Quote:

fairlanefastback wrote: Well they are arguing they did not know at the time to the court. So for the moment sticking to the presented theory I agree with your point that "if they believed at a later time that" Amiga Delaware did not have successor rights, "they should have sent back the money". Yep they should have. Again, where is Amiga's legal team on this point? Of course we don't know if Hyperion did not try to at some point and/or what negotiation attempts were made to try to avoid a lawsuit at different moments in time. So again, if Amiga can stand well on this point, their lawyers only need present it. and if its so, I hope they do!

Actually the AI lawyers did present that, Page 11 starting at line 9. Also given the response from the lawyer to Ben before the lawsuit, Ben and company are asking for money for the buyout still then. Its absolutely silly for them to be asking for money for the buyout in October of 2006, and now say, well the time for the buyout ended in June of 2005, which is there current arguement.
-Tig

_________________
We played the first thing that came to our heads, it just happened to be the best song in the world.