Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
26 crawler(s) on-line.
 124 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 amigakit:  8 mins ago
 kolla:  15 mins ago
 Tuxedo:  15 mins ago
 zipper:  20 mins ago
 OlafS25:  23 mins ago
 OneTimer1:  25 mins ago
 Rob:  38 mins ago
 matthey:  44 mins ago
 RobertB:  2 hrs 2 mins ago
 pavlor:  2 hrs 34 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga OS4 Software
      /  Firefox on X11
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next Page )
PosterThread
pixie 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 11:12:16
#41 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Mar-2003
Posts: 3120
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal

@jahc
It's been hinted that because X11 is native makes Firefox also native, as such it would be reason enough for having the bounty.

Well, for me it wouldn't, not only because it is not Amiga native in the sense Amiga programs are but also because it would only be available for OS4, all very far away from bounty conditions, unless you change them that is...

_________________
Indigo 3D Lounge, my second home.
The Illusion of Choice | Am*ga

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
afxgroup 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 11:21:20
#42 ]
Super Member
Joined: 8-Mar-2004
Posts: 1968
From: Taranto, Italy

@All

first of all.. yes the program is compiled and it can be executed but it fail in a class and i'm investigate what is wrong..
second.. i haven't ask nothing regards bounty and however behind this program there are a lot of people that should receive a "slice" of bounty. Edgar for the X11 port and libs, Friedens Bros for nspr and maybe.. me for the rest..
But i want only port firefox because WE NEED a browser.. nothing else..

_________________
http://www.amigasoft.net

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Drathro 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 11:38:19
#43 ]
Member
Joined: 20-May-2007
Posts: 38
From: Newcastle, England

is the bounty page still being maintained?

it looks pretty old.

Last edited by Drathro on 13-Jul-2007 at 04:35 PM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
virgolamobile 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:16:42
#44 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 23-Feb-2004
Posts: 192
From: Somewhere in Northern Italy

@afxgroup

I like this way of thinking!
Keep it up and if a working browser will come out of it I will give my appreciation ($!).

If we still want having fun with this platform we don't have to wait marketing/political people!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
stevieu 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:22:15
#45 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 23-Apr-2003
Posts: 647
From: England, UK

@pixie

I also agree with what you say. As DiscreetFX said, it would obviously be nice to make it an Amiga 'specific' port - AREXX port etc...

That's my way of thinking, anyway.

Steve

_________________
A1200T - OS4.0,OS3.9: 603e PPC 200mhz,060 50mhz, 256mb ram, FastATA MK-III, BVision, 160gb,20gb HDDs

A1200 - OS3.1: Blizzard IV 030, 64mb ram, 400mb HDD

OS4.x - Flying the AMIGA flag

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
stevieu 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:24:22
#46 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 23-Apr-2003
Posts: 647
From: England, UK

@afxgroup

Keep up the great work. It's thanks to people like you, that we are saved from sinking.
Cheers!

Steve

_________________
A1200T - OS4.0,OS3.9: 603e PPC 200mhz,060 50mhz, 256mb ram, FastATA MK-III, BVision, 160gb,20gb HDDs

A1200 - OS3.1: Blizzard IV 030, 64mb ram, 400mb HDD

OS4.x - Flying the AMIGA flag

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
amipal 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:25:00
#47 ]
Super Member
Joined: 8-Apr-2003
Posts: 1907
From: Saltdean, East Sussex, UK

@stevieu

Adding Amiga-specific features (suc as AREXX or proper menus) would be great, but this is an initial step to getting the program working on the OS4 platform. The package can evolve from there once we actually have the thing running!

_________________
After a decade away from the scene, I am back!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
stevieu 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 12:50:54
#48 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 23-Apr-2003
Posts: 647
From: England, UK

@amipal

Yes, I know that (hence the message of thanks underneath my previous comment).

I was just adding to what pixie said, regarding the bounty and finally having a 'proper' Amiga port.

Steve

_________________
A1200T - OS4.0,OS3.9: 603e PPC 200mhz,060 50mhz, 256mb ram, FastATA MK-III, BVision, 160gb,20gb HDDs

A1200 - OS3.1: Blizzard IV 030, 64mb ram, 400mb HDD

OS4.x - Flying the AMIGA flag

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Yssing 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 13:38:03
#49 ]
Super Member
Joined: 24-Apr-2003
Posts: 1084
From: Unknown

Great... keep up the good work...

I hope I can be able to try it out sometime in the future... All depends on new HW and SW..

In the meantime... Best of luck to you..

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Legion 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 14:27:10
#50 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 21-Apr-2003
Posts: 820
From: Fargo, ND, USA

@afxgroup

Quote:
But i want only port firefox because WE NEED a browser


Finally someone is starting to get it. I appreciate your efforts!!

_________________
...wait... what?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Chip 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 14:38:57
#51 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 4-Mar-2005
Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary

@pixie

Nobody stops you or anybody else to create your own X11 implementation for your beloved platform.

@all

Andrea did a huge step ahead, but it's very far away from the end. Speaking about the bounty now is too early. I'd suggest to calm down and if you want to support Andrea, you can still donate some money to him.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Hans 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 15:52:45
#52 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 27-Dec-2003
Posts: 5067
From: New Zealand

@afxgroup

Talking about Edgar Schwan's Cygnix (X11) package, is he working on optimising it at all? It works, but it is sluggish compared to the Amiga GUI system. I realize that X11 is a big system with significant overhead, but I'm sure that it could be made to run faster.

