Poster | Thread |
fairlanefastback
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 17:17:22
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| @K-L
Quote:
K-L wrote: @fairlanefastback
Joerg is working activey on OWB, Marçik on Sputnik. And you want FireFox or other browser to be ported to our systems.
I prefer supporting our developpers (even Ibrowse is still being developped as far as I understand).
Let's not waste our time trying to get things we have already and which need only improvements.
Or DO it |
Most certainly I want to support the current developers. I've given to the bounty for Sputnik on OS4 (without owning OS4) and bought MOS 2.0 which includes Sputnik for MOS. So I have been supporting the developers. It would be nice to have a second browser though. And perhaps us having an open source one could help, especially with some feature sets that are currently missing, like this from the Sputnik page:
Quote:
Q: Will be the Shockwave Flash supported? A: It will if someone creates a plug-in (plug-in API is a part of KTHML, but it has low priotity on my todo list). |
I'm not at all opposed to Sputnik and Origyn being the two choices on each Amiga-like OS. I know at least Sputnik has plans to go to AOS 4.0, not sure if Origyn is ever destined to MOS though.
Certainly I'm not for mucking up anything here. Not being a programmer perhaps I am over-weighing how open source could possibly help. Conversely though I think having a browser like Firefox could win us new users. Asus being able to say that Eee PC runs Firefox certainly gives an air of familiarity to potential customers.Last edited by fairlanefastback on 10-Jul-2008 at 05:18 PM.
_________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
K-L
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:14:24
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 3-Mar-2006 Posts: 1413
From: Oullins, France | | |
|
| @fairlanefastback
About Sputnik: I don't even think Sputnik will evar land on AmigaOS 4 since Marçik doesn't really want to make it.
As said befor, I prefer that Marçik works full time on Sputnik for MorphOS 2 than trying to get it working on Amiga OS 4 (and slowing donw the MOS version).
For OWB, anyone is free to port it to MorphOS 2
But seriously, let's not reinvent the wheel constantly, there are so many other things to do instead of making things that have already be done. _________________ PowerMac G5 2,7Ghz - 2GB - Radeon 9650 - MorphOS 3.14 AmigaONE X1000, 2GB, Sapphire Radeon HD 7700 FPGA Replay + DB 68060 at 85Mhz |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Troels
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:15:07
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 2005
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @tomazkid
Sputnik for OS4 is in the works [EDIT] (it is currently in development, but no release date yet). Last edited by Troels on 10-Jul-2008 at 06:19 PM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:21:22
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @K-L
Quote:
About Sputnik: I don't even think Sputnik will evar land on AmigaOS 4 since Marçik doesn't really want to make it. |
He has é3000 reason to do it _________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:23:23
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @Troels
Quote:
Troels wrote: @tomazkid
Sputnik for OS4 is in the works [EDIT] (it is currently in development, but no release date yet). |
Good OWB is a good effort, but somehow Sputnik feels like a more OS-native of those two._________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kicko
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:32:57
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 19-Jun-2004 Posts: 5009
From: Sweden | | |
|
| I think its enough with sputnik and owb for browsers. better do other stuff like plugins, other software we need etc. We should be happy there is these 2 browsers. You greedy..... ;)
Last edited by Kicko on 10-Jul-2008 at 06:33 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fairlanefastback
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:35:14
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| @Kicko
Quote:
Kicko wrote: I think its enough with sputnik and owb for browsers. better do other stuff like plugins, other software we need etc. We should be happy there is these 2 browsers. You greedy..... ;)
|
Well there is no OWB for MOS. So really I have one browser. _________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:38:01
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @fairlanefastback
IBrowse does not work on MOS 2? _________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fairlanefastback
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:53:20
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| @tomazkid
Quote:
tomazkid wrote: @fairlanefastback
IBrowse does not work on MOS 2? |
I'm referring to modern browsers. To by understanding and previous usage of Ibrowse (not on MOS) it has many webpage rendering issues. Perhaps my understanding of it to be a legacy web browser is off, but thats how it has felt when I have used it in the past._________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kicko
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 18:57:13
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 19-Jun-2004 Posts: 5009
From: Sweden | | |
|
| Isnt Sputnik good ? Or shall i say better then all browsers on amiga together ?
There is always linux you can install and run firefox. :) Last edited by Kicko on 10-Jul-2008 at 06:57 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fairlanefastback
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 19:19:46
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 22-Jun-2005 Posts: 4886
From: MA, USA | | |
|
| @Kicko
Quote:
Kicko wrote: Isnt Sputnik good ? Or shall i say better then all browsers on amiga together ?
There is always linux you can install and run firefox. :) |
Yes its good. But what happens if Marcik decides to quite developing it at some point. Whats wrong with wanting a second modern web browser on an OS? _________________ Pegasos2 G3 running AOS 4.1 and MorphOS 2.0 Amikit user, tinkering with Icaros VM (AROS) EFIKA owner Amiga 1200 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kicko
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 10-Jul-2008 19:33:34
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 19-Jun-2004 Posts: 5009
From: Sweden | | |
|
| @fairlanefastback
Whats wrong is these things do take alot of time and you know how many developers we have left and how many wants to use their sparetime for stuff like this. History tells itself. See how long it takes for ibrowse to release new versions. Aweb is not much happening there either.
Enjoy what you have now :D
If Marcik decides to stop development maybe he releases it opensource and someother people continues. If not maybe Joerg decides to make a port to MOS if we/you raise some money like Sputnik. But who knows what the future gives us. Maybe AmigaInc pays developers to make firefox (and im king of Sweden) :D Last edited by Kicko on 10-Jul-2008 at 07:36 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
CygnusEd
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 12-Jul-2008 22:14:45
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 7-Feb-2004 Posts: 393
From: germany | | |
|
| @fairlanefastback
Quote:
http://www.netsurf-browser.org/NetSurf is a web browser for RISC OS and UNIX-like platforms including Linux and an early port for BeOS has been completed. |
Had a look at this program and it sounds very interesting. I've made a quick port using my (buggy) DirectFB/Cygnix port. NetSurf is really very portable and it compiled without any change (Congratulation to the NetSurf team!).
Here is a screenshot:
It works nice, but there are not much advantages compared to owb. And the biggest disadvantage: It has no javascript
_________________ X-5000 PPC 5020/2 GHZ, Fractal Define XL R2-Tower, OS 4.1 final update 2, 4 GB, Radeon HD 7770, ESI Juli@ XTe SAM 460ex/1,15 GHZ, OS 4.1 final, 2 GB, Radeon HD 6450 Amiga 4000D/040 25 Mhz, OS 3.9 BB2, 272 MB, X-Surf, 250 MB ZIP |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
NutsAboutAmiga
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 12-Jul-2008 22:23:56
| | [ #21 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 9-Jun-2004 Posts: 12835
From: Norway | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
DBAlex
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 12-Jul-2008 23:44:30
| | [ #22 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 23-Jul-2006 Posts: 756
From: UK | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
arnljot
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 12-Jul-2008 23:50:11
| | [ #23 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2007 Posts: 163
From: Oslo | | |
|
| @CygnusEd
That's really impressive.
How is the memory footprint over OWB?
_________________ A posting a day keeps the sanity away... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 13-Jul-2008 1:54:05
| | [ #24 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @CygnusEd
It can handle css and such though?
_________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
samo79
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 13-Jul-2008 3:03:46
| | [ #25 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 13-Feb-2003 Posts: 3505
From: Italy, Perugia | | |
|
| WOW, looking forward for the release
_________________ BACK FOR THE FUTURE
http://www.betatesting.it/backforthefuture
Sam440ep Flex 800 Mhz 1 GB Ram + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6 AmigaOne XE G3 800 Mhz - 640 MB Ram - Radeon 9200 SE + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chris_Y
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 13-Jul-2008 10:28:42
| | [ #26 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 21-Jun-2003 Posts: 3205
From: Beds, UK | | |
|
| @arnljot
Quote:
How is the memory footprint over OWB? |
It runs (on RISC OS at least) in 16MB. OWB needs 256MB (and ideally 512MB).
It should also be faster and has some menu items for bookmarks and the like.
It's a nice little browser from what I've seen of it (running slowly under emulation and with no network connection)
Hopefully the GTK code can be easily replaced with AmigaOS code, to make the GUI properly native.
No JavaScript could be a major issue for some sites though.
_________________ "Miracles we do at once, the impossible takes a little longer" - AJS on Hyperion Avatar is Tabitha by Eric W Schwartz |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
voyager2007
| |
Re: Could this Open Source Web Browser be easily ported for our needs? Posted on 13-Jul-2008 14:48:50
| | [ #27 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 5-Sep-2007 Posts: 432
From: Germany | | |
|
| @Chris_Y
There's plenty of open-source JavaScript implementations that can be added to the browser. It's open source, after all!
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|