| Poster | Thread |
 CodeSmith
|  |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 8-Sep-2007 2:15:56
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
 |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 3045
From: USA | | |
|
| @Joerg
If I may ask, since "the rest of us" don't have access to the new SDK... you put the mutexes in for build 274 and pulled them out again in build 275. Can you explain why? (without breaking NDA, of course  ) |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Foody
| |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 8-Sep-2007 2:44:45
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member
 |
Joined: 3-Sep-2003
Posts: 1467
From: Canada | | |
|
| Amazing you can rearrange the NDA into DNA. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Kicko
 | |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 8-Sep-2007 9:08:52
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
|
Joined: 19-Jun-2004
Posts: 5009
From: Sweden | | |
|
| @codesmith
Its because he dont have any more ideas what to implement so he at least can rise the version number ;)
EDIT: 1.276 is out now :) Last edited by Kicko on 08-Sep-2007 at 04:30 PM.
Last edited by Kicko on 08-Sep-2007 at 04:30 PM.
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
ZeroG
| |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 8-Sep-2007 9:30:05
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member
 |
Joined: 16-Jul-2004
Posts: 544
From: Germany | | |
|
| @CodeSmith:
http://www.amigans.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=1071&start=20
Quote:
joerg wrote:
2 OS4 beta testers had problems with SFS version 1.274 hanging on heavy usage and I thought I found a bug in the OS4 Mutex code, but I was wrong and the OS4 Mutex functions are correct. I can't reproduce the problems myself and I don't know yet what the actual problem is, but it's probably a bug the current beta versions of diskcache.library (not in the public version) and not in SFS or OS4.
|
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Stephen_Robinson
| |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 8-Sep-2007 9:32:46
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member
|
Joined: 29-Apr-2005
Posts: 1991
From: UK | | |
|
| "'SFS/2' (0x53465302), i.e. to use both 'SFS\0' and 'SFS\2' "
/ or \ ???
My Amiupdate got me this a few days ago, which was nice. Last edited by Stephen_Robinson on 08-Sep-2007 at 09:33 AM.
_________________
Rage quited 29th May 2011
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
CodeSmith
| |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 8-Sep-2007 11:19:30
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 3045
From: USA | | |
|
| @ZeroG
Thanks. I hate that kind of bug (reproduces at a customer's site but not in one's lab), and I wish Joerg the best of luck hunting it down. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
ZeroG
| |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 8-Sep-2007 14:22:55
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member
|
Joined: 16-Jul-2004
Posts: 544
From: Germany | | |
|
| @Stephen_Robinson
\.
But this does not matter, you have to enter the hexnumber in MTB to setup a SFS\2 partition. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
cope
| |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 29-Oct-2007 5:37:08
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member
|
Joined: 18-Feb-2004
Posts: 540
From: Eldorado, ON | | |
|
| I am trying to setup one of my partitions as a SFS2 since it id 59G. All the SFS0 partions are working well. I did not see anything in Toak's manual about this can this be done? If so how?
Thanks,
John Paul Last edited by cope on 29-Oct-2007 at 11:56 AM.
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
cope
| |
Re: SFS (1.275) released
Posted on 29-Oct-2007 11:58:09
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member
|
Joined: 18-Feb-2004
Posts: 540
From: Eldorado, ON | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
23 crawler(s) on-line.
68 guest(s) on-line.
1 member(s) on-line.
