| Poster | Thread |
 Seiya
|  |
PowerPC Benchmark with Linux or AmigaOS (and amigaos like)
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 19:49:21
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member
 |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006
Posts: 1474
From: Italia | | |
|
| CPU vs CPU & FPU vs FPU
Rendering:
Blender (the benchmark)
BoingCube
Internet features:
Peacepeeker
Emulation:
Dosbox: test with Quake
Macintosh 68k: you have to test Speedometer on preferably MacOS 8
How to test:
Blender:
you have open the file proposed and hit F12.
you can change in "performance settings" the number of core (threads)
BoingCube:
boingcube -benchmark
Speedometer:
look at the comparison with Quadra 605 (this is indicated at bottom of speedometer panel after completed all tests)
Quake:
Open a shell and write:
timedemo demo2 or timedemo demo1
Last edited by Seiya on 11-Apr-2016 at 07:15 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 10-Apr-2016 at 01:02 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 10-Apr-2016 at 12:12 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 10-Apr-2016 at 12:11 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 10-Apr-2016 at 12:08 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 09-Apr-2016 at 09:04 AM.
Last edited by Seiya on 08-Apr-2016 at 06:50 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 07-Apr-2016 at 07:21 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 07-Apr-2016 at 07:19 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 07-Apr-2016 at 11:26 AM.
Last edited by Seiya on 07-Apr-2016 at 11:15 AM.
Last edited by Seiya on 07-Apr-2016 at 11:06 AM.
Last edited by Seiya on 06-Apr-2016 at 03:19 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 05-Apr-2016 at 07:03 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 05-Apr-2016 at 01:21 PM.
Last edited by Seiya on 02-Apr-2016 at 08:34 PM.
_________________
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 | |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 19:56:26
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
 |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2341
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @Seiya
+1 _________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Shamron
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 21:39:16
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Member
 |
Joined: 25-Jun-2014
Posts: 15
From: Norway | | |
|
| @Tuxedo
My penis brings all the bous to the yard, X1000, harder than y'all cann a'fard... |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
amitv
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 21:51:27
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member
 |
Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Posts: 346
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Test test test
 |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
TRIPOS
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 22:09:56
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member
|
Joined: 4-Apr-2014
Posts: 1205
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Seiya
Quote:
Seiya wrote:
dual core vs dual core |
Why?
 |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 22:36:14
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
|
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Seiya
sorry ... but x5000 win 
and in some software kill the g5 2.5ghz too ... example dosbox and mame Last edited by tlosm on 28-Mar-2016 at 10:36 PM.
_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Rob
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 22:46:07
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
|
Joined: 20-Mar-2003
Posts: 6351
From: S.Wales | | |
|
| @TRIPOS
Probably because you can. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
kamelito
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 22:54:15
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member
 |
Joined: 26-Jul-2004
Posts: 815
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Since you can't buy X1000 anymore I don't see the point, it will be X5000 or not X5000.
Kamelito |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Zylesea
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 28-Mar-2016 23:07:09
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
|
Joined: 16-Mar-2004
Posts: 2263
From: Ostwestfalen, FRG | | |
|
| Who's deader than the other?
Both overpriced and doomed technology.
_________________
My programs: via.bckrs.de
MorphOS user since V0.4 (2001) |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 1:58:43
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member
|
Joined: 19-Aug-2006
Posts: 1474
From: Italia | | |
|
| @tlsom
you said x5000 is faster than X and Y, but show it
Do you have fear to make 3 test on Linux?
i, we, don't ask to test AmigaOS4, but ask you to test Linux that is much, mega much better than OS4
_________________
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
eder
 | |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 5:56:11
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member
|
Joined: 16-Mar-2004
Posts: 280
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tlosm
Great, cant Wait to buy the X5000. It is about time i sell /scrap my peg2 Quote:
tlosm wrote:
@Seiya
sorry ... but x5000 win
and in some software kill the g5 2.5ghz too ... example dosbox and mame |
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 6:08:58
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Seiya
you like to compare melons with bananas....
