|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 18-Jul-2005 Posts: 1731
From: Lake Shastina, Northern Calif. | | |
|
| @number6
Quote:
Hmmm, I find that document a bit disturbing, as it seems that the Amiga Parties (Cloanto/CA Acquisition) are worried about Ben Hermans reply, like the court can't see for itself the flaws of his illogical interpretation of some parts of the case. I hope I'm wrong, and they are just responding in this way as a matter of usual court practices, and nothing is going wrong with the case. Although I'm sure Ben has "weaseled" his way out of lots of bad behavior in the past, and is used to twisting the law in immoral ways, the evidence I've seen so far in this case seems so clearly against Hyperion, I can't imagine how any judge or jury could not see it the same way.
What's your take on this latest document submitted by the Amiga Parties, and what way do you think the case is leaning, in favor, or against Hyperion winning? If you don't want to share your opinion, that's okay. I don't blame anyone for not wanting to express their opinions on this ridiculous situation, I just wish it would finally go to trial and get settled, because I'm pretty sure that any jury or judge would see Hyperion as the party that has broken the 2009 agreement, and hopefully through it out and strip them of everything they stole when it was signed._________________ Amiga! The computer that inspired so many, to accomplish so much, but has ended up in the hands of . . . . . . . . . . |
|