Poster | Thread |
bernd_afa
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 18:51:15
| | [ #161 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 14-Apr-2006 Posts: 829
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @AP >Interesting, although I got other values.
>AmigaOne X1000@1 GHz should be 745,20 sek. (which is even better for the SAM 460ex)
>So a higher clocked SAM 460x would be interesting!
>I don´t know, if the CPU can be over-clocked (like ACube did with the SAMflex), but if yes, this would >be a good base for an "AmigaOnePlus".
the Titan should be with 2 cores and 2 GHZ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titan_%28microprocessor%29
but in wiki stand.
""" but was scrapped in 2010 according to reports. """
look really bad in PPC world....
I guess the 1.8 GHZ pa6 are cheap to have because pa6 normaly is 2 ghz, and those pa6 with 1.8 GHZ do not reach the specs for 2 GHZ, only 1.8 ghz Last edited by bernd_afa on 13-May-2012 at 06:53 PM. Last edited by bernd_afa on 13-May-2012 at 06:53 PM. Last edited by bernd_afa on 13-May-2012 at 06:52 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sundown
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 19:45:31
| | [ #162 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Aug-2003 Posts: 5120
From: Right here... | | |
|
| @bernd_afa
Quote:
I guess the 1.8 GHZ pa6 are cheap to have because pa6 normaly is 2 ghz, and those pa6 with 1.8 GHZ do not reach the specs for 2 GHZ, only 1.8 ghz |
The 2GHz version was required by the military, if the X1000 had one, the price for the system would be double or more over the current price._________________ Hate tends to make you look stupid... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
WolfToTheMoon
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 19:58:07
| | [ #163 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 2-Sep-2010 Posts: 1410
From: CRO | | |
|
| @sundown
according to Varisys, the 2 GHz version was used in marketing material and never really produced or offered for sale. _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 20:24:34
| | [ #164 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| @KimmoK
Because it seems 2.48 and 2.49 versions of blender are slow... Some summary of non 2.48...2.49 results:
112s blender 2.62 PA6T 1.8Ghz Dualcore (LinuxMint) 113s blender 2.62 G4 1.8Ghz DualCPU ! 115s blender 2.43 G5 2.3Ghz Dualcore (erroneously reported singlecore?) 117s blender 2.44 G5 2.3Ghz Dualcore 202s blender 2.5a PowerBook 1667Mhz 205s blender latest PowerBook 1667Mhz (Piru) 256s blender 2.42 PowerBook 1667Mhz 305s blender 2.43 PowerBook 1667Mhz 318s blender 2.44 PMac 1600Mhz 368s blender 2.43 MacMini 1420Mhz
It seems G5 tests should be redone with Linux Mint & 2.62 blender.
Also, it would be nice to see single core result for x1000+blender 2.62. (it should be around 225...235?)
When single core G4 seems faster per Mhz than PA6T per core, in dualcore/dualcpu configuration PA6T scales better and then G4 and PA6T seem equal. With blender 2.62 I expect G5 to jump back to top, because it has signifficantly higher clock rate.
btw. Just out of curiosity, I wonderhow much those dual 1.8Ghz G4 setups cost?