first gallium/mesa with gallium test is possible if the two people have:
the same video board, the same distro, the same kernel version , the same xorg version and the same version of mesa... about the same mesa versions the two machine have to build with the same gcc and with the same ./configure options...
in any way on my x5000 config with radeon 6570 hd i have 1980/2010 glxgears fps this is on mate 16.04 with last kernel 4.6 rc1-LB with mesa 11.3 dev
ask to who have an x1000 if have a better result.
about cpu vs cpu i had been share the prometeus4 mplayer compare it with what you need.
i continue say the p5020 2ghz is faster in integer compared with g5 2.5ghz . in fpu is like the x1000.
and what im writing is concerning a distros/kernel who need to be better optimized for the cyrus board who is new hardware for linux too. expecting better result there too.
about software testing.
mame is faster than g5 quad
dosbox is faster than the g5 quad
qemu run slower than the quad but i think it is because sone configure option i have to check if mabi is altivec there and make the x5000 goes in emulation.
video i can play 1080p mkv ac3 on mplayer
quakespasm gave about 100fps more than g5 quad but dont thake it as a real result because i need to test again quakespasm with last distros because my top of message reasons.
i can play now with my last kernel revision 720p youtube in firefox with 120 framedrops on 6000 frames total.
amigaos for me is ot because im nda ... but you can see it run from trevor videos on youtube Last edited by tlosm on 29-Mar-2016 at 06:24 AM.
Last edited by tlosm on 29-Mar-2016 at 06:16 AM.
Last edited by tlosm on 29-Mar-2016 at 06:09 AM.
_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 6:28:18
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @eder
peggy2 is a wonderful machine i loved it too much... but yes x5000 is faster compared it _________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
resle
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 7:04:52
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member
|
Joined: 28-Nov-2005
Posts: 500
From: shanghai | | |
|
| @Seiya
Here's the difference beween X1000 and X5000:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Last edited by resle on 29-Mar-2016 at 07:06 AM.
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 9:54:49
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member
|
Joined: 19-Aug-2006
Posts: 1474
From: Italia | | |
|
| @tlosm
Make blender test
However in your test you compare melons with bananas with g5 vs x5000. _________________
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 10:35:37
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
|
Joined: 14-Mar-2003
Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
zzd10h
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 12:15:34
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Amiga Developer Team
 |
Joined: 21-May-2012
Posts: 1077
From: France | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 | |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 12:25:53
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 5-Jun-2005
Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @zzd10h
Glxgears is not a good indicator of actual performance.
On my Tabor with Radeon HD6670 I get about 359 FPS.
Quote:
zzd10h wrote:
@tlosm
"in any way on my x5000 config with radeon 6570 hd i have 1980/2010 glxgears fps this is on mate 16.04 with last kernel 4.6 rc1-LB with mesa 11.3 dev
ask to who have an x1000 if have a better result."
On my X1000 - Radeon 6670 - Kernel 4.6.0 alpha2 - Mate 16.04 - Mesa 10.0.4, I have only around 320 fps
So, at least under glxgears Linux, X5000 seems far better than X1000.
http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.biz/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=2137&start=70#p37250
|
Last edited by Spectre660 on 29-Mar-2016 at 12:31 PM.
_________________
Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 13:29:02
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Spectre660
Blender 2.72 X5000 2T = time:1.29.03 ... and the kernel is in beta... exactly 2 months ago i had more than 3 minutes... hope you will understand the KERNEL IS IN BETA!
@guillaume
i think you need some tricks for better glx performances there ... look like more an old radeon card.
If you need i can help you building better mesa _________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Rose
| |
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 29-Mar-2016 13:55:05
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member
|
Joined: 5-Nov-2009
Posts: 982
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
11 crawler(s) on-line.
131 guest(s) on-line.
0 member(s) on-line.
