Poster | Thread |
stew
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 4:26:49
| | [ #81 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 26-Sep-2003 Posts: 453
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @thread
How many times has someone complained about wanting somethig, hardware as well as software, and been told if you don't like it do something about it yourself. Here is someone offering to do it for you. If it is too much do it yourself. Doesn't seem like such a large amount anymore. The only thing I dislike about the whole thing is if you contribute to this bounty and it doesn't come about you have been forced into contributing to a bounty that you were not interested in in the first place. Money should be returned.
Stew
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
jahc
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 5:06:17
| | [ #82 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 30-May-2003 Posts: 2959
From: Auckland, New Zealand | | |
|
| @stew
The price is high, but it will be worth it if we all chip in. We're going to help enable Amigas future. If the next OS4 machines can browse the web nice, it'll be a big selling point!
I intend to make multiple donations when finances allow! I'm glad the heavy hitters are plonking big amounts in, to help make up for the low number of donators so far. :)
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fairlanefastback
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 6:28:55
| | [ #83 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| @jahc
Quote:
Considering what the community gets, the time involved to do this, and the low level of enthusiasm for the AOS 4.0 platform the programmer has I disagree.
Quote:
If the next OS4 machines can browse the web nice, it'll be a big selling point! |
"Next OS4 machines". That would be cool. Short of hobbyists it would not be a selling point, it would be an assumed requirement I think. Of course either way it will be good to have. And the more useful apps the community pays for, the more likely the possibility that Amiga Inc. will notice the free R&D they are getting and want to start granting licenses._________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
jahc
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 7:15:06
| | [ #84 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 30-May-2003 Posts: 2959
From: Auckland, New Zealand | | |
|
| @fairlanefastback
Quote:
Considering what the community gets, the time involved to do this, and the low level of enthusiasm for the AOS 4.0 platform the programmer has I disagree. |
The time involved? How long do you think its going to take?
Quote:
"Next OS4 machines". That would be cool. Short of hobbyists it would not be a selling point, it would be an assumed requirement I think. Of course either way it will be good to have. |
Thats what I meant. You cant sell a machine that cant do the web nicely.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
hatty
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 10:00:58
| | [ #85 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 5-May-2006 Posts: 60
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Marcik is NOT going to do an OS4 port of Sputnik, so forget it. Sputnik will be an official component of MOS 1.5 once released. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Insanity
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 10:07:57
| | [ #86 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Aug-2005 Posts: 405
From: Sweden | | |
|
| @hatty
I was under the impression that Sputnik was a freeware closed source program, which Marcik himself had control over (the port from linux anyway), so that statement makes no sense (unless I am misinformed) Last edited by Insanity on 17-Feb-2007 at 10:10 AM.
_________________ Yes I own an Amiga. A non-upgraded A500 that is unpacked once every 3 years.
If you are going to quote me, do so fully or not at all. /Ins |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Akiko
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 10:18:17
| | [ #87 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 26-Mar-2004 Posts: 781
From: UK | | |
|
| @hatty
Nice bit of FUD!! Care to substantiate those claims?
_________________ 4000T/BFG9060 CD32/Elsat ProModule, TF360 CD32/ Edu's CD32 <> A1200 Adapter, Vampire V2 CD32/ FMV Module |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
hatty
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 10:21:49
| | [ #88 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 5-May-2006 Posts: 60
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Akiko
you should not base a bounty on "impressions" and assumptions. ask him yourself |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Troels
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 11:01:21
| | [ #89 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2005
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @hatty
Who cares if Sputnik is going to be included with MorphOS 1.5 (apart from the MOS users)?
I doubt you have any saying as to what platforms Marcin will support, so please stop your FUD or show me some evidence that he won't do the port. I would like that evidence to be newer than the 15+ emails I have from Marcin where we discussed the OS4 port.
@Jahc
Multiple donations, what a nice idea Pay day is not that far away, I might donate some more myself then. _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
BrandonLee
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 13:13:55
| | [ #90 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 15-Dec-2003 Posts: 1355
From: Lisbon, Portugal | | |
|
| @d0c
yes its fair... pay and give the man what he wants!... getting things free like from aminet back in the old days are over. if we want to keep amiga alive its pay or die... its as simple as that...
