Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6071 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
6 crawler(s) on-line.
 174 guest(s) on-line.
 0 member(s) on-line.



You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 Musashi5150:  6 mins ago
 CosmosUnivers:  8 mins ago
 jPV:  8 mins ago
 AmiKit:  9 mins ago
 matthey:  11 mins ago
 Karlos:  15 mins ago
 Hypex:  27 mins ago
 OldFart:  37 mins ago
 Vidar:  45 mins ago
 kolla:  45 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga PPC Linux
      /  PowerPC Benchmark with Linux or AmigaOS (and amigaos like)
Register To Post

Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 Next Page )
PosterThread
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 17:03:47
#41 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Seiya

yes you are right
expecially when the kernel was not designed for the host cpu and mainboard and was full of missing instructions and signals in beginning

Last edited by tlosm on 30-Mar-2016 at 05:05 PM.
Last edited by tlosm on 30-Mar-2016 at 05:05 PM.
Last edited by tlosm on 30-Mar-2016 at 05:04 PM.

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Seiya 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 18:23:11
#42 ]
Super Member
Joined: 19-Aug-2006
Posts: 1474
From: Italia

@tlosm

what release of kernel you are running?

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rose 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 18:34:23
#43 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 5-Nov-2009
Posts: 982
From: Unknown

@Seiya

P5020 has been supported in mainstream kernels since 3.3 (March 2012). Dunno if there is some weirdness in motherboard that it needs special patches for kernel.

Unless in this case beta means that someone had to do dark voodoo of config and compiling kernel which hardly counts as beta when you use stable components.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 18:35:14
#44 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Seiya

what means release kernel? if you need a freescale patch for running it?
im running 4.6.0 rc 1 with freescale patch for 4.4

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 18:40:03
#45 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Rose

right words

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Spectre660 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 18:51:40
#46 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 5-Jun-2005
Posts: 3918
From: Unknown

@tlosm

Actually there are no special patches for the Linux kernel for X5000 from kernel 4.4.4 .
Thanks to the initiative of Alex Perez .

_________________
Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Kicko 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 19:12:33
#47 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 19-Jun-2004
Posts: 5009
From: Sweden

I heard also x5000 boots faster then x1000 using ssd harddrive. Uboot vs CFE.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 22:09:04
#48 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Spectre660

yes thanks to Alex and now Darren look like is try to he help him too

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Tuxedo 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 30-Mar-2016 22:24:42
#49 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2003
Posts: 2341
From: Perugia, ITALY

@tlosm

sorry but dont understand...
The kernel was beta or no? From Rose words seems taht wasnt so much beta in kernel regarding cpu usage...

_________________
Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
klx300r 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 0:30:11
#50 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 4-Mar-2008
Posts: 3837
From: Toronto, Canada

Quote:

Rose wrote:
@klx300r

Quote:
ok so let's do like the other threads over at amigans and here and stick with the same version of Blender on OS4.1FE and agree on a standard scene to render.


Since this is supposed to be about Linux performance there really isn't reason to use anything older than 2.7x.

And for scene BMW27.blend is pretty much standard for benchmarking 2.7x.


ah ok, then I'll start a new thread for OS4.1FE machines running our version of blender with the scene you noted.

_________________
____________________________
c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII
! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 !
mancave-ramblings
X1000 I BELIEVE

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 6:11:28
#51 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Tuxedo
linux kernel was support it yes 5020
how? was running and running dont mean good
thanks to cyrus and alex job now better.
need to be better fixed yes
alex is continue working on it yes.
cyrus is a new hardware yes

what it means if cpu is linux compatible? dont mean it is full supported by linux os/distro
example probably Rose know why Debian is performances slower compared Ubuntus
with the same kernel on the same machine (about 40%)

my last reply to rose was a little kidding ...

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 7:53:43
#52 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Kicko

I cant compare because i dont have an X1000.
on Linux right now on my SSD840 the speed is only 180 mb/s on an Ex4 this on the internal sata. better driver need there too... time by time
note before was much less.
On G5 quad with SSD intel 320 i have 140 mb/s

Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 07:55 AM.
Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 07:54 AM.

