Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
5647 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)



Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Your support is needed and is appreciated as is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.

Main sections
OS4 Zone
IRC Network
AmigaWorld Radio
Top Members
Amiga Dealers
About Us
Terms of Service

IRC Channel
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

(Uses JAVA Applet and Port 1024)
Visit the Chatroom Website

Who's Online
 55 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 Barret:  18 mins ago
 retro:  27 mins ago
 fishy_fis:  1 hr 4 mins ago
 Jasper:  2 hrs 4 mins ago
 Yssing:  2 hrs 4 mins ago
 PhantomInterrogative:  2 hrs 16 mins ago
 busytech:  3 hrs 11 mins ago
 daveyw:  3 hrs 55 mins ago
 A1200:  4 hrs 32 mins ago
 Tuxedo:  4 hrs 39 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Classic Amiga Software
      /  Benchmarks of 68k (UAE, real hardware)
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )
Re: Benchmarks of 68k (UAE, real hardware)
Posted on 8-May-2015 9:37:40
#21 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 8-Aug-2005
Posts: 438
From: Germany (Black Forest)


But what is done here?

Different hardware was compared - OK this is nice
But also different tools / version/ tunings / with SIMD /without - were used.

We know that different LAME versions have different performance.
We know that different compile flags give significant different performance .
We know that with/without SIMD gives like 100% difference.

So what value have these results under these conditions?
One LAME binary could be 3 times faster than another used one.

APOLLO the new 68K :

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Re: Benchmarks of 68k (UAE, real hardware)
Posted on 8-May-2015 10:06:21
#22 ]
Super Member
Joined: 19-Aug-2006
Posts: 1373
From: Italia


i know.
the best things to do is the same benchmark for alls.
the problem is that OS4, MOS & AROS software has different optimization.

Maybe the best test should be linux.
Sam460, X1000, X86, Sam440, AmigaOne with the same version of linux (or at least similar version or similar features) with the same version of software to test

Blender is another ambigous test becuase OS4 has old version, MOS has more modern and optimized version and no port for AROS-.

Linux could have a further importance: 3D acceleration via Gallium.
With linux you could compare 3D with OS4/MOS/AROS 3D.
Gallium vs TinyGL / Gallium vs Warp3D-MiniGL

Sam440ep-Flex is 800 Mhz
Sam460ex is 1150 Mhz
X1000 is 1800 Mhz
AmigaOne is 800/933/1000 Mhz
Pegasos 2 is 1000 Mhz
X86 best use old system with 800/900 and 1000 Mhz

in the past i tried to convince to partecipate, but without success..

Last edited by Seiya on 08-May-2015 at 10:08 AM.


 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 )

[ home ][ about us ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright 2000 - 2017 was originally founded by David Doyle