Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
14 crawler(s) on-line.
 123 guest(s) on-line.
 1 member(s) on-line.


 Rob

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 Rob:  4 mins ago
 Ratta:  12 mins ago
 pixie:  15 mins ago
 RobertB:  16 mins ago
 MagicSN:  22 mins ago
 aerocitygirls:  36 mins ago
 ncafferkey:  58 mins ago
 Hypex:  1 hr 1 min ago
 matthey:  1 hr 43 mins ago
 DiscreetFX:  2 hrs 3 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga Inc. offshoot
      /  what is your primary expectation of a contemporary amiga company to deliver (beyond what is currently available)
Register To Post

Poll : custom amiga branded case, form factor accomodating all motherboards for the current amiga derivates, sticker optional
custom amiga branded keyboard with an original layout
support 68k chipset/cpu in fpga compatible development, attempt to achieve an asic solution
deliver new hardware for and support os4
deliver new hardware for and support morphos
support aros and donate to the associated bounties
deliver x86 hardware and seamless emulation for the existing amiga derivates
nothing of the above
 
PosterThread
jkirk 
Re: cusa proposition
Posted on 20-Dec-2011 16:07:59
#1 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jan-2005
Posts: 3349
From: Georgia (usa)

@ddni

Quote:
because id like to go beyond discussion about that company,


did you read this? if not please consider removing the comment from your post.

Last edited by jkirk on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:09 PM.

_________________
Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
 Top | Parent

Replies
SubjectPosterDate
      Re: cusa propositionddni20-Dec-2011 16:12:36
          Re: cusa propositionwawa20-Dec-2011 16:22:50
              Re: cusa propositionddni20-Dec-2011 16:26:40
                  Re: cusa propositionwawa20-Dec-2011 16:30:54
                      Re: cusa propositionddni20-Dec-2011 16:31:34
                          Re: cusa propositionvox20-Dec-2011 17:34:41


PosterThread
damocles 
Re: cusa proposition
Posted on 20-Dec-2011 17:37:04
#1 ]
Super Member
Joined: 22-Dec-2007
Posts: 1719
From: Unknown

@ddni

Quote:
It is missing the ONLY option that I would consider choosing " CUSA should go and rot in a hole"


I guess haters have to hate.

_________________
Dammy

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
 Top | Parent

Replies
SubjectPosterDate
      Re: cusa propositionddni20-Dec-2011 17:42:40
          Re: cusa propositiondamocles20-Dec-2011 18:00:18


PosterThread
vox 
Re: cusa proposition
Posted on 20-Dec-2011 18:20:55
#1 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-Jun-2005
Posts: 3736
From: Belgrade, Serbia

@ddni

Quote:
This is a joke of a poll. It is missing the ONLY option that I would consider choosing " CUSA should go and rot in a hole"


Its interesting to see that this forum is Amiga Inc. offshoot forum :)
Just to know ...

Its interesting that people DO BELIEVE what ..?
That CUSA can:

- actually develop system?
- Order from their factories in China if get 500 preorders
- Improve existing OS4 / AROS-Natami / MOS products?
- Have alliance wih Hyperion/Acube based on joint product Hyperion
was never asked for?
- Buy existing Amiga product and rebrand it? Which product? And you would again pay more for re-brand?

Its not only a problem that "Community" is not single minded with the plan,
seems neither CUSA is.

The magic question is "what product is"

At the other hand, don`t mind that CUSA will NOT change its way on making its own Amiga line and advertising it.

Making community project secured by community is nothing to lose tactics, while you will not be able to object their main product line that meanwhile goes for advertising, while this project gets NDA. If 500 preorders fails, its the community "is wrong". As CUSA is company that neither designs hardware or software, what can we believe is that they can rebrand existing products as usual.

Short - many obstacles, little chances of success, win-win of CUSA

* * *

Without this:
Natami is closer then ever
MOS 3.x supports more Macs
AmigaOS 4 gets low end and high end hardware next year

Where would be place for new products?

Would it have any effect beside "healing relations wits CUSA"

Last edited by vox on 20-Dec-2011 at 06:28 PM.

_________________
Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
 Top | Parent

Replies
SubjectPosterDate
      Re: cusa propositionjkirk20-Dec-2011 18:31:42
          Re: cusa propositionvox20-Dec-2011 18:36:52
              Re: cusa propositionwawa20-Dec-2011 18:53:54
                  Re: cusa propositionvox20-Dec-2011 19:01:17
                      Re: cusa propositionwawa20-Dec-2011 19:01:44
                          Re: cusa propositionmatthey21-Dec-2011 0:51:37
                              Re: cusa propositionSamurai_Crow21-Dec-2011 2:25:06



[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle