| Poster | Thread |
 Jax
|  |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 11-May-2018 2:31:19
| | [ #81 ] |
|
|
 |
Member
 |
Joined: 10-May-2018
Posts: 19
From: Czech Republic | | |
|
| @pavlor
Quote:
| Tabor looks FAAAAAAAST in comparison to speed of PowerPC emulation in WinUAE. My 350 EUR notebook reaches less than 300 MHz G3 performance (and there is no compositing, no 3D and slow 2D GFX and disk access). The day the Tabor is released, I will buy one. |
The expected price of 400€ looks good. And as the X1000 and X5000 boards showed, waiting for audio and Ethernet drivers may take a long time. I did not want to wait for Tabor, so I bought Pegasos II. Besides Warp3D Nova and RadeonHD have everything. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
Signal
| |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 11-May-2018 14:08:35
| | [ #82 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member
 |
Joined: 1-Jun-2013
Posts: 664
From: USA | | |
|
| @arthoropod
Quote:
arthoropod wrote:
@Signal
Actually, I know someone who has one.
What I'm curious about is how well the system supports big endian code.
And, can it support running both big endian and little endian code simultaneously (possibly on different cores)?
|
Link_of _interest.
 _________________
Tinkering with computers. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
arthoropod
| |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 11-May-2018 15:39:47
| | [ #83 ] |
|
|
 |
Member
|
Joined: 14-Feb-2018
Posts: 80
From: Gotham | | |
|
| @Signal
Quote:
Ain't that pretty?
From what I understand, the hypervisor could enable sessions that are either big or little endian (simultaneously).
|
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
g01df1sh
| |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 11-May-2018 19:32:11
| | [ #84 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member
 |
Joined: 16-Apr-2009
Posts: 1777
From: UK | | |
|
| Release date
2 more weeks
2 more months
2 more years
2 more centuries
Can we have some news this is getting a joke now. _________________
A1200 ACA1232 128MB Indivison MkIICr
Elbox empty Power Tower
RPi3 Emulating C64 ZX Atari PS BBC
Wii with Amiga emulation
Vampire v4 SA |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
arthoropod
| |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 12-May-2018 5:46:16
| | [ #85 ] |
|
|
|
Member
|
Joined: 14-Feb-2018
Posts: 80
From: Gotham | | |
|
| @g01df1sh
Quote:
| Can we have some news this is getting a joke now. |
You really do have the attention span of a goldfish, don't you?
If you'd checked out the link you would have noticed that it pictured a board that has been shipped to a user, as in they exist.
Which, compared to Tabor, is an accomplishment. |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
K-L
| |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 12-May-2018 7:03:33
| | [ #86 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member
|
Joined: 3-Mar-2006
Posts: 1411
From: Oullins, France | | |
|
| @arthoropod
Actually, g01df1sh was talking about the Tabor, forgetting he was in the Talos's thread. _________________
PowerMac G5 2,7Ghz - 2GB - Radeon 9650 - MorphOS 3.14
AmigaONE X1000, 2GB, Sapphire Radeon HD 7700
FPGA Replay + DB 68060 at 85Mhz |
|
| Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaBlitter
| |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 14-May-2018 7:09:48
| | [ #87 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member
 |
Joined: 26-Sep-2005
Posts: 3513
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaBlitter
| |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 17-May-2018 11:08:51
| | [ #88 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 26-Sep-2005
Posts: 3513
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaBlitter
| |
Re: Why not port OS4 to this
Posted on 17-May-2018 11:49:23
| | [ #89 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member
|
Joined: 26-Sep-2005
Posts: 3513
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
| Status: Offline |
|
|
12 crawler(s) on-line.
146 guest(s) on-line.
1 member(s) on-line.