Hans

_________________
http://hdrlab.org.nz/ - Amiga OS 4 projects, programming articles and more. Home of the RadeonHD driver for Amiga OS 4.x project.
https://keasigmadelta.com/ - More of my work.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Chip 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 16:05:51
#53 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 4-Mar-2005
Posts: 574
From: Budapest, Hungary

@Hans

As far as I know, he is working on it and there are plans how to make it even faster. If I'm correct on Amigans.net you can find a discussion about this.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
ssolie 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 16:19:14
#54 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Mar-2003
Posts: 2755
From: Alberta, Canada

@Hans
Quote:
Talking about Edgar Schwan's Cygnix (X11) package, is he working on optimising it at all?

Yes and I betcha he would work harder on it if you donated some cash for what he has produced so far. I know I have.

Last edited by ssolie on 13-Jul-2007 at 04:19 PM.

_________________
ExecSG Team Lead

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
umisef 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 16:36:47
#55 ]
Super Member
Joined: 19-Jun-2005
Posts: 1714
From: Melbourne, Australia

@itix

Quote:
Ahem. Static variables are not problem in library code


Uhm, given that static variables are just the same as globals, only with limited scope, I fail to see how that would work.

If process A stores value 1 in static variable X, then process B stores value 2, then process A reads X and gets... 2; However, process A should have gotten 1.

Yes, one *could* allocate a dedicated memory area for globals/statics on each OpenLibrary; If one were to make a copy of the library structure at the same time (or at least of the user-level accessible parts), one could then access the dedicated, per-process version through the library pointer. But AFAIK, that's not how things work in AmigaOS.

So, how does one make


int it_has_been_a_long_time(time_t now)
{
static time_t last=0;
int answer;

answer=(now-last>3600);
last=now;
return answer;
}


safe to be called from multiple processes, without the value of "last" getting confused between them?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
CygnusEd 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 17:33:39
#56 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 7-Feb-2004
Posts: 393
From: germany

@Hans

I think, I should write some words about my new Cygnix here:

I'm recompiling the whole project to achieve these targets:
* Better performance. As a first step I use now newlib instead of clib2. It's faster now, but still not fast enough. Now the server must be optimized.
* Reduce conflicts with other unix ports and with the OS4-SDK.
* Use a common way to compile/configure all parts of cygnix.

Andrea's firefox binary is already using these new libs.

_________________
X-5000 PPC 5020/2 GHZ, Fractal Define XL R2-Tower, OS 4.1 final update 2, 4 GB, Radeon HD 7770, ESI Juli@ XTe
SAM 460ex/1,15 GHZ, OS 4.1 final, 2 GB, Radeon HD 6450
Amiga 4000D/040 25 Mhz, OS 3.9 BB2, 272 MB, X-Surf, 250 MB ZIP

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Lou 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 18:35:40
#57 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 2-Nov-2004
Posts: 4169
From: Rhode Island

@Chip

Quote:

Chip wrote:
@pixie

Nobody stops you or anybody else to create your own X11 implementation for your beloved platform.

@all

Andrea did a huge step ahead, but it's very far away from the end. Speaking about the bounty now is too early. I'd suggest to calm down and if you want to support Andrea, you can still donate some money to him.



Him?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Hans 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 18:38:47
#58 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 27-Dec-2003
Posts: 5067
From: New Zealand

@CygnusEd

Thanks for the update. Good to hear that performance has already improved.

Hans

_________________
http://hdrlab.org.nz/ - Amiga OS 4 projects, programming articles and more. Home of the RadeonHD driver for Amiga OS 4.x project.
https://keasigmadelta.com/ - More of my work.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tomazkid 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 18:38:52
#59 ]
Team Member
Joined: 31-Jul-2003
Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden

@Lou

Quote:
Him?


Yes.

_________________
Site admins are people too..pooff!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Hans 
Re: Firefox on X11
Posted on 13-Jul-2007 18:46:56
#60 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 27-Dec-2003
Posts: 5067
From: New Zealand

@umisef

Quote:

umisef wrote:
@itix

Quote:
Ahem. Static variables are not problem in library code


Uhm, given that static variables are just the same as globals, only with limited scope, I fail to see how that would work.

If process A stores value 1 in static variable X, then process B stores value 2, then process A reads X and gets... 2; However, process A should have gotten 1.

Yes, one *could* allocate a dedicated memory area for globals/statics on each OpenLibrary; If one were to make a copy of the library structure at the same time (or at least of the user-level accessible parts), one could then access the dedicated, per-process version through the library pointer. But AFAIK, that's not how things work in AmigaOS.

So, how does one make


int it_has_been_a_long_time(time_t now)
{
static time_t last=0;
int answer;

answer=(now-last>3600);
last=now;
return answer;
}


safe to be called from multiple processes, without the value of "last" getting confused between them?



You're not supposed to use static local variables in shared code, unless it's meant to be shared across all processes. You might actually want to have global variables that are not different for each process as they track things common to all (possibly in something like a networking library).

Amiga OS4's library interfaces system allows interfaces to have their own private local variables for each process that obtains an interface.

Hans

_________________
http://hdrlab.org.nz/ - Amiga OS 4 projects, programming articles and more. Home of the RadeonHD driver for Amiga OS 4.x project.
https://keasigmadelta.com/ - More of my work.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next Page )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle