Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
12 crawler(s) on-line.
 103 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 number6:  8 mins ago
 OneTimer1:  18 mins ago
 Djk83:  37 mins ago
 zipper:  2 hrs 10 mins ago
 A1200:  2 hrs 20 mins ago
 vox:  2 hrs 35 mins ago
 Hypex:  2 hrs 49 mins ago
 AndreasM:  2 hrs 58 mins ago
 pixie:  3 hrs 6 mins ago
 outlawal2:  3 hrs 8 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga General Chat
      /  Alternate history - Atari 500?
Register To Post

PosterThread
gonegahgah 
Alternate history - Atari 500?
Posted on 7-Jan-2017 11:29:44
#1 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 5-Dec-2008
Posts: 150
From: Australia

It may be sacrilegious but I did ponder recently - and the discussion about Photoshop made me think about it again - what would have happened had Atari gained control of the work from High Torro. The mercenary nature of Atari's act aside, would it have been made just into a games console? Would it have become the Atari ST (but with better specs and OS?)? Or would it have suffered a similar or even a less attractive fate then the current history? Any thoughts on this?

Last edited by gonegahgah on 07-Jan-2017 at 11:30 AM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
BigD 
Re: Alternate history - Atari 500?
Posted on 7-Jan-2017 11:47:33
#2 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Aug-2005
Posts: 7322
From: UK

@gonegahgah

They seemed to want the custom chips not the actual Amiga 1000. The Hi-Toro team would have been disbanded even sooner (i.e. never hired by Atari after delivering the chips) and the Atari ST would have had better hardware but been delayed to market and would have cost more. OS development would have been minimal. Atari proved with the Jaguar that they were no more adept in handling a hardware advantage than Commodore. Sadly the Atari 2600 and Commodore 64 seem to have been one off mega successes for their respective companies, they simply couldn't re-bottle the lightning! A better outcome would have been a merger with Apple. Apple's marketing and in-house software development mixed with the Amiga's great hardware might have given an insurmountable advantage over the rising PC and helped the companies weather the 90s. A deal would have counted on Steve Jobs being a reasonable and balanced human being which sadly he wasn't

_________________
"Art challenges technology. Technology inspires the art."
John Lasseter, Co-Founder of Pixar Animation Studios

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Raffaele 
Re: Alternate history - Atari 500?
Posted on 7-Jan-2017 23:24:36
#3 ]
Super Member
Joined: 7-Dec-2005
Posts: 1906
From: Naples, Italy

@gonegahgah

It had had been developed a different ST wirh more graphics and music and more performant on games but with ugly Atari TOS.
But it had achieved full support and marketing by mother firm Atari so custoomers had had been more satisfied with it than it happened Commodore Amiga and Atari ST...
It had had featured external SCSI interface for hard disks and practical MIDI port as it happened with real ST so it had been again better practical music machine but unfortunately as long as ATARI was never interested in videomaking or connecting to TVs with a better signal ratio and with practical common TV ports, it had had been doomed showing better resolution and gorgeous color graphics only on dedicated expensive video monitors so it had had never hit market of video productions.
Newer versions had had sported more powerful processors, as this always was ATARI policy (opposite to Commodore) so customers had been completely satisfied with 68020, 68030, 68040 and PPC processors, so again it had been used as powerful machine for 3D developing as lomg as it was Amiga in its best times.
If ATARI had recognized the trend of whats had been happening with personal 3D making, sooner or later it had been equipping it with powerful internal 3D chip that had helped.3D produtions, game making, and game playing too, preceding and predating Sony Playstation, so this fabulous never born Amtari had had been still today on the market.

Steve Jobs had had reviewed it at CES Computer Show and had had judged this Amtari a computer with "Too much 3D Hardware"...

Last edited by Raffaele on 07-Jan-2017 at 11:31 PM.

_________________
"When the Amiga came out, everyone [at Apple] was scared as hell." (J.L. Gassée, former CEO of Apple France and chief of devs of Mac II-fx, interviewed by Amazing Computing, Nov 1996).

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle