Poster | Thread |
amigang
|  |
68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 10-Apr-2025 11:34:27
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jan-2005 Posts: 2120
From: Cheshire, England | | |
|
| So I have been thinking about doing a new A1200 build some point this year, (i got to wait for A1200.net to get me the Cd32 addition case) but have been debating about what to put in it, the new 68K+ platforms are all offering their own unique features and qualities,
Pi5 / mini x86 self build emulation system
Good Points Run my fav distro Amikit XE Have access to Rabbit Hole / Other apps Run other emulator on it / (QEMU AmigaOs4 as example) The Fastest system Could be cheapest system
Bad Points DIY, build it your self, hardware and software Dont have access to some of the custom features of other platform Not 100% accurate Not supporting other efforts
Kinda have it already on my PC
My Original plan, and likely the one I'm still most likely to do, so I can have more freedom on what I can do with the system and what feature I want to add to the platform. Plus this if I go this very high end route would be the only system able to run a fast emulated AmigaOS4 system.
Vampire V4 / Apollo v4
Good Points FPGA system, much more accurate Access to 68080, SAGA, ApolloOS Supporting a cool Amiga effortÂ
Bad Points Cost is a bit high Slowest system Some software issue I’v heard
I always liked the goals of this project and the What If, Motoroal kept developing the 68K platform its presents. The only thing that slightly put me off it was the price and software support (the software support seem to have improved in terms of stabilities, which is good to see.
A1200NG
Good Points Likely Easiest DIY effort for A1200 system Access to Amibench Loads of new Amiga apps and software or setup ready to go Looks to have good dev support
Bad Points Bit pricier than a self build could be Emulation, not 100% accurate Not as fast / powerful as a self build could be
The newest choice / platform on this list from Amigakit, I mean its kinda what my original plan I was going to be, but its all setup and ready to go. It very tempting choice, I wish the system was a little cheaper and faster, as I feel a self build could be done cheaper, however you are supporting one of the few manufactures/stores left in the Amiga scene. Plus the software you get loads of classic Amiga apps updated and a very promising Amibench OS developments.
A1200 + Pistorm
Good Points Could go complete Re-A1200 level 100% original hardware Pistorm Speeds Build would be farily easy
Bad Points Some software issue Not as fast as emulation can be Costs
Pistorm is an amazing addition to the Amiga scene and gives you a super fast Amiga. Plus there is something about still having original hardware in your machine.
PocketStorm / Amicube F1200 / Minimig + Pistorm
Good Points Cheaper FPGA than Vampire Most are in development stages, may need to wait
Bad Points Cost could still be higher than Self build Not as fast as emulation can be Still be a bit DIY Most are in development stages, may need to wait
A very new idea has been to combine FPGA with a Pistorm to give you a super fast and importantly can be a fairly cheap Amiga.
The A1200 (retro games ltd)
Good Points Complete made and ready system
Bad Points Unknown release date Cost might be high
So finally i could just not both with the build and just get Retro Game ltd offering, if it happens.
So as you can see, the Amiga world is far from not having choices, its kinda amazing and I wish to thank all the devs who have made all these choice so competitive with one another. So which platform would you do?
https://poll-maker.com/poll5460175x01A84740-162 Last edited by amigang on 10-Apr-2025 at 11:36 AM. Last edited by amigang on 10-Apr-2025 at 11:35 AM.
_________________ AmigaNG, YouTube, LeaveReality Studio |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pixie
 |  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 10-Apr-2025 22:40:33
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 3446
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
ppcamiga1
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 11-Apr-2025 5:14:38
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 23-Aug-2015 Posts: 991
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @amigang
pistorm is piece of shit that changes your amiga into mouse and keyboard interface for rpi. which is stupid waste of time and money because amiga mouse and keyboard was copied form pc.
If you really want fast 68k amiga use vampire.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pixie
 |  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 11-Apr-2025 8:20:46
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 3446
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
michalsc
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 11-Apr-2025 10:11:34
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
AROS Core Developer  |
Joined: 14-Jun-2005 Posts: 433
From: Germany | | |
|
| @ppcamiga1
here we go again.... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ackcontrls
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 11-Apr-2025 12:02:19
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 22-Apr-2006 Posts: 93
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ppcamiga1 The Vampire and PiStorm accomplish the same goal differently whereas the PiStorm in an A1200 case with a keyboard provide the Amiga experience we enjoyed in the 80s and 90s.
