Poster | Thread |
pixie
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 11:12:16
| | [ #41 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 3120
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal | | |
|
| @jahc It's been hinted that because X11 is native makes Firefox also native, as such it would be reason enough for having the bounty.
Well, for me it wouldn't, not only because it is not Amiga native in the sense Amiga programs are but also because it would only be available for OS4, all very far away from bounty conditions, unless you change them that is... _________________ Indigo 3D Lounge, my second home. The Illusion of Choice | Am*ga |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
afxgroup
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 11:21:20
| | [ #42 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2004 Posts: 1968
From: Taranto, Italy | | |
|
| @All
first of all.. yes the program is compiled and it can be executed but it fail in a class and i'm investigate what is wrong.. second.. i haven't ask nothing regards bounty and however behind this program there are a lot of people that should receive a "slice" of bounty. Edgar for the X11 port and libs, Friedens Bros for nspr and maybe.. me for the rest.. But i want only port firefox because WE NEED a browser.. nothing else.. _________________ http://www.amigasoft.net |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Drathro
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 11:38:19
| | [ #43 ] |
|
|
|
Member |
Joined: 20-May-2007 Posts: 38
From: Newcastle, England | | |
|
| is the bounty page still being maintained?
it looks pretty old.
Last edited by Drathro on 13-Jul-2007 at 04:35 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
virgolamobile
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:16:42
| | [ #44 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 23-Feb-2004 Posts: 192
From: Somewhere in Northern Italy | | |
|
| @afxgroup
I like this way of thinking! Keep it up and if a working browser will come out of it I will give my appreciation ($!).
If we still want having fun with this platform we don't have to wait marketing/political people! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
stevieu
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:22:15
| | [ #45 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 23-Apr-2003 Posts: 647
From: England, UK | | |
|
| @pixie
I also agree with what you say. As DiscreetFX said, it would obviously be nice to make it an Amiga 'specific' port - AREXX port etc...
That's my way of thinking, anyway.
Steve
_________________ A1200T - OS4.0,OS3.9: 603e PPC 200mhz,060 50mhz, 256mb ram, FastATA MK-III, BVision, 160gb,20gb HDDs
A1200 - OS3.1: Blizzard IV 030, 64mb ram, 400mb HDD
OS4.x - Flying the AMIGA flag |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
stevieu
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:24:22
| | [ #46 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 23-Apr-2003 Posts: 647
From: England, UK | | |
|
| @afxgroup
Keep up the great work. It's thanks to people like you, that we are saved from sinking. Cheers!
Steve _________________ A1200T - OS4.0,OS3.9: 603e PPC 200mhz,060 50mhz, 256mb ram, FastATA MK-III, BVision, 160gb,20gb HDDs
A1200 - OS3.1: Blizzard IV 030, 64mb ram, 400mb HDD
OS4.x - Flying the AMIGA flag |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
amipal
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:25:00
| | [ #47 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 8-Apr-2003 Posts: 1907
From: Saltdean, East Sussex, UK | | |
|
| @stevieu
Adding Amiga-specific features (suc as AREXX or proper menus) would be great, but this is an initial step to getting the program working on the OS4 platform. The package can evolve from there once we actually have the thing running! _________________ After a decade away from the scene, I am back! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
stevieu
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:50:54
| | [ #48 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 23-Apr-2003 Posts: 647
From: England, UK | | |
|
| @amipal
Yes, I know that (hence the message of thanks underneath my previous comment).
I was just adding to what pixie said, regarding the bounty and finally having a 'proper' Amiga port.
Steve _________________ A1200T - OS4.0,OS3.9: 603e PPC 200mhz,060 50mhz, 256mb ram, FastATA MK-III, BVision, 160gb,20gb HDDs
A1200 - OS3.1: Blizzard IV 030, 64mb ram, 400mb HDD
OS4.x - Flying the AMIGA flag |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Yssing
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 13:38:03
| | [ #49 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 24-Apr-2003 Posts: 1084
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Great... keep up the good work...
I hope I can be able to try it out sometime in the future... All depends on new HW and SW..
In the meantime... Best of luck to you..
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Legion
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 14:27:10
| | [ #50 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 21-Apr-2003 Posts: 820
From: Fargo, ND, USA | | |
|
| @afxgroup
Quote:
But i want only port firefox because WE NEED a browser |
Finally someone is starting to get it. I appreciate your efforts!!_________________ ...wait... what? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chip
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 14:38:57
| | [ #51 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2005 Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| @pixie
Nobody stops you or anybody else to create your own X11 implementation for your beloved platform.
@all
Andrea did a huge step ahead, but it's very far away from the end. Speaking about the bounty now is too early. I'd suggest to calm down and if you want to support Andrea, you can still donate some money to him.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hans
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 15:52:45
| | [ #52 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 27-Dec-2003 Posts: 5067
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @afxgroup
Talking about Edgar Schwan's Cygnix (X11) package, is he working on optimising it at all? It works, but it is sluggish compared to the Amiga GUI system. I realize that X11 is a big system with significant overhead, but I'm sure that it could be made to run faster.
