Poster | Thread |
Foody
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 17:23:00
| | [ #141 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 3-Sep-2003 Posts: 1467
From: Canada | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Mr_Capehill
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 17:40:23
| | [ #142 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 15-Mar-2003 Posts: 1932
From: Yharnam | | |
|
| @Crumb
Sorry but you are wrong. I thought you knew it?-) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 19:41:38
| | [ #143 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2341
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @Samwell & Chip & peoples that thinks same they...
If you dont like/need it simply dont use it! But... If a program like sputnik will work on MOSemu why dont use????? You are sadic and you want to suffer still using (REALLY) BAD Amiga browsers? I dont think that... If it would run a program like ShowGirls why not to use it? Ther's NO programs like it on OS4 unfortunately(as just said)... But if Itix would/will port it...why not? Same thing was true for other possible programs... And same thing was true in the reverse way, so OS4 programs that a MOS user will like can be launched via OS4emu... I dont see nothing wrong in that... ShapeShifter/Fusion users was mad? MOL users was mad? other emulators/wrappers users was mad?
I dunno... really...
Tuxedo. Last edited by Tuxedo on 28-Sep-2006 at 07:42 PM.
_________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
DoodooHead
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 19:45:25
| | [ #144 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 641
From: Reno, Nevada, U.S. | | |
|
| Why not just do what I do?
Buy the computer that runs the software that you want to run.
_________________ Amiga user since 1985. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pixie
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 22:17:34
| | [ #145 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 3115
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
DoodooHead
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 22:35:14
| | [ #146 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 641
From: Reno, Nevada, U.S. | | |
|
| @pixie
Quote:
Because we don't have all to be a DoodooHead... |
That is correct. You can buy an XBOX and try to play Playstation games on it. Then you can write a letter to Bill Gates and demand that he make a Playstation Emulator for the XBOX. All becuase you really wanted to play Playstaion games and bought the wrong machine.
_________________ Amiga user since 1985. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 22:44:02
| | [ #147 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @falemagn
Quote:
You could make exec.library return a different base for MOS programs than for AOS4 programs, a base which you'd be free to patch at your will, of course.
|
OS4 doesnt support this because remapping is global (it is single address base after all). And wouldnt guarantee 100% reliability, still.
_________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pixie
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 22:51:04
| | [ #148 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 3115
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal | | |
|
| @DoodooHead
So I cannot buy a PC and use my WinUAE(Yes, instaad of my old Amiga1200)? Run! Go telling all your A1 friends to stop using emulators on their beloved A1, on the way tell them not to use their legal and purchased MacOS on MOL while you're at it, but do it fast before it ruins your credibility _________________ Indigo 3D Lounge, my second home. The Illusion of Choice | Am*ga |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chain-Q
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 23:10:59
| | [ #149 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 31-Jan-2005 Posts: 824
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| @Chip Quote:
Now I see ChainQ's point!!! Thanks! |
You are hopeless... You know damn well, that: 1., MorphOS calling scheme was invented years ago before OS4 started working. 2., OS4 was designed in such a way to make the job itix talks about difficult. (Probably not intentionally, but simply without caring about what other people did before, and why they did that.)
You quote my words, then itix's words, then you put them in an environment to suggest people to draw the wrong conclusion, and then you're happy about it, being a cool guy, with sunglasses... *sigh*...
_________________ MorphOS, classic Amiga, demoscene, and stuff "When a bridge is not enough, build a Viaduct!" "Strip the Amiga community of speculation and we can fit every forum on a 720k floppy" (by resle) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
DoodooHead
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 28-Sep-2006 23:13:41
| | [ #150 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 641
From: Reno, Nevada, U.S. | | |
|
| @pixie
I don't care what you do. I don't care what other A1 owners do. If I wanted to run any MorphOS applications I would go get a machine to run them on. That's all I'm saying. It has nothing to do with anybody else. (I run my MacOS software on a Mac.) _________________ Amiga user since 1985. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
_ThEcRoW
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 1:26:26
| | [ #151 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 12-Jan-2005 Posts: 834
From: Murcia (Spain) | | |
|
| @DoodooHead
"Why not just do what I do? Buy the computer that runs the software that you want to run."
