Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
|
|
|
|
Poster | Thread | jkirk
| |
Re: First round goes to Hyperion Posted on 20-Jun-2007 5:23:45
| | [ #1 ] |
| |
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Jan-2005 Posts: 3349
From: Georgia (usa) | | |
|
| @samface
Quote:
These "teachings" were not incorrect, right? |
let's see what teachings was that again? oh yes.
Quote:
Ok, let's teach an american about american welfare. |
so your answer is utterly, positively, incorrect teachings.
Quote:
I obviously knew more about what a welfare system is than he did judging by his assumption that I was talking about unemploymency benefits as soon as I mentioned welfare. |
and obviously you are attempting to move the goalposts so you look like the winner.
first you mention "income-salary insurance" i said that didn't exist
then you claim it is welfare and workers comp(simultaneously)and i addressed welfare, unemployment insurance and workers comp in one lot.
you then claim i don't know what welfare is (considering you don't know about us welfare either)
i then post links to the workers comp page that makes it obvious that workers comp is about on job injury wage compensation and an article that states workers comp is considered as last in the creditor list in the event of a bankruptcy.
you then claim(to another user) it is alright to talk bad about me because i don't know what i am talking about so i state that i was not wrong so it was not ok.
in response you claim i did not research anything and quoted the main page i had just linked to(which btw did not support your statement)
i then correct you on that as well since you were of the opinion that workers comp did cover bankruptcy.
you then responded Quote:
Of course it also covers bankruptcy, simply googling and checking out some cases will give you that answer. |
so i asked for your proof. you decided to ignore that since that proof does not exist.
so you follow up(directed at another user) not with proof but claims that i was assuming things and pretending to know the info. i corrected you on that as well.
then others tell you you are wrong as well so what do you do? move the goalposts and claim this whole sorry thing is my fault. well sam i thought you were better than theat but i guess i would have more luck talking to my cousin (he is mentally challenged btw gotta be politically correct)
bottom line you don't know what the US system is or how it works so don't attempt to tell us you know it better.
i apologize to everyone else for the length of this post just to refute accusations. i hope to end this sub-topic here.
Last edited by jkirk on 20-Jun-2007 at 12:57 PM. Last edited by jkirk on 20-Jun-2007 at 05:25 AM.
_________________ Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition. |
| Status: Offline |
| |
|
|
|
[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ]
[ forums ][ classifieds ]
[ links ][ news archive ]
[ link to us ][ user account ]
|