Hans
_________________ http://hdrlab.org.nz/ - Amiga OS 4 projects, programming articles and more. Home of the RadeonHD driver for Amiga OS 4.x project. https://keasigmadelta.com/ - More of my work. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chip
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 16:05:51
| | [ #53 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 4-Mar-2005 Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| @Hans
As far as I know, he is working on it and there are plans how to make it even faster. If I'm correct on Amigans.net you can find a discussion about this.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ssolie
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 16:19:14
| | [ #54 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 2755
From: Alberta, Canada | | |
|
| @Hans Quote:
Talking about Edgar Schwan's Cygnix (X11) package, is he working on optimising it at all? |
Yes and I betcha he would work harder on it if you donated some cash for what he has produced so far. I know I have. Last edited by ssolie on 13-Jul-2007 at 04:19 PM.
_________________ ExecSG Team Lead |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
umisef
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 16:36:47
| | [ #55 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Jun-2005 Posts: 1714
From: Melbourne, Australia | | |
|
| @itix
Quote:
Ahem. Static variables are not problem in library code |
Uhm, given that static variables are just the same as globals, only with limited scope, I fail to see how that would work.
If process A stores value 1 in static variable X, then process B stores value 2, then process A reads X and gets... 2; However, process A should have gotten 1.
Yes, one *could* allocate a dedicated memory area for globals/statics on each OpenLibrary; If one were to make a copy of the library structure at the same time (or at least of the user-level accessible parts), one could then access the dedicated, per-process version through the library pointer. But AFAIK, that's not how things work in AmigaOS.
So, how does one make
int it_has_been_a_long_time(time_t now) { static time_t last=0; int answer;
answer=(now-last>3600); last=now; return answer; }
safe to be called from multiple processes, without the value of "last" getting confused between them?
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
CygnusEd
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 17:33:39
| | [ #56 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Feb-2004 Posts: 393
From: germany | | |
|
| @Hans
I think, I should write some words about my new Cygnix here:
I'm recompiling the whole project to achieve these targets: * Better performance. As a first step I use now newlib instead of clib2. It's faster now, but still not fast enough. Now the server must be optimized. * Reduce conflicts with other unix ports and with the OS4-SDK. * Use a common way to compile/configure all parts of cygnix.
Andrea's firefox binary is already using these new libs. _________________ X-5000 PPC 5020/2 GHZ, Fractal Define XL R2-Tower, OS 4.1 final update 2, 4 GB, Radeon HD 7770, ESI Juli@ XTe SAM 460ex/1,15 GHZ, OS 4.1 final, 2 GB, Radeon HD 6450 Amiga 4000D/040 25 Mhz, OS 3.9 BB2, 272 MB, X-Surf, 250 MB ZIP |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Lou
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 18:35:40
| | [ #57 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 2-Nov-2004 Posts: 4169
From: Rhode Island | | |
|
| @Chip
Quote:
Chip wrote: @pixie
Nobody stops you or anybody else to create your own X11 implementation for your beloved platform.
@all
Andrea did a huge step ahead, but it's very far away from the end. Speaking about the bounty now is too early. I'd suggest to calm down and if you want to support Andrea, you can still donate some money to him.
|
Him? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hans
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 18:38:47
| | [ #58 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 27-Dec-2003 Posts: 5067
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @CygnusEd
Thanks for the update. Good to hear that performance has already improved.
Hans
_________________ http://hdrlab.org.nz/ - Amiga OS 4 projects, programming articles and more. Home of the RadeonHD driver for Amiga OS 4.x project. https://keasigmadelta.com/ - More of my work. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 18:38:52
| | [ #59 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @Lou
Quote:
Yes._________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hans
| |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Jul-2007 18:46:56
| | [ #60 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 27-Dec-2003 Posts: 5067
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @umisef
Quote:
umisef wrote: @itix
Quote:
Ahem. Static variables are not problem in library code |
Uhm, given that static variables are just the same as globals, only with limited scope, I fail to see how that would work.
If process A stores value 1 in static variable X, then process B stores value 2, then process A reads X and gets... 2; However, process A should have gotten 1.
Yes, one *could* allocate a dedicated memory area for globals/statics on each OpenLibrary; If one were to make a copy of the library structure at the same time (or at least of the user-level accessible parts), one could then access the dedicated, per-process version through the library pointer. But AFAIK, that's not how things work in AmigaOS.
So, how does one make
int it_has_been_a_long_time(time_t now) { static time_t last=0; int answer;
answer=(now-last>3600); last=now; return answer; }
safe to be called from multiple processes, without the value of "last" getting confused between them?
|
You're not supposed to use static local variables in shared code, unless it's meant to be shared across all processes. You might actually want to have global variables that are not different for each process as they track things common to all (possibly in something like a networking library).
Amiga OS4's library interfaces system allows interfaces to have their own private local variables for each process that obtains an interface.
Hans_________________ http://hdrlab.org.nz/ - Amiga OS 4 projects, programming articles and more. Home of the RadeonHD driver for Amiga OS 4.x project. https://keasigmadelta.com/ - More of my work. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|