Some people in this community do not accept reality. It is their problem.
I fully agree on this. Quote:
Reality do not change because for example cdimauro do not accept it.
I fully disagree on this, because all that I've reported is fully-compliant with the reality.
But are free to quote me and show me (with FACTs: not your non-sense) where it's no the case, if you think differently. Quote:
It is simple. Amiga was made big endian.
Yes, and so? Quote:
And after switch to litte endian it will be no longer at the same time source and binary compatible.
It would miss only binary compatibility.
Source compatibility is kept as long as sources are correctly written by coders. Again, AROS is a clear proof here. And, again, you have no clue of what you're talking about. Quote:
Amiga is not retro. It is not important how much computers where sold after Commodore.
It's the exact opposite when we're talking of retro-platforms: it matters.
Any number? New models? Please, list them. Quote:
It is important how Amiga was made.
It WAS important how Amiga WAS made. It was important AT THAT TIME.
Certainly NOT now, because computing took different paths.
Finally and quoting Rose: "still eagerly waiting your big brain answer to #1290.".
@OlafS25 Quote:
OlafS25 wrote: @ppcamiga1
How do you explain how Apple could switch from 68k to PPC and then X86?
And now ARM.
That's because the o.s. had a better design, which didn't exposed internals or allowed for too low-level stuff / control to the user. Properly abstracted APIs & o.s. structures are the key things here.
At least for desktop/server/et similar markets.
For embedded markets it's the opposite: it's an advantage. As clearly proved by many projects which used the Amiga o.s..
22 crawler(s) on-line.
111 guest(s) on-line.
1 member(s) on-line.
DiscreetFX 
