The Judge is refering to various documents with differences from both sides. The subcontractors Annex versus no Annex on the original Agreement and the two "Arctic" ones.
What he is saying is that it is unsafe to rule using these as evidence as both sides have diffrent versions.
He is treating clause 2.04 of AMiga Incs version of the Artic Agreement as having effect after clause 3.01 of the Original Agreement.
Which he is forced to because "there" Arctic version makes no sense.
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card