Updating my summary for 2.49/2.48 blender results: With blender 2.49 or 2.48 & dualcore: 120s blender 2.49 G5 2.3Ghz Dualcore 121s blender 2.49 G5 2Ghz Dualcore (erroneously reported singlecore?) 127s blender 2.49 G5 3Ghz Dualcore (erroneously reported singlecore?) 206s blender 2.48? x1000 1800Mhz Dualcore
Then with blender 2.49 or 2.48 & singlecore: 223s blender 2.49 G5 2.3Ghz single core 234s blender 2.49 G5 2.1Ghz single core 235s blender 2.49 G5 3Ghz SingleCore 325s blender 2.49 PowerBook 1667Mhz 331s blender 2.49 PowerBook 1667Mhz 414s blender 2.49 x1000 1800Mhz Single core (AOS4) 420s blender 2.48? x1000 1800Mhz Single core 425s blender 2.48a PowerBook 1500Mhz 538s blender 2.49 MCP8610 1066Mhz 540s blender 2.48 MacMini 1420Mhz 591s blender 2.48 A1XE 1000Mhz 629s blender 2.49 SAM460 1.15Ghz 710s blender 2.49 SAM460ex 1Ghz 1180s blender 2.48 SAM440 800Mhz (AOS4)
SAM460 added, thanks to m3x. Last edited by KimmoK on 15-May-2012 at 05:49 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 14-May-2012 at 10:29 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 14-May-2012 at 10:28 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 14-May-2012 at 10:25 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 14-May-2012 at 10:23 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 14-May-2012 at 10:22 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 14-May-2012 at 10:20 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 13-May-2012 at 08:32 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 13-May-2012 at 08:31 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 13-May-2012 at 08:27 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 13-May-2012 at 08:26 PM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sundown
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 21:48:05
| | [ #165 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Aug-2003 Posts: 5120
From: Right here... | | |
|
| @WolfToTheMoon
"up to 2GHz" was the exact wording, at over $1000 to $2000 each, there was no way it would be selected. Every word counts, but ppl don't read.
_________________ Hate tends to make you look stupid... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
TrevorDick
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 13-May-2012 22:19:40
| | [ #166 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Dec-2004 Posts: 2678
From: Wellington | | |
|
| @sundown
Actually Ken, despite the initial annoucement by PA Semi no 2.0 GHz version were ever produced.
The CPUs are just expensive, there are no cheap versions.
TrevorD
Last edited by TrevorDick on 14-May-2012 at 07:11 AM.
_________________ No, I don't need no reason, I'm just breezin' |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
TrevorDick
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 14-May-2012 11:45:20
| | [ #167 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Dec-2004 Posts: 2678
From: Wellington | | |
|
| @vox
Assuming someone can build a suitable kernel for the Sam I would think so.
TrevorD
_________________ No, I don't need no reason, I'm just breezin' |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 14-May-2012 12:38:54
| | [ #168 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 14-May-2012 16:10:04
| | [ #169 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3957
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @TrevorDick
Quote:
Assuming someone can build a suitable kernel for the Sam I would think so. TrevorD |
Acube soft3D?
It would be best if Acube / A-Eon boards could have been officially supported by developed PPC distro, but that would require some loaner systems and willing persons from Linux community?_________________ OS 3.x AROS and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionalism. Learn it harder way! SinclairQL and WII U lover :D YT http://www.youtube.com/user/rasvoja |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 14-May-2012 16:13:16
| | [ #170 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3957
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @tommysammy
Quote:
Second test AmigaOneX1000 MintPPC |
Mint 11? http://mintppc.org/content/mintppc-11-released
Is it supported out of box or you followed Trevors instructions and kernel?
Now we just need to rip off that CUSA Vision CD and get "ultra modern blah blah operating system of NG Amigas"  _________________ OS 3.x AROS and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionalism. Learn it harder way! SinclairQL and WII U lover :D YT http://www.youtube.com/user/rasvoja |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 14-May-2012 18:24:59
| | [ #171 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @vox
it's a kernel thing. Debian based distros based on Wheezy onwards need a kernel beyond the 2.6.32.x that is currently available for the Sam440ep models. the Sam460ex has a 2.6.38.2 plus one Amigan with the know how has compiled a 3.3.4 version .
http://www.locati.it/mario/sam460/squeeze/#kernel_compilation
Quote:
vox wrote: @TrevorDick
Quote:
Assuming someone can build a suitable kernel for the Sam I would think so. TrevorD |
Acube soft3D?
