Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
19 crawler(s) on-line.
 110 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 OlafS25:  16 mins ago
 amigakit:  23 mins ago
 CosmosUnivers:  58 mins ago
 pixie:  1 hr 3 mins ago
 kriz:  1 hr 3 mins ago
 Karlos:  1 hr 16 mins ago
 Musashi5150:  1 hr 29 mins ago
 Rassilon:  1 hr 31 mins ago
 Rob:  1 hr 43 mins ago
 Ratta:  1 hr 50 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga General Chat
      /  Unfair bounty?
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 )
PosterThread
Zardoz 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 17-Feb-2007 19:32:28
#101 ]
Team Member
Joined: 13-Mar-2003
Posts: 4261
From: Unknown

@Trezzer

Don't get me started on IE... Supporting IE7 is one thing, but IE6 forces me to drop PNGs and any alpha channel images. It also seems that pages that look fine on my IE6 machines look like crap on other IE6 machines which is pretty bizarre...

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Snuffy 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 17-Feb-2007 19:57:34
#102 ]
Super Member
Joined: 25-Oct-2005
Posts: 1121
From: Michigan, USA

@Trezzer

Put up or shut up! Send money; don't make cheap remarks.
I kind of like IE7. Amiga needs a better browser!

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Anonymous 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 17-Feb-2007 20:22:54
# ]

0
0

@Snuffy

IE7 may alright, but it only exists because of Firefox. Earlier IE versions only existed to kill Netscape, which is why in between, they just counted their money while web developers suffer (and still suffer) their crappy bug-ridden non-compliant browser.

There was a nice comment in the Haiku presentation at Google from Jean Louis Gassee where he said that if a certain company had their way, we'd still be using text displays.

To me, it's the clearest example or what a monopoly is and why it's bad for technology, and I can't believe that so many people in IT (usually MS sys admins) can't see that!

Chris

Last edited by clebin on 17-Feb-2007 at 08:23 PM.
Last edited by clebin on 17-Feb-2007 at 08:23 PM.

 
     Report this post  
BrandonLee 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 17-Feb-2007 23:47:42
#104 ]
Super Member
Joined: 15-Dec-2003
Posts: 1355
From: Lisbon, Portugal

@RWO

The ideal, IMHO, would be something related to IBrowse. Not sure if there's anything to be done here, but speeding up development would be a godsend.

Having said that, there's always something unpredictable about bounties. Can't remember clearly, but wasn't there some bounty aimed supposedly at OS4 and MOS that only managed the MOS part? Read it somewhere, not sure about details.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
jahc 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 8:10:13
#105 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-May-2003
Posts: 2959
From: Auckland, New Zealand

@Marcik

can you comment on Hattys message..

"Marcik is NOT going to do an OS4 port of Sputnik, so forget it. Sputnik will be an official component of MOS 1.5 once released."

....?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
fairlanefastback 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 8:30:17
#106 ]
Team Member
Joined: 22-Jun-2005
Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA

@jahc

Marcik already said in this thread:

Quote:
But some of you want me to support OS4 and it's my offer.


Forgive me for saying this. I haven't been on these boards all too long really. But I swear it seems like so many things that go on are filled with needless bloody intrigue!

The man has named his terms for working on the project. It seems like the only way he will "NOT" do the port as hatty claims I think is if enough money is not raised OR perhaps if we tire Marcik out before he has even ever started.

I think it would be a lot more useful for hatty to explain himself rather than ask Marcik, being that Marcik already has been pretty clear that he will do the work, if the community can reach his financial terms within 8 months.





_________________
Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0
Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS)
EFIKA owner
Amiga 1200

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Troels 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 9:26:40
#107 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 8-Mar-2003
Posts: 2005
From: Unknown

@jahc

Marcin and I have discussed this bounty for a long time, he might not be very interested in OS4 but he is willing to do the port.
I have no idea if Sputnik will be a part of MOS 1.5 but I don't have a problem if is.

IMHO Hatty is just spreading FUD, the least he could do is back up such claims.

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
marcik 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 11:28:14
#108 ]
Member
Joined: 27-Aug-2004
Posts: 35
From: Unknown

@jahc

As Troles said - FUD. It realy makes me wonder why some OS4 'supporters' are trying to do everything to discourage to work on OS4 version...

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
jahc 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 12:35:01
#109 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 30-May-2003
Posts: 2959
From: Auckland, New Zealand

@marcik

Quote:
As Troles said - FUD. It realy makes me wonder why some OS4 'supporters' are trying to do everything to discourage to work on OS4 version...

Okay, thanks for FUD busting. :)

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
MoonSire 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 13:27:00
#110 ]
Member
Joined: 20-Mar-2005
Posts: 92
From: Behind the Moon

@marcik

I have donated ¤20 at it will probably be more before the 8 months have passed. Thank you for agreeing to this!

@Troels
Very nice work!

_________________
www.EtherealWorld.com

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
sicky 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 13:44:54
#111 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 11-Mar-2003
Posts: 2843
From: Essex, UK

@clebin

Quote:
IE7 may alright, but it only exists because of Firefox. Earlier IE versions only existed to kill Netscape, which is why in between, they just counted their money while web developers suffer (and still suffer) their crappy bug-ridden non-compliant browser.

Couldn't have put it better myself!

My favourite browsers are for Amiga OS IBrowse 2.4 and for Mac OSX I use OmniWeb 5.5.4 (which cost me £8) and on the PC I use Firefox, you wouldn't catch me using IE in any flavour any any machine!

Last edited by sicky on 18-Feb-2007 at 03:16 PM.

_________________
SAM 460 with 2GB or RAM, 1000GB HD, 4 port SATA, DVDRW drive and Radeon HD 4650 GFX card.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
fryguy 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 14:28:36
#112 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 6-Dec-2003
Posts: 852
From: Tinytown

What AmigaOS needs is a CSS-capable web browser so i hope as many as possible donate to this bounty.


 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tomas 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 14:57:15
#113 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 25-Jul-2003
Posts: 4286
From: Unknown

@Snuffy

Quote:

Snuffy wrote:
@Trezzer

Put up or shut up! Send money; don't make cheap remarks.
I kind of like IE7. Amiga needs a better browser!

It is definitely better than IE6.. But it is still not following the web standards and most of the stuff that made it better than IE6 has just been copied and pasted from other browsers like firefox.
If it was not for firefox and opera, then you would still be stuck with IE6. The only reason IE7 was made was because the competition made IE6 look really bad.

Last edited by Tomas on 18-Feb-2007 at 02:58 PM.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Moxee 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 18-Feb-2007 20:08:07
#114 ]
Team Member
Joined: 20-Aug-2003
Posts: 6291
From: County Yakima, WA State, USA

@Troels

Quote:

IMHO Hatty is just spreading FUD


Not to mention his failure to comprehend what marcik has said in this thread.

Last edited by Moxee on 18-Feb-2007 at 08:52 PM.

_________________
Moxee
AmigaOne X1000
AmigaOne XE G4
I'd agree with you, but then we'd both be wrong.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
AmigaPapst 
Re: Unfair bounty?
Posted on 20-Feb-2007 12:15:46
#115 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 2-Nov-2003
Posts: 635
From: Amigavatikan

@Troels
I hope we will see a good browser for os4, but I have a uneasy feeling.

_________________
AmigaOne X1000 1,8 Ghz/2 GB Ram + Radeon 6670 2 GB + AmigaOS4.1
A4000T CyberstormPPC 604e-200Mhz/060/128MB+CybervisionPPC 8MB + AmigaOS4
and anymore other Amigas...

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle