Poster | Thread |
g01df1sh
| |
Super Amiga Posted on 25-Jan-2017 13:50:06
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 16-Apr-2009 Posts: 1777
From: UK | | |
|
| Hi all
Most likely no chance and dam expensive but wouldn't it be nice. OS 4/5 on this
https://www.raptorengineering.com/TALOS/prerelease.php
_________________ A1200 ACA1232 128MB Indivison MkIICr Elbox empty Power Tower RPi3 Emulating C64 ZX Atari PS BBC Wii with Amiga emulation Vampire v4 SA |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
WolfpackN64
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 25-Jan-2017 14:40:19
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 9-Oct-2016 Posts: 300
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @g01df1sh
They had a crowdfunding campaign but it failed (they got over 500 000$, but they asked 3.7 Million $). Frankly they asked way too much (3700$ for the motherboard WITHOUT CPU, RAM or anything, and at least 1000$ for a CPU).
A full system was going to be around 7000$, which is insane (for reference, the cheapest Tyan reference OpenPOWER server is around 2800$, and that's with CPU, RAM, Storage and PSU).
To be honest, for a full POWER CPU to be used by an Amiga system, they need multicore and multithread support. These CPU's are massively parallelized (and massively powerful). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
g01df1sh
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 25-Jan-2017 14:48:30
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 16-Apr-2009 Posts: 1777
From: UK | | |
|
| @WolfpackN64
Will Os4.2 ever get here ? _________________ A1200 ACA1232 128MB Indivison MkIICr Elbox empty Power Tower RPi3 Emulating C64 ZX Atari PS BBC Wii with Amiga emulation Vampire v4 SA |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
WolfpackN64
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 25-Jan-2017 14:57:54
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 9-Oct-2016 Posts: 300
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @g01df1sh
I don't know. I think it's possible seeing as how Mac OS 9, a cooperative multitasking system managed to get multicore support (but it had to be specifically enabled app per app). And that OS is probably one of the most hacked together OS' in existance (PPC nanokernel, 68k userspace). But I don't think it'll be easy.
It'll all depend on Hyperion. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ne_one
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 25-Jan-2017 23:19:57
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 13-Jun-2005 Posts: 905
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @WolfpackN64
Quote:
I think it's possible seeing as how Mac OS 9, a cooperative multitasking system managed to get multicore support (but it had to be specifically enabled app per app). And that OS is probably one of the most hacked together OS' in existance (PPC nanokernel, 68k userspace). But I don't think it'll be easy. |
Why would you even want to go through the agony of retrofitting a 30-year-old OS with features that aren't driven by any real software demand?
This whole project is an overly-ambitious pipe dream that bases most of its motivation on anti-x86 hysteria.
The last thing the Amiga needs is another low-volume, expensive hardware solution that uses a dead CPU.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Rose
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 25-Jan-2017 23:51:22
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 5-Nov-2009 Posts: 982
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @WolfpackN64
Quote:
A full system was going to be around 7000$, which is insane (for reference, the cheapest Tyan reference OpenPOWER server is around 2800$, and that's with CPU, RAM, Storage and PSU). |
That $7100 system was still without CPU. Only option which they offered with CPU was $17600.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaBlitter
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 5:48:45
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 26-Sep-2005 Posts: 3513
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
WolfpackN64
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 7:33:04
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 9-Oct-2016 Posts: 300
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ne_one
Because multitasking is something OS4 will really need down the lane to accommodate more complicated and resource hungry software. Well, your critique is seemingly anti-POWER, it's a matter of perspective. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Thorham
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 7:35:25
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 5-Mar-2014 Posts: 183
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Super Amiga? Where? This machine certainly has NOTHING to do with Amiga at all. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
WolfpackN64
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 10:54:30
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 9-Oct-2016 Posts: 300
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Thorham
It's hypothetical. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 11:02:33
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @AmigaBlitter
it is a rack , the talos is a complete workstation with pcie expansions slots etc etc
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Raffaele
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 11:06:16
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 7-Dec-2005 Posts: 1906
From: Naples, Italy | | |
|
| @WolfpackN64
Quote:
WolfpackN64 wrote: @g01df1sh
They had a crowdfunding campaign but it failed (they got over 500 000$, but they asked 3.7 Million $). Frankly they asked way too much (3700$ for the motherboard WITHOUT CPU, RAM or anything, and at least 1000$ for a CPU).
A full system was going to be around 7000$, which is insane (for reference, the cheapest Tyan reference OpenPOWER server is around 2800$, and that's with CPU, RAM, Storage and PSU).
To be honest, for a full POWER CPU to be used by an Amiga system, they need multicore and multithread support. These CPU's are massively parallelized (and massively powerful). |
With just 200.000 bucks, we users of Amiga community had had engineered our own LowCost Amiga computer and with other 100.000 we had had produced a batch of 500/1000 motherboards at a manufacturer in China... _________________ "When the Amiga came out, everyone [at Apple] was scared as hell." (J.L. Gassée, former CEO of Apple France and chief of devs of Mac II-fx, interviewed by Amazing Computing, Nov 1996). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
WolfpackN64
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 11:31:58
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 9-Oct-2016 Posts: 300
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Raffaele
You could just as well produce these in Italy or the UK, but you could do a LOT with 500 000$. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
WolfpackN64
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 11:33:24
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 9-Oct-2016 Posts: 300
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tlosm
The Tyan reference server also has PCIe expendability. Having no PCIe or CAPI on an OpenPOWER server would be a waste (since they're also designed for GPU and FPGA acceleration). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 16:01:08
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11211
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @Thorham
Yes I thought it was about a Super Amiga with the Super AGA chipset. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Jose
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 18:09:38
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 992
From: Unknown | | |
|
| That would be a true "Power Amiga" ! I think it would be awesome but it's more of a niche due to cost and power requirements. Most everyday tasks don't need that amount of power. Nevertheless I still would drool for one with full MP AmigaOS kernel :)
_________________
José |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
g01df1sh
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 18:52:15
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 16-Apr-2009 Posts: 1777
From: UK | | |
|
| @Hypex
Super AGA is coming I hope stand alone Vampire FPGA. Cant wait to see that just hope its not another BoXer pipe dream.
_________________ A1200 ACA1232 128MB Indivison MkIICr Elbox empty Power Tower RPi3 Emulating C64 ZX Atari PS BBC Wii with Amiga emulation Vampire v4 SA |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Rob
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 19:06:30
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 20-Mar-2003 Posts: 6351
From: S.Wales | | |
|
| @Jose
Quote:
That would be a true "Power Amiga" ! I think it would be awesome but it's more of a niche due to cost and power requirements. Most everyday tasks don't need that amount of power. |
The TDPs are huge. Amiga OS4.x would have to gain some power management functionality so it could switch off what is being used in order to get the power down. Do 4 core Power 8 chips exist? That wouldn't be so bad for OS, especially if it could switch unused cores off.
I wonder if there's room in the market for A-EON to build a Power 8 system. |
|
Status: Online! |
|
|
WolfpackN64
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 19:13:30
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 9-Oct-2016 Posts: 300
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Rob
There is a 4-core Power8 chip. An 8 core generally uses 130W, and I think the 4-core is around 90W. I do think Power9 would be nice if it would have a 4-core chip, they stand to gain a big IPC leap and the added effiëncy of the 14nm process will make the Power chips quite efficiënt. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Rose
| |
Re: Super Amiga Posted on 26-Jan-2017 19:27:37
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 5-Nov-2009 Posts: 982
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @WolfpackN64
Quote:
There is a 4-core Power8 chip. An 8 core generally uses 130W, and I think the 4-core is around 90W. |
Nope, 4-core POWER8 Turismo SCM 130W. 8-Core's are 190W on normal freq and 247W on turbo. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|