And by that you mean we should throw our money blindly, otherwise the Amiga dies? Sorry, but I don't agree. I reserve myself the right to chose what projects I want to support. I'm a registered Pagestream and Imagine3D user, for example. I also paid for the excellent DVPlayer. This "Sputnik" thing has been widely talked about. Seems the intention to port is not very big. And saying that if the fee is not reached, money will be piped to "other projects" just doesn't do it for me.
The Amiga needs support, but not blind support.
By the way, I hope "Sputnik" gets indeed ported. Any additional software is good for the platform. I just don't like the conditions imposed(even though I respect them and wholly agree that Marcik has the obvious right to impose them).
Last edited by BrandonLee on 17-Feb-2007 at 01:24 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Troels
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 14:08:17
| | [ #91 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2005
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @BrandonLee
No one should pay blindly for anything (although it would make things a lot easier).
If you would like to see Sputnik for OS4 you should consider donating but not more than what you can afford to loose as there's no guarantee we will reach the needed amount.
The reason I don't do a return of the money (my decision not Marcin's) is that I want this bounty to do something good for the community whether we get Sputnik ported or not. The only guarantee I can give you as an OS4 user is that they will benefit development of OS4 applications and that I will listen to all suggestions about who to donate to.
But I hope this is not relevant and think we will reach the target in time.
Btw If you don't donate now (really hope you will change your mind) I hope you do it later if you chose to use Sputnik.
Best rgrds Troels _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmiKit
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 14:19:27
| | [ #92 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 18-Jul-2004 Posts: 1136
From: Europe | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
BrandonLee
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 15:52:21
| | [ #93 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 15-Dec-2003 Posts: 1355
From: Lisbon, Portugal | | |
|
| @AmiKit and Troels
Let me make it clear that I too admire Troels activities in helping the Amiga community. I just don't (totally) agree with this particular bounty.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
RWO
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 16:27:30
| | [ #94 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 457
From: Denmark | | |
|
| @BrandonLee
What bounty do you want to see and suport?
For this dont have to be the last bounty.
RWO _________________ Debugging is a state of mind |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fairlanefastback
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 16:53:04
| | [ #95 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| @jahc
Quote:
The time involved? How long do you think its going to take? |
I don't think paying the man $150 USD an hour and assuming 26 hours of work is unreasonable.
Hobbies cost money. Advancement of what you can do with your hobby costs money. _________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
kindergip
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 17:26:55
| | [ #96 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Aug-2004 Posts: 312
From: Canada | | |
|
| @ll
I've used AWeb almost exclusively. I love the speed and stability. I purchased IBrowse when it came out to have the extra capability it offered. Then it came included with OS4 Final, albeit in slightly reduced form.
It's not really about the money for me, it's about having a fast responsive machine that makes the most of its resources and having applications that engender that.
Sputnik meets the bill.
I'm glad that Marcin has such a thick skin. Really, I'm embarrassed by the bickering. My 10 Euro's is in the pot, no conditions attached. I'll probably double and triple that amount in the future.
You all have the offer. Take it or leave it. As the policeman said, " Nothing happening here, move on". It's not really up for debate.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Zardoz
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 17:35:06
| | [ #97 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 13-Mar-2003 Posts: 4261
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @kindergip
Quote:
I'm glad that Marcin has such a thick skin. Really, I'm embarrassed by the bickering. |
Amazingly thick if you ask me, certain Polish users have gone totally apeshit over this and attack him all the time._________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
lionstorm
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 17:53:23
| | [ #98 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 1588
From: the french side | | |
|
| @Akiko
why would winuae users donate for a browser when they have iexplorer close to the mouse |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Akiko
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 19:15:02
| | [ #99 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 26-Mar-2004 Posts: 781
From: UK | | |
|
| @lionstorm
So winuae users don't have to do precisely that! _________________ 4000T/BFG9060 CD32/Elsat ProModule, TF360 CD32/ Edu's CD32 <> A1200 Adapter, Vampire V2 CD32/ FMV Module |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Anonymous
| |
Re: Unfair bounty? Posted on 17-Feb-2007 19:16:05
| | [ # ] |
|
| @lionstorm
Anyone still using IE should be shot. There's simply no excuse for using that piece of filth that degrades the web for everyone (including themselves). |
|
|
|
|