It would be best if Acube / A-Eon boards could have been officially supported by developed PPC distro, but that would require some loaner systems and willing persons from Linux community? |
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bernd_afa
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 27-May-2012 11:52:11
| | [ #172 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 14-Apr-2006 Posts: 829
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Now there are 2.62 results for X1000, but results for other Macs, SAM need too, to compare
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 14-Aug-2014 9:02:49
| | [ #173 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| @betatesters / TrevorD
Any idea of when we see the performance results of e5500 cores in blender & Linux? _________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 17-Aug-2014 11:16:14
| | [ #174 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9660
From: Unknown | | |
|
| I just did HardInfo benchmarks in debian squeeze (PowerPC 750 emulated on Core i5-2500K 3.3 GHz; QEMU 2.1); lower is better except CPU CryptoHash:
CPU Blowfish- 73.35 CPU CryptoHash - 12.58 CPU Fibonacci - 31.52 CPU N-Queens - 76.83 FPU FFT - 189.67 FPU Raytracing - 449.50
Conclusion: performance of QEMU PowerPC emulation on my PC is comparable to 440EP 800 MHz in integer applications, but much slower in FPU demanding tasks. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 19-Aug-2014 9:22:35
| | [ #175 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9660
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Newer Debian release (Wheezy) gives somewhat better results (again PowerPC 750 emulated on Core i5-2500K 3.3 GHz; QEMU 2.1); lower is better except CPU CryptoHash:
CPU Blowfish- 62.06 CPU CryptoHash - 15.01 CPU Fibonacci - 26.47 CPU N-Queens - 63.34 FPU FFT - 134.05 FPU Raytracing - 371.11
For comparison (see post 98):
Sam460ex 1150 MHz (Debian Squeeze)
CPU Blowfish- 58.944 CPU CryptoHash -19.339 CPU Fibonacci -16.085 CPU N-Queens -42.252 FPU FFT - 60.214 FPU Raytracing -50.750 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 11-Oct-2015 10:46:39
| | [ #176 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @pavlor
Looking for Hardinfo results for G4 machines . _________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 11-Oct-2015 10:58:30
| | [ #177 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9660
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 11-Oct-2015 11:39:25
| | [ #178 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @pavlor
Thanks.
Lame AKsack.wav and Mplayer prometheus-trailer benchmarks tested.
Quote:
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tlosm
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 11-Oct-2015 19:08:03
| | [ #179 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jul-2012 Posts: 2755
From: Amiga land | | |
|
| All
Quad G5 Hardinfo ... NOTE ONLY ONE CORE TESTED BY IT!
Benchmarks **********
CPU Blowfish ------------
-CPU Blowfish- This Machine 2500 MHz 42.411 Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 26.1876862 PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 172.816713
CPU CryptoHash --------------
-CPU CryptoHash- This Machine 2500 MHz 45.913
CPU Fibonacci -------------
-CPU Fibonacci- This Machine 2500 MHz 10.888 Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 8.1375674 PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 58.07682
CPU N-Queens ------------
-CPU N-Queens- This Machine 2500 MHz 17.508
FPU FFT -------
-FPU FFT- This Machine 2500 MHz 13.000
FPU Raytracing --------------
-FPU Raytracing- This Machine 2500 MHz 17.097 Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 40.8816714 PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 161.312647 _________________ I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32; PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB; MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz; #nomorea-eoninmyhome |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 11-Oct-2015 19:18:00
| | [ #180 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Sam460ex 1155MHZ
Benchmarks
CPU Blowfish This Machine 1155 MHz 57.389 Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 26.1876862 PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 172.816713
CPU CryptoHash This Machine 1155 MHz 19.501
CPU Fibonacci This Machine 1155 MHz 16.120 Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 8.1375674 PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 58.07682
CPU N-Queens This Machine 1155 MHz 41.207
FPU FFT This Machine 1155 MHz 56.843
FPU Raytracing This Machine 1155 MHz 48.855 Intel(R) Celeron(R) M processor 1.50GHz (null) 40.8816714 PowerPC 740/750 (280.00MHz) (null) 161.312647 _________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|