@Tuxedo

Some more x5000 results:

RAGEMEM:

Quote:

5.Work:tests> RageMem RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010 CPU: Freescale P50XX (E5500 core) 1.2 @ 1995 Mhz Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none Cache Line: 64 --- CPU --- MAX MIPS: 3982 --- L1 --- READ32: 7584 MB/Sec READ64: 15146 MB/Sec WRITE32: 7586 MB/Sec WRITE64: 15150 MB/Sec --- L2 --- READ32: 4302 MB/Sec READ64: 7774 MB/Sec WRITE32: 5042 MB/Sec WRITE64: 8851 MB/Sec --- RAM --- READ32: 731 MB/Sec READ64: 1378 MB/Sec WRITE32: 996 MB/Sec WRITE64: 996 MB/Sec WRITE: 2319 MB/Sec (Tricky) --- VIDEO BUS --- READ: 54 MB/Sec WRITE: 540 MB/Sec

C-RAY:

Quote:

5.Work:tests/c-ray-1.1> c-ray-f -i scene -o foo.ppm Rendering took: 2 seconds (2575 milliseconds) 5.Work:tests/c-ray-1.1> c-ray-f -i sphfract -o foo.ppm Rendering took: 67 seconds (67864 milliseconds)

LAME

Quote:

4.Work:tests> lame WhereDoAllTheJunkiesComeFrom.wav LAME 3.99.5 32bits (http://lame.sf.net) Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 16538 Hz - 17071 Hz Encoding WhereDoAllTheJunkiesComeFrom.wav to WhereDoAllTheJunkiesComeFrom.mp3 Encoding as 44.1 kHz j-stereo MPEG-1 Layer III (11x) 128 kbps qval=3 Frame | CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU | ETA 9467/9467 (100%)| 0:27/ 0:27| 0:27/ 0:27| 9.0855x| 0:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- kbps LR MS % long switch short % 128.0 6.3 93.7 88.1 6.8 5.1 Writing LAME Tag...done ReplayGain: -5.4dB

Filecopy tests, NGFS (that one which come with public ISO):

Quote:

4.Work:tests> mkfile work:foo 200000000 4.Work:tests> copy work:foo ram: 2 seconds 4.Work:tests> copy work:foo work:foo2 8 seconds

As for Nbench, how long it should work before showing results ? I just run it, and leave it for about 5 or 10 minutes, and nothing happens. I.e. it runs, but then i can't see any sing of life.

Also what Cube tests you use, i found on os4depot boingcube and cubem , both benchmarks.

Last edited by kas1e on 25-Apr-2017 at 03:23 PM.
Last edited by kas1e on 25-Apr-2017 at 03:21 PM.
Last edited by kas1e on 25-Apr-2017 at 03:09 PM.
Last edited by kas1e on 25-Apr-2017 at 02:59 PM.
Last edited by kas1e on 25-Apr-2017 at 02:57 PM.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

@kas1e

Thanks. I try to test.

Virginio

Here's mine:

Quote:

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010 CPU: Unknown 0.0 @ 1600 Mhz Caches Sizes: L1: 16 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none Cache Line: 0 ---> CPU MAX MIPS: 4772 ---> L1 READ32: 6070 MB/Sec READ64: 12135 MB/Sec WRITE32: 5202 MB/Sec WRITE64: 4048 MB/Sec ---> L2 READ32: 2723 MB/Sec READ64: 3534 MB/Sec WRITE32: 2450 MB/Sec WRITE64: 3093 MB/Sec ---> RAM READ32: 299 MB/Sec READ64: 299 MB/Sec WRITE32: 436 MB/Sec WRITE64: 436 MB/Sec WRITE: 539 MB/Sec (Tricky) ---> VIDEO BUS READ: 32 MB/Sec WRITE: 126 MB/Sec

^^The tested system is a very old PMAC 3.1 with upgraded is PROCESSOR: 7451 (G4) (V2.3) 1600MHz (FSB 100MHz) and Radeon 9800 Pro 256MB flashed from PC on MorphOS 3.9. idk why it listed the cpu as unknown.

Last edited by Cool_amigaN on 25-Apr-2017 at 04:23 PM.
Last edited by Cool_amigaN on 25-Apr-2017 at 04:22 PM.
Last edited by Cool_amigaN on 25-Apr-2017 at 04:21 PM.