Where are those computers to buy?. Are there new A1's? So you don't have valid points and use the old saying: buy the hardware, but, WHAT HARDWARE? _________________ Amiga 1200 desktop. Apollo 030/50 Mhz 8mb ram + ClassicWB + Wb 3.1 Amiga 500 + ACA500plus 8mb + 30gb CF Raspberry Pi 3b+ and Amibian 1.4 Mac Mini G4 1GB Ram with the butterfly!! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
gary_c
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 2:15:12
| | [ #152 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 1-Mar-2004 Posts: 874
From: Chiba, Japan | | |
|
| @DoodooHead I have to wonder if you're sort of new to Amiga computing. Back in the day, it was a point of pride that we could use Amax or Shapeshifter or PCTask so that we not only could run Amiga software on our computer, but MacOS or PC software as well. People thought it showed that the Amiga was "better" because of this kind of expanded, flexible use. I still think that makes sense. I have no idea why you think "buy more hardware to run the software" is a good thing when a low-cost/no-cost software solution can be used instead.
-- gary_c
_________________ zukakakina.com - themes.tikiwiki.org |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
DoodooHead
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 2:21:07
| | [ #153 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 641
From: Reno, Nevada, U.S. | | |
|
| @_ThEcRoW
The topic of this thread is about running MorphOS software on OS4. I say go get a machine to run MorphOS.
As far as where is the hardware for running OS4... I said about a month ago that I was going to save up my money because there was hardware coming. I said there were at least 6 motherboards in development to run OS4 on.
Samantha Moana Bridgette Amy05 Panda PowerVixen TL ...
I was called a drug user for suggesting such a thing. Check in at here periodically and I'm sure you'll see the announcements when they are ready. _________________ Amiga user since 1985. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
DoodooHead
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 2:27:04
| | [ #154 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 641
From: Reno, Nevada, U.S. | | |
|
| @gary_c
Quote:
I have no idea why you think "buy more hardware to run the software" is a good thing when a low-cost/no-cost software solution can be used instead. |
Just trying to drum up a few sales for my old pal Bill Buck. _________________ Amiga user since 1985. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
gary_c
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 4:56:47
| | [ #155 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 1-Mar-2004 Posts: 874
From: Chiba, Japan | | |
|
| @DoodooHead
Quote:
I have no idea why you think "buy more hardware to run the software" is a good thing when a low-cost/no-cost software solution can be used instead. Quote:
Just trying to drum up a few sales for my old pal Bill Buck. |
|
I guess a lame joke is as good a response as any when there are no logical arguments left.
-- gary_c_________________ zukakakina.com - themes.tikiwiki.org |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
falemagn
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 5:42:51
| | [ #156 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 24-Nov-2003 Posts: 1126
From: Italy | | |
|
| @itix
Shame on me, I had forgotten you take SysBase from an absolute address (in AROS wil let the loader "fill the blanks", so to speak, or pass SysBase as an argument to the entry point).
However, aren't those function vectors typically unused by 68k apps? If so, something is excaping me: why would there be a conflict if MOSEmu patched those vectors or if the function table were extended to account for those vectors? _________________ “It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” ~~ Henry Ford |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 6:39:53
| | [ #157 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @falemagn
Quote:
Shame on me, I had forgotten you take SysBase from an absolute address (in AROS wil let the loader "fill the blanks", so to speak, or pass SysBase as an argument to the entry point).
|
Yep
Quote:
However, aren't those function vectors typically unused by 68k apps? If so, something is excaping me: why would there be a conflict if MOSEmu patched those vectors or if the function table were extended to account for those vectors?
|
Lets see... Offset for NewRawDoFmt() is at -920 and at least 3.5 doesnt have functions that far. Extending a function table would be enough. There is only one SysV function inside 3.5 jump table and seems it is an empty slot on 3.5.
On the other hand MOSEmu could just overwrite 3.5/3.9 extensions... not big loss?
_________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chip
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 7:56:40
| | [ #158 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2005 Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| @Chain-Q
Quote:
I asked you already to stop personal insulting.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chip
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 8:12:14
| | [ #159 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2005 Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chip
| |
Re: I think we need MOS emu...And I will explain you why... Posted on 29-Sep-2006 8:14:27
| | [ #160 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2005 Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| @itix
What about patching the MOS binary during load?
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|