Poster | Thread |
TheDungeonDelver
|  |
So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 17:41:17
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 17-Apr-2004 Posts: 815
From: Unknown | | |
|
| what are the implications? _________________ The problem with AmigaOS on PPC isn't that PPC is big-endian. The problem with AmigaOS on PPC is that PPC is dead-endian. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Fransexy
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 17:44:31
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 8-Jun-2004 Posts: 2334
From: Elche (Alicante), spain | | |
|
| @TheDungeonDelver
Quote:
TheDungeonDelver wrote: what are the implications? |
Thom Holwerda have to eat his socks and upload the video to youtube _________________ No PowerPC, No Fun Make Amiga Great Again |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sundown
 |  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:06:35
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Aug-2003 Posts: 5120
From: Right here... | | |
|
| @TheDungeonDelver
It means we will have a mil spec Amiga, Doomy will finally be able to replace his mil spec A2000 with a new system. 
Until the cpu is officially announced, it's still a guess, but a very good guess.  _________________ Hate tends to make you look stupid... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
HammerD
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:11:08
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 31-Oct-2003 Posts: 935
From: Ontario, Canada | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaBlitter
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:13:12
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 26-Sep-2005 Posts: 3523
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @TheDungeonDelver
Quote:
what are the implications? |
Pancakes?
_________________ retired |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:16:50
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9693
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @HammerD
Quote:
1000 SpecInt2000 and 1500-2000 SpecFp2000 (according to PA Semi estimation).
For comparison: 7455 1 GHz (PowerMac G4) 307 SpecInt2000 and 188 SpecFp2000 (benchmarked by ct magazine). |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
HammerD
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:22:15
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 31-Oct-2003 Posts: 935
From: Ontario, Canada | | |
|
| @pavlor
It's certainly very fast compared to existing PowerPC chips that run OS4. _________________ AmigaOS 4.x Beta Tester - Classic Amiga enthusiast - http://www.hd-zone.com is my Amiga Blog, check it out! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:25:09
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9693
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @HammerD
Quote:
It's certainly very fast compared to existing PowerPC chips that run OS4. |
Yes. And unique. AmigaOne X1000 is (and will be) probably sole personal/desktop computer that uses this CPU! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
DrZarkov
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:26:56
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 10-Apr-2009 Posts: 159
From: Dschörmännie | | |
|
| And now please compare it to the Intel i7 950, which costs the same...
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
HammerD
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:29:14
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 31-Oct-2003 Posts: 935
From: Ontario, Canada | | |
|
| @DrZarkov
I would compare it if that Intel chip ran OS4 natively. I am talking about existing chips that run OS 4.
Otherwise you are comparing apples to oranges, eg. there is no point. _________________ AmigaOS 4.x Beta Tester - Classic Amiga enthusiast - http://www.hd-zone.com is my Amiga Blog, check it out! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:30:38
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9693
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @DrZarkov
Quote:
And now please compare it to the Intel i7 950, which costs the same... |
i7 950 is probably 4 times faster (in sense Y=4*X) in integer operations and 3 times faster in FPU operations (single core performance). It is the same difference as between 68060 50 MHz and Pentium 200. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hyperionmp
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:37:27
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
 |
Hyperion  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 502
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @TheDungeonDelver
It is unwise to spread this type of unconfirmed rumours.
Whatever people believe they have seen or not seen, I certainly do not want any disappointed users blaming A-EON and/or Hyperion Entertainment for speculation by third parties.
It should be pointed out that measures were taken to throw up "funny answers" when people tried to find out the identity of the CPU.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AP
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:41:52
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 617
From: Vienna/Austria | | |
|
| @Hyperionmp: >Whatever people believe they have seen or not seen, I certainly do not want any disappointed >users blaming A-EON and/or Hyperion Entertainment for speculation by third parties.
I hope this doesn´t mean, that the CPU of the X1000 is less powerful than the PA6T. _________________ AmigaOne X5000/40, 2.2 Ghz, 4 GB RAM, Radeon R9 280X, M-Audio Revolution 5.1, 240 GB SSD |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Troels
 |  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:42:36
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2005
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Hyperionmp
Quote:
It should be pointed out that measures were taken to throw up "funny answers" when people tried to find out the identity of the CPU. |
And I thought Hyperion were short on manpower
What ever the CPU turns out to be I just hope to see OS4 make the most of the X1000. My bet is still on the PA6T though._________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:42:41
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9693
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Hyperionmp
Quote:
I certainly do not want any disappointed users blaming A-EON and/or Hyperion Entertainment for speculation by third parties. |
It would be great disappointment if the selected CPU is less powerful than PA6T... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
TheDungeonDelver
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:46:44
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 17-Apr-2004 Posts: 815
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Hyperionmp
So you went through all the trouble to create some kind of pretend program that throws up fake PCI identifiers and hand coded in all of the pointers to the PA6T?
There's exactly two answers here: one is, yes, you did that. The other is, no, you didn't do that, and in fact you didn't think to do that to "hide" the CPU.
So, given that, either you're hiding the PA6T because that's not the final CPU and it is in fact only on these reference boards you have, and you won't use it on the end system, or for whatever reason, you're playing footsie with the community and trying to be clever and hiding the PA6T, except you got caught out.
_________________ The problem with AmigaOS on PPC isn't that PPC is big-endian. The problem with AmigaOS on PPC is that PPC is dead-endian. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
TheDungeonDelver
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:50:13
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 17-Apr-2004 Posts: 815
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @AmigaBlitter
I'm an omelet guy myself. _________________ The problem with AmigaOS on PPC isn't that PPC is big-endian. The problem with AmigaOS on PPC is that PPC is dead-endian. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
eliyahu
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:53:42
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 3-Mar-2010 Posts: 1971
From: Waterbury, Connecticut (USA) | | |
|
| @TheDungeonDelver
Quote:
TheDungeonDelver wrote:
So, given that, either you're hiding the PA6T because that's not the final CPU and it is in fact only on these reference boards you have, and you won't use it on the end system, or for whatever reason, you're playing footsie with the community and trying to be clever and hiding the PA6T, except you got caught out. |
yeah, i think the 'jig is up' on this one. it could always be a successor device, but i doubt it.
Quote:
what are the implications? |
one implication is that, whereas before i was not planning on raising the cash to buy this thing -- i am now.
-- eliyahu _________________ "Physical reality is consistent with universal laws. When the laws do not operate, there is no reality. All of this is unreal." |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hyperionmp
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:55:35
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
 |
Hyperion  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 502
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @TheDungeonDelver
We're simply not disclosing this information as this stage yet.
All in due time.
A working system was demonstrated running AmigaOS 4.1, the motherboard was shown, Varisys has 3 senior people in attendance to field questions etc.
All in good time please.
There will be plenty of more announcements to follow. _________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
DBAlex
|  |
Re: So now that we know the CPU is a PA6T Posted on 21-Jun-2010 18:58:15
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 23-Jul-2006 Posts: 756
From: UK | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|