I really can't see why you think this was "a big mistake".
You seem to be forgetting/ignoring that it still has to be ascertained if the selling of IP from AInc (W) to ITec was legal at all.
There is nothing illegal about selling the IP used to clear a debt to a first secured creditor (ie the AI(W) - Itec deal), especially when it doesnt lead to a dissolved company, the contract that has always had an issue with it is the AI(W) - KMOS deal, because at the end of that all of the value had been removed from the company and none of the debts paid thats usually not allowed, but it has no impact on this case. ...
IMO the important question is: "Did AI(W) at all have the right to sell anything regarding OS 3.1 - OS 3.9?"
_________________ Ciao
Dandy __________________________________________ If someone enjoys marching to military music, then I already despise him. He got his brain accidently - the bone marrow in his back would have been sufficient for him! (Albert Einstein)