In this century, the PiStorm and the MiniMig (and their derivatives) have done more for the Amiga market than anything else. Had the community rallied around Amithlon back in the day instead of all the nonsense around it being on x86, the Amiga community would undoubtedly be at least a magnitude larger than it is, possibly two.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaMac
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 11-Apr-2025 15:36:20
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 26-Oct-2002 Posts: 1141
From: 3rd Rock from the Sun! | | |
|
| @amigang
I’ll take whatever can run AmigaOS classic (3.2), AOS4.x, and MorphOS. _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
cdimauro
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 12-Apr-2025 5:17:39
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Oct-2012 Posts: 4272
From: Germany | | |
|
| @michalsc
Quote:
michalsc wrote: @ppcamiga1
here we go again.... |
Unfortunately, you can do nothing. It's the poor, gray life of a Hamster:
 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Amiboy
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 12-Apr-2025 15:42:04
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 21-Dec-2003 Posts: 1067
From: At home (probably) | | |
|
| @ppcamiga1
It does?? How does it do that? Please enlighten us _________________
Live Long and keep Amigaing! 
A1200, Power Tower, TF1260 128MB RAM, 68060 Rev 6, OS3.9 BB2, HD-Floppy, Mediator TX+ PCI, Voodoo 3 3000, Soundblaster 4.1, TV Card, Spider USB, 100MBit Ethernet, 16GB CF HD, 52xCDRom. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaMac
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 13-Apr-2025 17:10:25
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 26-Oct-2002 Posts: 1141
From: 3rd Rock from the Sun! | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Amiboy
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 14-Apr-2025 0:04:39
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 21-Dec-2003 Posts: 1067
From: At home (probably) | | |
|
| @AmigaMac
I had completely forgotten that system had been proposed.
IMO given nothing has been seen on the ACA 1240/1260 cards in last couple of years and competitors have gotten "rival" pure 68K chi products out against this (Trinity, TF, Warp) that the boats been missed and the markets not big enough for another product.
But I could easily be wrong. _________________
Live Long and keep Amigaing! 
A1200, Power Tower, TF1260 128MB RAM, 68060 Rev 6, OS3.9 BB2, HD-Floppy, Mediator TX+ PCI, Voodoo 3 3000, Soundblaster 4.1, TV Card, Spider USB, 100MBit Ethernet, 16GB CF HD, 52xCDRom. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaMac
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 14-Apr-2025 1:05:47
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 26-Oct-2002 Posts: 1141
From: 3rd Rock from the Sun! | | |
|
| @Amiboy
I would love to see it reach the market. It's good that the A1200 is getting some innovative attention these days. _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hammer
 |  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 14-Apr-2025 5:18:06
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 9-Mar-2003 Posts: 6320
From: Australia | | |
|
| @ppcamiga1
Quote:
ppcamiga1 wrote: @amigang
pistorm is piece of shit that changes your amiga into mouse and keyboard interface for rpi. which is stupid waste of time and money because amiga mouse and keyboard was copied form pc.
If you really want fast 68k amiga use vampire.
|
False.
PiStorm32-RPi-Emu68 is like a faster Blizzard PPC with BVision RTG without Amiga-related PPC tax https://bigbookofamigahardware.com/bboah/product.aspx?id=462Last edited by Hammer on 14-Apr-2025 at 05:19 AM.
_________________ Amiga 1200 (rev 1D1, KS 3.2, PiStorm32/RPi CM4/Emu68) Amiga 500 (rev 6A, ECS, KS 3.2, PiStorm/RPi 4B/Emu68) Ryzen 9 7950X, DDR5-6000 64 GB RAM, GeForce RTX 4080 16 GB |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaOldskooler
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 14-Apr-2025 5:38:10
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 7-Mar-2015 Posts: 289
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Karlos
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 14-Apr-2025 12:16:25
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 24-Aug-2003 Posts: 4930
From: As-sassin-aaate! As-sassin-aaate! Ooh! We forgot the ammunition! | | |
|
| @amigang
Choice is a good problem to have. Well, at least for those that don't end up stuck with indecision. _________________ Doing stupid things for fun... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaMac
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 14-Apr-2025 19:26:13
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 26-Oct-2002 Posts: 1141
From: 3rd Rock from the Sun! | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
g.bude
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 14-Apr-2025 19:42:26
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 9-Apr-2009 Posts: 13
From: Rimini, Italy | | |
|
| @AmigaMac
I think we need produce some new batches of AGA custom chips.. maybe asking HP? (which has produced some Amiga 1200 chips at its time) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pixie
 |  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 15-Apr-2025 0:44:05
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 3446
From: Figueira da Foz - Portugal | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Amiboy
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 15-Apr-2025 14:58:00
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 21-Dec-2003 Posts: 1067
From: At home (probably) | | |
|
| @AmigaMac
Had also forgotten that project existed too! _________________
Live Long and keep Amigaing! 
A1200, Power Tower, TF1260 128MB RAM, 68060 Rev 6, OS3.9 BB2, HD-Floppy, Mediator TX+ PCI, Voodoo 3 3000, Soundblaster 4.1, TV Card, Spider USB, 100MBit Ethernet, 16GB CF HD, 52xCDRom. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaMac
|  |
Re: 68K+ A1200 Build, which would be best? Posted on 15-Apr-2025 15:46:09
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 26-Oct-2002 Posts: 1141
From: 3rd Rock from the Sun! | | |
|
| @g.bude
Definitely! _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|