Poster | Thread |
delshay
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 19-Nov-2012 19:03:09
| | [ #81 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 20-Sep-2008 Posts: 447
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Comment moved to link in thread. Last edited by delshay on 20-Nov-2012 at 06:35 PM. Last edited by delshay on 19-Nov-2012 at 07:18 PM. Last edited by delshay on 19-Nov-2012 at 07:04 PM.
_________________ The Machine: Bride Of The Pin•Bot by Williams Electronics |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
delshay
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 1-Jan-2013 12:20:52
| | [ #82 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 20-Sep-2008 Posts: 447
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Blizzard PPC sets new world record for dram bandwidth and reads as follows.
Read 32: 101Mb/sec Read 64: 105Mb/sec
Write 32 & 64 58Mb/sec Write 116Mb/sec ( tricky )
NEW for 2013
PCI BUS working for the first time & operates at half the speed of the PPC processor and also set a new world record for this card 41.5Mhz.
Bvision Sgram 120Mhz but can operate well beyond this frequency if needed. Last edited by delshay on 01-Jan-2013 at 12:24 PM. Last edited by delshay on 01-Jan-2013 at 12:22 PM.
_________________ The Machine: Bride Of The Pin•Bot by Williams Electronics |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ribdevil
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 1-Jan-2013 22:05:26
| | [ #83 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 22-Jan-2010 Posts: 260
From: Vigo - Galicia - Spain | | |
|
| @Spectre660
Quote:
Spectre660 wrote:
The low write64 results have been fixed with New Uboot and patches etc
RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010
CPU: AMCC PPC440EP 1.3 @ 799 Mhz Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none Cache Line: 128
---> CPU --- MAX MIPS: 1598
|
Hi Spectre, I can't obtain this marks in my SAM440 @ 800 MHz and 1GB RAM. The first diference is Cache Line, you get 128 and my board only 32. So all the others numbers are lower, example MIPS 1598 vs 1322.
Do you know why ?
I have all the UBoot updates installed and the sam440ep_setup patch in the starup.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 1-Jan-2013 23:46:54
| | [ #84 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ribdevil
The newest sam440ep_setup causes ragemem to give some incorret results in the MIPS.
I get cache line 32 as well and Mips 1365
Last edited by Spectre660 on 01-Jan-2013 at 11:48 PM.
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ribdevil
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 2-Jan-2013 13:35:39
| | [ #85 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 22-Jan-2010 Posts: 260
From: Vigo - Galicia - Spain | | |
|
| @Spectre660
Thanks for the info.
Happy New Year. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 2-Jan-2013 14:34:46
| | [ #86 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ribdevil
No pronblem. And happy New Year to you.
Quote:
ribdevil wrote: @Spectre660
Thanks for the info.
Happy New Year. |
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
logicalheart
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 9-Jun-2013 19:45:25
| | [ #87 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 2-Dec-2003 Posts: 695
From: Sandy, Utah. USA | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
 |  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 28-Sep-2013 22:10:54
| | [ #88 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3725
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @logicalheart
Hmmm ... PA Semi is as we have seen in past about as G4 with CPU, but memory results are impressive. Video card is Radeon HD 6870 1GB, AmigaOS 4.1.6
CPU: P.A. Semi PWRficient PA6T-1682M B1 @ 1800 Mhz Caches Sizes: L1: 64 KB - L2: 2048 KB - L3: none Cache Line: 64
CPU Max MIPS 3084
L1 Read32: 6850 MB/s Read64: 13677 MB/s Write32: 6850 MB/s Write64: 13676 MB/s
L2 Read32: 3271 MB/s Read64: 4960 MB/s Write32: 2541 MB/s Write64: 4085 MB/s
RAM READ32: 2860 MB/s READ64: 4002 MB/s WRITE32: 2731 MB/s WRITE64: 3388 MB/s WRITE: 352 MB/s (Tricky)
VIDEO BUS READ: 74 MB/s WRITE: 161MB/s
_________________ Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 29-Sep-2013 18:29:30
| | [ #89 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1462
From: Italia | | |
|
| ragemem is not a valid benchmark ..these result don't rappresente how a program will work with the real apps. you have to use real programs..but today is like to ask the moon
Ragemem is good only to see some syntetic benchmark and to can say: wow, how is fast my machine.. On the real apps instead you can say: oh no..what happens!?
Last edited by Seiya on 29-Sep-2013 at 06:33 PM. Last edited by Seiya on 29-Sep-2013 at 06:32 PM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 29-Sep-2013 18:50:50
| | [ #90 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9526
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Seiya
Quote:
ragemem is not a valid benchmark .. |
As valid as any other. But you are right, I too don´t believe benchmarks I didn´t forge myself. 
Edit: Superior memory performance of PA6T in comparison to G4 shows also MPlayer benchmark. Comparison to newer e600 based designs (8610/8640) would be interesting.Last edited by pavlor on 29-Sep-2013 at 07:01 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 29-Sep-2013 21:31:45
| | [ #91 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2744
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @pavlor
i been use ragemem under sysmon from gulliaume bosel, test and comparing the ng machine.
one of the best benchmark for me remain "quake in software rendering" for the cpu and the gl for the gpu 8)
My machine tests Quake software 320x240 Imac 2xI7 (4x2 thread) 1560 fps Amiga 4k 060 66mhz 11.7 fps Amiga 4k 604e 366mhz 36.5 fps Amiga 4k 604e 200mhz 27 fps Sam460 1017mhz (320x480) 78.5 fps Pegasos 2 G4 1ghz 145.3 fps
Some shots are here
http://amiga.ikirsector.it/forum/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=17576 Last edited by tlosm on 29-Sep-2013 at 09:53 PM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wawa
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 29-Sep-2013 21:40:51
| | [ #92 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tlosm
interesting, seems the 060 and g4 offer the best performance clock by clock in this comparison. well except for i7 ;) Last edited by wawa on 29-Sep-2013 at 09:41 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 29-Sep-2013 21:50:23
| | [ #93 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2744
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @wawa
there is a guy who have an a1200 with a 060 at 100mhz overclocked and a Vodoo the timedemo of gl quake was better compared with a 604 233 with Radeon 9200 256mb
... If motorola dont stop the CISC 68xxx cpu production probably today the history will be different
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 30-Sep-2013 0:20:50
| | [ #94 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1462
From: Italia | | |
|
| @tlosm
opengl benchmark in 640x480 don't show you power of your VGA becuase at that resolution is CPU and bus to make difference. To see in GLquake real power of GPU you have to bench at higher resoluton, so 1024x768 or 1280x1024. At this resolution you can see how it works your vga and his memory bandwitch.
so at 1024x768 and more higher resolution you can see real difference within radeon 9200 and radeon 9250 both 128bit.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 30-Sep-2013 0:21:35
| | [ #95 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1462
From: Italia | | |
|
| @tlosm
opengl benchmark in 640x480 don't show you power of your VGA becuase at that resolution is CPU and bus to make difference. To see in GLquake real power of GPU you have to bench at higher resoluton, so 1024x768 or 1280x1024. At this resolution you can see how it works your vga and his memory bandwitch.
so at 1024x768 and more higher resolution you can see real difference within radeon 9200 and radeon 9250 both 128bit.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 30-Sep-2013 9:40:31
| | [ #96 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2744
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| @Seiya
QuakeGl fps 1)1024x768 2)640x480
(Osx 10.5.8) Powerbook G4 1.67 Radeon 9700 128mb = 1) 185,7 2) 263,4
(AOs4) Pegasos 2 G4 1.0 Radeon 9000pro 128mb = 1) 75,5 2) 133,5 (320x240=180.3 :P)
(Morphos) MacMini G4 1.5 Radeon 9200 64mb = 1) 46.6 2) 74.8
(Osx 10.6.8) IMac (2x4t)I7 2.93 RadeonHd 5750 1GB = 1) 1215,7 2) 1460
(win7) 2xP4 3.0 RadeonHD 7750 2GB DDR3 = 1) 145,9 2) 160.3 fps Last edited by tlosm on 30-Sep-2013 at 12:39 PM. Last edited by tlosm on 30-Sep-2013 at 10:48 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 30-Sep-2013 at 09:56 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 30-Sep-2013 at 09:52 AM. Last edited by tlosm on 30-Sep-2013 at 09:42 AM.
_________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
 |  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 10-Oct-2013 21:11:57
| | [ #97 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3725
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @pavlor
Quote:
Edit: Superior memory performance of PA6T in comparison to G4 shows also MPlayer benchmark. Comparison to newer e600 based designs (8610/8640) would be interesting. |
When its possible I do volunteer for PA6T side.
Real life use experience is even better, thanks to fast SATA, memory transfers and RadeonHD. This kind of G4 superiority on single core vs single core, sounds nice, but when compared with slower RAM, AGP bus and IDE drives, it reminds of me of old trick of PCs that had just good CPU name and rest of components downgrading system speed.
Surely, these were the standards at time of PPC Macs, real modern ones, but in this comparison, anything related to real life has to take this in account._________________ Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
 |  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 10-Oct-2013 21:13:14
| | [ #98 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3725
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @tlosm
Quote:
QuakeGl fps 1)1024x768 2)640x480 |
Can you direct me to OS4/LinuxPPC version and some needed WAD file, as well as how to run it. Will submit results.
_________________ Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 10-Oct-2013 22:37:56
| | [ #99 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2744
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
 |  |
Re: RageMem benchmarks between OS4 machines Posted on 10-Oct-2013 23:43:23
| | [ #100 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3725
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @tlosm
Got it, ~ opens console, what to type? _________________ Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|