Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
|
|
|
|
Poster | Thread | Tigger
| |
Re: Sub-thread concerning comments mad in Amiga inc Hires Jamie Krueger Posted on 31-Jan-2008 17:27:06
| | [ #1 ] |
| |
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 2-May-2003 Posts: 2097
From: Rocket City, USA | | |
|
| @Lou
Quote:
Lou wrote:
See prior post on accepting payments regarding Amino. Olaf allowed access to the CVS and that speaks of itself, I don't need to defend it.
|
Except you point was about Hyperion paying Olaf and Hyperion paid Olaf nothing from when he signed the contract until sometime in 2006 and even then only paid less then 10%.
Quote:
As for ITEC, they perported themselves as successors and that contract should be invalidated.
|
No evidence of this has been shown. The contract in fact does not say they are a successor, they did not have several things they would need to be a successor and yet Hyperion signed the contract and took the money.
Quote:
As for KMOS, that admit to not being a party to the contract yet try to exercise rights to it. [quote] After the buyback the contract doesnt make alot of sense, thats the point between AI and Hyperion.
[quote] 1) Not directly providing source forcing Hyperion to pay for it themselves
|
No proof Hyperion asked for the source, on the other hand we know for sure that 1) Hyperion negotiated contract for Olafs OS 3.1 version before Nov 3, 2001 2) Hyperion signed contracts with others for OS 4.0 before Nov 3, 2001 4) Amino had a copy of the original 3.1 source
All of that is in the court documents.
Quote:
2) Attempting to transfer rights of the contract without permission
|
Hyperion signed the sale document, AI agreed to allow the buyback to occur, Eyetech didnt have to approve for the sale of the OS back to Amino, why would they have to approve the sale to Itec, and if they did have to, then this is only something Eyetech can complain about not Eyetech who willingly signed the contract and took the money.
Quote:
3) Not notifying Hyperion of there insolvency in order to avoid triggering the clause |
Because they werent insolvent under Title 11. -Tig
_________________ We played the first thing that came to our heads, it just happened to be the best song in the world. |
| Status: Offline |
| |
|
|
|
[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ]
[ forums ][ classifieds ]
[ links ][ news archive ]
[ link to us ][ user account ]
|