesn't really prove anything. For example, I just ran 100 instances of "Clock". Along with the other programs that run as part of the boot up normally, this puts my Amiga running over 110-120 "applications". Sure it isn't particularly responsive at this point, but it doesn't prove anything other than I can run 120+ things at the same time - which is the point in a multitasking system isn't it?

_________________
Test sig (new)

@_Steve_

It still gives some idea. On Amiga 1200 you can not practically have move than 10 windows opened at the same time. Amiga layers system is slow that it starts choking while applications are using no cpu time at all.

_________________
Amiga Developer
Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook

@Ferry

Quote:

Ferry wrote: It's said that Windows can do up to 108, Mac up to 150 and Linux is shown here running 165. And Amiga? Have you ever tried? Of course, I don't know exact configs of these machines, so if you do any test, please post your config and specs. Saluditos, Ferrán.

Depends on what kind of application and the amount of ram and such. I am however pretty damn sure that AmigaOS can do way more apps at the same time providing you have around the same hardware specs thanks to AmigaOS using very little resources which leaves more ram for apps/games.

But you can pretty much forget comparing a classic amiga with a modern pc.

Last edited by Tomas on 11-Apr-2008 at 04:12 PM.

@itix
Quote:

On Amiga 1200 you can not practically have move than 10 windows opened at the same time. Amiga layers system is slow that it starts choking while applications are using no cpu time at all.

Not every program has a window, and single program can have many windows.

But they are not necessarily on the same screen.

@Tomas

Quote:

Depends on what kind of application and the amount of ram and such..

You're right. It is a nonsense to ask how many applications you can open at the same time. Another question could be : how many applications are really working at the same time ? I don't find win very good at this game.

Luca

@lucaricossa

More important than how many apps are running, is how usable the machine is while doing that.
If you run 1000 programs and have to wait 10000 minutes to move the mouse, what exactly is your gain? ;)))

@Ferry

Well, I got 1308 running before I got tired in my arm... ;)
http://hem.bredband.net/deniil/pics/ManyPrograms.jpg

As you can see I started a couple of Calculators. I have 512MB RAM with 260MB free when I started and 73MB free when I quit. Aas you can (perhaps not quite) see by Scout every calculator also got one CON and One KingCON process started. Each with 32kB stack.

Guess Amiga wins

(No seriously. Amiga has no limit except for memory, which is 4GB. Linux has a limit in its PIDs which are short (16-bit, 64k) or long (4G), or perhaps long long (16E). Windoze, I don't know. Mac=UNIX..?)

_________________
- Don't get fooled by my avatar, I'm not like that (anymore, mostly... maybe only sometimes)
> Amiga Classic and OS4 developer for OnyxSoft.

@Ferry

Surely quality over quantity is better? I would be far more impressed to see 1 Firefox window on the Amiga than 1300 copies of calculator...

Last edited by Benji on 11-Apr-2008 at 11:46 PM.

@Deniil715

LOL I love it.

Anyways I tried that on my windows xp system. I got 116 windows calculators open, then windows refused to open any more. Can anyone else go higher?

I can't even control alt delete with that many open! HAHAHA
I also had firefox open but thats it.

With task manager open I can't reopen the 1 calculator I closed to get task opened. No other programs will launch now. And task manager is not showing me any performance info.
To get performance to show Only 114 calcs can run, and I have 1.4 gig still available and no other program will launch. i love MS!! NOT!!!

Amiga WIns!!


XP Home
with 2.6ghz cpu, and 2 gig ram.

_________________
“Wouldn't it be much worse if life were fair and all the terrible things that happen to us, come because actually deserve them? So now I take comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the Universe”

@Deniil715

LOL! Brilliant!

_________________
After a decade away from the scene, I am back!

@Ferry

The Amiga is the first to do so.
And it's still the best to do so.

_________________
---------
AmigaClyde

µA1-C 750GX@800 using OS4.1

@AmigaClyde

There were PMT OS's in use long, long, long before AmigaOS. And the Amiga is far from best *cough*nomemoryprotection*cough*.

_________________
The problem with AmigaOS on PPC isn't that PPC is big-endian. The problem with AmigaOS on PPC is that PPC is dead-endian.

@TheDungeonDelver

Quote:

TheDungeonDelver wrote: @AmigaClyde There were PMT OS's in use long, long, long before AmigaOS. And the Amiga is far from best *cough*nomemoryprotection*cough*.

not on your personal computer there wasnt.... what PMT OS did you have at your house pre amiga?

_________________
In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

http://ozconspiracyhouse.myfastforum.org

@Deniil715

Quote:

Well, I got 1308 running before I got tired in my arm... ;)

and

Quote:

every calculator also got one CON and One KingCON process started.

And in total, you had "only" 1308 processes. So as each calculator takes up 3 processes, I'm afraid you "only" managed to start 400-something of them :)

@eniacfoa

The CoCo and British "Dragon" systems both ran OS9.

_________________
The problem with AmigaOS on PPC isn't that PPC is big-endian. The problem with AmigaOS on PPC is that PPC is dead-endian.

@eniacfoa

Quote:

not on your personal computer there wasnt.... what PMT OS did you have at your house pre amiga?

If that is the generic "you", then both OS9 on the TRS80 and QDOS on the Sinclair QL predate the first Amiga.


If it is the specific "you" (i.e. "me"), then it's a pointless question --- because then, by the same logic, I could claim that the VZ200 was the first home computer, ever, the MTX500 was the first to come with a well-documented user-port, and the 386SX was the first PC.

@umisef

Quote:

umisef wrote: @Deniil715 Quote: Well, I got 1308 running before I got tired in my arm... ;) and Quote: every calculator also got one CON and One KingCON process started. And in total, you had "only" 1308 processes. So as each calculator takes up 3 processes, I'm afraid you "only" managed to start 400-something of them :)

Even if it´s only 400 apps, it´s x3+ times more than Windows can (Frostwolf test)

Last edited by Fransexy on 12-Apr-2008 at 08:31 AM.

_________________
No PowerPC, No Fun
Make Amiga Great Again

@Fransexy

lab here
run sys:utilities/calculator
skip here back

=> 521 calculators running here and then I ran out of memory (I had Dopus and other apps in the background)

_________________
Philippe 'Elwood' Ferrucci
Sam460 1.10 Ghz
AmigaOS 4 betatester
Amiga Translator Organisation