| Poster | Thread |
diegocr
|  |
Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 3:06:10
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 7-Jun-2006 Posts: 193
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
 |  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 3:15:37
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @diegocr
Moving to general computing forum.
Regarding 1 sec boot, well, impressive indeed, but, that is for embedded, and we would like OS4 to remain usable as desktop OS as well, no?  _________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 7:07:10
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5214
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| 1 second is not enough to start up the HW of a personal home computer.
"The DMA agents can move many boot tasks between flash memory and the processor memory and can accomplish this task in the background without processor overhead. “These days, CPUs have a pretty large cache memory, so they are capable of doing all these things in parallel"
If they manage to get linux to boot in one second (after the HW is on), AOS4&MOS&AROS should aim to 100ms with the same tools.
(if x1000's CPU has 2Mb of L2 RAM (like PA6T), it would/could/can help a lot) _________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaOneProductions
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 9:00:47
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2006 Posts: 717
From: Ingle land | | |
|
| @diegocr
That reminds me of when I first started with computers, they all used to boot up in about 1 second, the operating system of the ZX Spectrum was ready in about 1 second, saying Quote:
| © 1982 Sinclair Research Ltd |
Loading the applications from tape however, took a good deal longer _________________
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
olegil
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 12:03:14
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 22-Aug-2003 Posts: 5900
From: Work | | |
|
| @diegocr
While not in the least useful for desktop applications, this is something I need to look into for my company's embedded devices. Didn't know. Thanks! _________________ This weeks pet peeve: Using "voltage" instead of "potential", which leads to inventing new words like "amperage" instead of "current" (I, measured in A) or possible "charge" (amperehours, Ah or Coulomb, C). Sometimes I don't even know what people mean. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Darth_X
 |  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 13:35:46
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 1-Jun-2003 Posts: 2997
From: Vancouver Island, Canada | | |
|
| @olegil
Quote:
olegil wrote: @diegocr
While not in the least useful for desktop applications, this is something I need to look into for my company's embedded devices. Didn't know. Thanks! |
Have you looked into using OS4 for embedded applications? _________________ Men who have girlies in their avatars are Girliemen! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
olegil
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 13:49:16
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 22-Aug-2003 Posts: 5900
From: Work | | |
|
| @Darth_X
On devices that aren't supported by OS4? _________________ This weeks pet peeve: Using "voltage" instead of "potential", which leads to inventing new words like "amperage" instead of "current" (I, measured in A) or possible "charge" (amperehours, Ah or Coulomb, C). Sometimes I don't even know what people mean. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
RodTerl
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 13:52:55
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 6-Sep-2004 Posts: 589
From: Rossendale | | |
|
| Runs >NIL: stuff in parralel in boot?..
Only loads the modules that are needed?
uses RAM: disk instead of buffers?
Only loads teh startup routines to initialise the system then loads the main code (libraries?) as required?
THESE GUYS HAVE REDISCOVERED AMIGA?
And people have laughed at the outmoded and outdated ideas of AOS.. ok, for some situations it is.
Then again, Concorde is old, slow, obsolete and outdated.
Will be intresting if the ludicrous speed boot kernal can be combined with the setup for the bulk heavy processing requirements of modern (?) desktops, to let your AI unlock the car door as you blip the keyfob, then set off to your destination as youve asked for getting in the door.
Finally, after nearly 30 years, people are getting round to program computers as theyve been taught? Because of the limitations of market and management?
_________________ The older and more respected a scientist is, the longer it takes to prove him wrong. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomas
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 14:08:00
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Jul-2003 Posts: 4286
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tomazkid
Quote:
tomazkid wrote: @diegocr
Moving to general computing forum.
Regarding 1 sec boot, well, impressive indeed, but, that is for embedded, and we would like OS4 to remain usable as desktop OS as well, no?  |
According to article: Quote:
| These fast-boot developments are not necessarily limited to real-time or an embedded Linux; however, they can get a conventional Linux distribution to boot in 1 second, as well. |
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
opi
 |  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 14:40:40
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 2-Mar-2005 Posts: 2752
From: Poland | | |
|
| @RodTerl
Quote:
| Runs >NIL: stuff in parralel in boot?.. |
You compare something so trivial as RUN to launchd?
Quote:
| Only loads the modules that are needed? |
Was always present in Linux.
Quote:
| THESE GUYS HAVE REDISCOVERED AMIGA? |
No. There's nothing powerful about AmigaOS startup procedure. Startup-sequence and User-Startup does not give you so much flexibility as other solutions._________________ OpenWindows Initiative. Port PS3 hardware to bananas. For free. Join today and receive expired $50 cupon from AI! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
olegil
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 14:54:28
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 22-Aug-2003 Posts: 5900
From: Work | | |
|
| @opi
To be quite honest, the boot time in Ubuntu increased dramatically for me about one year ago.
And I actually think that with some sensible work here and there AmigaOS could be just as fast as Montavista.
Preload sensible stuff in a ramdisk (or better yet, preload a sensible starting point for a wake-up-from-disk in the bootloader, using DMA) and run through all the driver initialisation processes in parallell, then you'll be pretty close. _________________ This weeks pet peeve: Using "voltage" instead of "potential", which leads to inventing new words like "amperage" instead of "current" (I, measured in A) or possible "charge" (amperehours, Ah or Coulomb, C). Sometimes I don't even know what people mean. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
opi
 |  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 15:04:24
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 2-Mar-2005 Posts: 2752
From: Poland | | |
|
| @olegil
Quote:
| To be quite honest, the boot time in Ubuntu increased dramatically for me about one year ago. |
They did some experimental work with laucnhd IIRC. I have skipped few Ubuntu releases due lack of quality so I have no experience to compare.
Quote:
| And I actually think that with some sensible work here and there AmigaOS could be just as fast as Montavista. |
Sure. There's no magic here. I just try to refute this "AmigaOS did it first, it's so awesome, damn copycats!" statements. You can speed up boot procedure of any OS. _________________ OpenWindows Initiative. Port PS3 hardware to bananas. For free. Join today and receive expired $50 cupon from AI! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 15:49:51
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5214
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomas
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 15:58:41
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Jul-2003 Posts: 4286
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @KimmoK My a1200 with a blizzard 68020/4meg accelerator boots 3.1 in less than 5 seconds as well using a regular IDE hard drive. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
eder
 |  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 16:38:35
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 16-Mar-2004 Posts: 280
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @diegocr
Is it not better to have a stable Os? so you dont have to resteart it ... |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 16:59:52
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5214
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| @eder
There is no OS that does not need restarting.
But, yes, stability is very very important. _________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomas
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 17:17:36
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Jul-2003 Posts: 4286
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @KimmoK
Quote:
KimmoK wrote: @eder
There is no OS that does not need restarting.
But, yes, stability is very very important. |
Linux is pretty damn close though.. My linux box that i use as main computer did 250 days twice in a row. It has so far not crashed in the last 3 years even once, even though i use it heavily daily. The only time it was rebooted was due to swapping hard drives or power outages. I am currently at 83 days and i bet it will do a year if i dont have power outage before then. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
 |  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 17:59:32
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @Tomas
Yes, Linux only requires rebooting when you need to change kernel really. Though, Windows 2008 is the best windows this far what comes to stability, my W2k8 I use as desktop was booted 65 days ago, and that was due to a system update, so did that manually, w2k8 has never crashed, been using it almost a year now. _________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
diegocr
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 18:10:42
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 7-Jun-2006 Posts: 193
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Tomas
Quote:
| These fast-boot developments are not necessarily limited to real-time or an embedded Linux; however, they can get a conventional Linux distribution to boot in 1 second, as well. |
Yeah, you get the point! congrats
Quote:
| And I actually think that with some sensible work here and there AmigaOS could be just as fast as Montavista. |
That's the idea, i think we can attract a lot more users to our world/community if we can announce the X1000 as booting in one-or-two seconds (imo), as one of its innumerable features, of course |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
|  |
Re: Booting the machine in ONE SECOND Posted on 8-Mar-2010 19:02:17
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5214
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|