_________________

PowerMac G5 Dual 2,7 GHz MorphOS (on single CPU):

Quote:

RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010 CPU: Unknown 0.0 @ 2700 Mhz Caches Sizes: L1: 64 KB - L2: 512 KB - L3: none Cache Line: 0 --- CPU --- MAX MIPS: 5384 --- L1 --- READ32: 13743 MB/Sec READ64: 19132 MB/Sec WRITE32: 10273 MB/Sec WRITE64: 20472 MB/Sec --- L2 --- READ32: 12815 MB/Sec READ64: 16879 MB/Sec WRITE32: 9878 MB/Sec WRITE64: 19559 MB/Sec --- RAM --- READ32: 2982 MB/Sec READ64: 3002 MB/Sec WRITE32: 1451 MB/Sec WRITE64: 1563 MB/Sec WRITE: 432 MB/Sec (Tricky) --- VIDEO BUS --- READ: 20 MB/Sec WRITE: 203 MB/Sec

@kas1e

thank you for tests.

ATM that wa a bit weird...lame was a bit slòower than on my G4@1131 maybe becaiuse of AltiVec or some kernel problem dunno...
cray was about 30% faster.
File copy really FAST(thanks to sata naturally)

For test that dont works maybe only some incompatibility...

If you can do the Quake and ffmpeg test we can have a complete idea of the current performance on heavy tasks...naturally on general use like netsurfing and other tasks general performance thanks to modern graphic cards, ddr3 and sata will gives a ectra speed up experience...


Amnd also as stated above maybe things will improve in future(and the blender linux test with same blender version will say something for that)...

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

@Tuxedo

I can do tests with quake and ffmpeg of course, but description of how to do it on first page a bit chaotic.

For ffmpeg i need just link to video which i can download (without all those getvideo things, etc), then actual version of ffmpeg which need to use and from where to download it (os4depot? but there is probably newer than your old one in tests), and then actual command to check.

For quake, i need exactly what version to download (there was many, max's one, huno's one and some another one), also is it quake1 or 2 or 3, also what exactly to run (timedemo or what where etc).

Then i can give you results :)

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

@kas1e

How about the Warp Nova Cow 3D benchmark ?

https://keasigmadelta.com/assets/Uploads/Cow3D6-NoInfoBar.lha
https://keasigmadelta.com/blog/warp3d-novas-performance-boost-partially-hidden-by-lazy-cow/

_________________
Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card

@kas1e

Quake III, timedemo demo four, 1600x1200 please.

@recedent

Used old ioquake which works over minigl/old-w3d. Everything in maximum in the options (32bits,texture quality 32bit, texture filter trilinear, color depth 32 bit, gl extensions on, all maximum):

640x480: 12.5 seconds, 100.7 fps
1024x768: 14.1 seconds, 90.1 fps
1600x1200: 17.4 seconds 72.4 fps

Last edited by kas1e on 26-Apr-2017 at 04:15 PM.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

@Spectre

Downloaded https://keasigmadelta.com/assets/Uploads/Cow3D6-NoInfoBar.lha

Just unpacked and run: in the console hae all the time 1378. Pressing "b" change nothing, same 1378.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

@kas1e

If you have time, could you try this version of MiniGL http://capehill.kapsi.fi/minigl/

It performs a tiny bit faster on Sam440, and I have been wondering does it have a noticiable difference on faster machines.

@Mr_Capehill

Yes should be a lot faster on faster computer, X5000 has good PCIe bus, that helps a lot.

Daniel Müßener is working on new MiniGL that's going to use Nova as back-end I expect to be even faster. then what ever you can get now.

_________________
http://lifeofliveforit.blogspot.no/
Facebook::LiveForIt Software for AmigaOS

@Mr_Capehill
Are you sure it working version ? I just unpacked it, and copy minigl.library, reboot.
Then "version full:libs minigl.library" says can't find version info for.

Then, when i run any minigl app, i have shell window in which "close amigalibs called" 2 times and nothing else.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

@kas1e

MD5sum for the lib should be e0e27894e2b6072c49b18af4eb35de1e

For me the version works.

@Mr_Capehill

Just was read protected after unapcking :) Now it works. Tried the same ioquake3, same settings as before, 1600x1200, give 73.7 fps. Which is about the same, faster on 1 fps only.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

@kas1e

Thanks for testing.

@kas1e

No problem.

The range of scores thus far is from 1558-1112 .

Quote:

kas1e wrote: @Spectre Downloaded https://keasigmadelta.com/assets/Uploads/Cow3D6-NoInfoBar.lha Just unpacked and run: in the console hae all the time 1378. Pressing "b" change nothing, same 1378.

_________________
Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card

@kas1e

Quote:

1600x1200: 17.4 seconds 72.4 fps

That's nice! On par with my machine (equipped with Radeon X850XT) - 72.2 FPS.

@recedent
Still should be probably twice as fast if take in account gfx cards specs. Probably usual warp3d/minigl combo.

_________________
Join us to improve dopus5!
zerohero's mirror of os4/os3 crosscompiler suites

@kas1e

Ok, now I'm on tablet and tired...tomorrow try to update instructions....

Good night guys

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.