Poster | Thread |
OlafS25
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 16-Nov-2020 18:44:54
| | [ #41 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6339
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @bison
In my view best supporting virtual environments and hosted versions would have been best chance for Aros (or general exotic operating systems) because it is difficult to support the countless different hardware options. That is valid for X86/AMD64. On ARM there would be RPi as a nice and relative stable and well documented hardware. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
BSzili
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 16-Nov-2020 20:46:54
| | [ #42 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 16-Nov-2013 Posts: 447
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @OlafS25
I can't see any reason why it wouldn't work, as the current PPC version already runs in QEMU. The issue is that you probably won't be able register it, because registration keys are tied to the hardware. This is what I meant by lack of official support. Unless they do away for the current registration scheme, you will be limited to 30 minute sessions in the VM. _________________ This is just like television, only you can see much further. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OneTimer1
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 16-Nov-2020 22:15:29
| | [ #43 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 3-Aug-2015 Posts: 980
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
OneTimer1
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 16-Nov-2020 22:42:46
| | [ #44 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 3-Aug-2015 Posts: 980
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @kolla
Quote:
kolla wrote: It shouldn’t be rocket science to port the linux kernel to run ontop of Quark ... |
AFAIK there will be a new kernel and I don't believe if it is based on Quark:
Quote:
IMR the Quark kernel was hidden deeply somewhere under the ABox that should only have been a sandbox interface for backward compatibility ... but that's history.Last edited by OneTimer1 on 16-Nov-2020 at 10:51 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OneTimer1
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 16-Nov-2020 23:01:35
| | [ #45 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 3-Aug-2015 Posts: 980
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @sTix
Quote:
Anyone knows the origins of Quark? Is it based on something proven like L4*? |
No, I don't know. But I can use Google: Quote:
The Quark microkernel borrows concepts from the L4 microkernel family but is not an L4 implementation itself. For example the clan (group of tasks), ID concept and recursive address mapping comes from L4. Quark also has an asynchronous/synchronous message interface similar to Amiga's Exec kernel but adapted to the memory protected environment.
|
For the name I can only guess: What's smaller than an atom? A quark |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sTix
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 17-Nov-2020 11:30:58
| | [ #46 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 22-Oct-2003 Posts: 138
From: Lund, Sweden | | |
|
| @OneTimer1
Thanks, I assumed this to be ungoogleable (probably not a valid word, but you get what I mean), my bad.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bison
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 17-Nov-2020 17:26:51
| | [ #47 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2007 Posts: 2112
From: N-Space | | |
|
| @sTix
It seems that unGoogleable is a word.
_________________ "Unix is supposed to fix that." -- Jay Miner |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sTix
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 17-Nov-2020 19:18:22
| | [ #48 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 22-Oct-2003 Posts: 138
From: Lund, Sweden | | |
|
| @bison
Nice. It's a high quality word. Now that it's mainstream, I think I'll start using unaltavistable instead. Or perhaps unwebcrawlable. They are both ungoogleable. _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 18-Nov-2020 15:34:10
| | [ #49 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11215
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @sTix
What about unbingable? Or unyahooable? Unstartpageable. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
bison
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 18-Nov-2020 19:54:28
| | [ #50 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 18-Dec-2007 Posts: 2112
From: N-Space | | |
|
| @Hypex
Quote:
What about unbingable? Or unyahooable? Unstartpageable. |
Or unduckable.
DuckDuckGo is an unfortunate name on more than one level. It's still my favorite search engine, even though they have trouble actually finding anything._________________ "Unix is supposed to fix that." -- Jay Miner |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sTix
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 18-Nov-2020 20:48:05
| | [ #51 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 22-Oct-2003 Posts: 138
From: Lund, Sweden | | |
|
| @Hypex
Unstartpageable is brilliant. It's not even worth looking for it, you won't be able to see it anyway, even if you find it (which you won't of course). In way it reminds me of the expression 'you're not even wrong'.
Sorry for derailing the thread. Let's hope MorphOS x64 isn't to far away. And that they find a good balance between clean cuts and something that attracts the retro minded.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sTix
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 18-Nov-2020 20:57:06
| | [ #52 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 22-Oct-2003 Posts: 138
From: Lund, Sweden | | |
|
| @bison
It's a bit surprising that there's no positive (non-negated) word using 404 for this. I can't find any at least (but then again, it's ungoogleable). I have no clue how that would look though, that's something you native speakers need to figure out
Maybe something with an Amiga twist would work as well, Taboric? Is that a word?
Edit - Oh, taboric really is a word. I guess it could be used to refer to something that cannot be found Last edited by sTix on 18-Nov-2020 at 09:02 PM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 19-Nov-2020 15:45:29
| | [ #53 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11215
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
retro
| |
Re: Morphos x64 Posted on 19-Nov-2020 20:06:02
| | [ #54 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 16-Dec-2003 Posts: 1049
From: Unknown | | |
|
| I Hope IT Will be a furture proof concept and not a retro projekt |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|