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rose 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 12:25:40
#53 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 5-Nov-2009
Posts: 982
From: Unknown

@tlosm

Quote:

what it means if cpu is linux compatible? dont mean it is full supported by linux os/distro
example probably Rose know why Debian is performances slower compared Ubuntus
with the same kernel on the same machine (about 40%)

my last reply to rose was a little kidding ...


So nothing to do with kernel being beta. Debian is more about stability than performance so it has some ancient packages on it. Is that 40% all across the board or just some programs?

Quote:

on Linux right now on my SSD840 the speed is only 180 mb/s on an Ex4 this on the internal sata. better driver need there too... time by time
note before was much less.


That's actually not too bad result considering hardware. Any driver upgrade wont magically make your internal Sata SATA-3.



 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 18:46:13
#54 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Rose

the Sata is SATA 3

and for sure you in your Wintel knowledge you know what this menans ... and where is not been used in Debian or some other distos

: -mcpu=e5500 -mno-altivec -mtune=e5500

Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 06:52 PM.
Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 06:51 PM.
Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 06:48 PM.

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rob 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 19:06:20
#55 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 20-Mar-2003
Posts: 6351
From: S.Wales

@tlosm

Quote:
the Sata is SATA 3


The P5020 specification says SATA 2.0.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 19:32:14
#56 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Rob

yes sorry i was confusing is a sata2
Sata3 is my ssd
in any way is not the sata the 40% less performance less in debian but the line i had been write
and ubuntu is better but not is optimized too

Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 07:34 PM.
Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 07:34 PM.
Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 07:32 PM.

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rose 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 20:52:23
#57 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 5-Nov-2009
Posts: 982
From: Unknown

@tlosm

Quote:
the Sata is SATA 3


Sata is definetly SATA-2 unless you are claiming that Cyrus has custom special version of P5020.

Quote:
and for sure you in your Wintel knowledge you know what this menans


Don't know what Wintel (Windows+Intel) has to do with this.

Quote:
... and where is not been used in Debian or some other distos

: -mcpu=e5500 -mno-altivec -mtune=e5500


Distros even for x86/x86_64 are compiled with quite generic compiler options. Gentoo tried to hit this niche "To get most out of hardware" but it kinda fizzled when people noticed that you would have to be really lucky to get even 5% performance gains from that outside of few special cases in spesific programs.


 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 21:57:56
#58 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Rose

yes frizzed ... expecially when now i can play 720p without the frame drops of this video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEjOgpesYuo

Or bacause im going the double of perfomance of this
https://youtu.be/qdOLLVk6I1A?t=1m28s

...PS: rose you can stay in your convinction like your usual me will stay in mine

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rose 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 22:48:36
#59 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 5-Nov-2009
Posts: 982
From: Unknown

@tlosm

So X5000 needs it's special snowflake distribution. Which makes it pretty much unbuyable for people outside OS4 crowds.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
tlosm 
Re: X5000 vs X1000
Posted on 31-Mar-2016 23:09:21
#60 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 28-Jul-2012
Posts: 2746
From: Amiga land

@Rose

you write exactly like some other one ... that vanish from here ...

no works well with mate , work with debian but like i write before need optimization in building
do you thing this is unusable? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdOLLVk6I1A

Ps: Linux Debian PPC FULL 64 bit is coming optimized for e5500 too Lib64 is right now on my machine installed (who use linux ppc will understand my words ..)

Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 11:13 PM.
Last edited by tlosm on 31-Mar-2016 at 11:10 PM.

_________________
I love Amiga and new hope by AmigaNG
A 500 + ; CDTV; CD32;
PowerMac G5 Quad 8GB,SSD,SSHD,7800gtx,Radeon R5 230 2GB;
MacBook Pro Retina I7 2.3ghz;
#nomorea-eoninmyhome

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 Next Page )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle