Poster | Thread |
nikosidis
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 17:23:22
| | [ #61 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Dec-2008 Posts: 995
From: Norway, Oslo | | |
|
| @Seiya
Not realy. It is good to see that at least AROS is as fast as other Operative systems with similar hardware.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Fab
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 17:36:36
| | [ #62 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 17-Mar-2004 Posts: 1178
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @nikosidis
Well, there's really no reason it wouldn't be as fast as other browsers using the same engine on this very computational area, as long as JIT is enabled (which is only available for X86 and ARM). JavascriptCore is relatively fast, quite faster than FireFox in any case. Chrome's V8 should be a bit faster, though. But remember these javascript-centric tests don't necessarily reflect the speed of the browser in general. Gfx subsystem and hwacceleration (or lack of) is very important in this regard too. That's why peacekeeper test is a bit more interesting, imo.
By the way, WebKit actually got a nice substancial speedup again in javascript in the last month, but it also requires x86 or arm to make use of it. Last edited by Fab on 01-Apr-2012 at 05:40 PM. Last edited by Fab on 01-Apr-2012 at 05:39 PM. Last edited by Fab on 01-Apr-2012 at 05:37 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
nikosidis
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 18:16:05
| | [ #63 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Dec-2008 Posts: 995
From: Norway, Oslo | | |
|
| @Fab
Yes, sure are other things that matter too.
With peacekeeper (html 5 tester) I got Score 725
Sure no video player is working in AROS version yet.
Other please try too:
http://peacekeeper.futuremark.com/
Last edited by nikosidis on 01-Apr-2012 at 06:20 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tommysammy
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 18:35:01
| | [ #64 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 20-Jan-2010 Posts: 662
From: Isselburg,Germany | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 19:21:19
| | [ #65 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1474
From: Italia | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 19:24:38
| | [ #66 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9597
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Seiya
X1000 also uses DDR2 and its result is not that strange. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 21:05:14
| | [ #67 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1474
From: Italia | | |
|
| @pavlor
yes, but Sam460ex has an embedded cpu (the core is 440ep) maybe DDR2 are not so fast on Sam460ex. (DDR2 on Sam460ex are 533 or 667 Mhz?)
@all
my test. AROS Machine Sunspider 0.9.1 Intel Core2Duo E8500, Asus P5Q, 4 GB DDR2 800 Super Talent --------------------------------- 2986,2ms +/- 30,7% ---------------------------------
V8 Benchmark Suit - version 7
Javascript crash
---------------------------------
PeaceKeeper
javaascript crash after 1 minute of test :( Last edited by Seiya on 01-Apr-2012 at 09:06 PM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
nikosidis
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 21:11:22
| | [ #68 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Dec-2008 Posts: 995
From: Norway, Oslo | | |
|
| @Seiya
For AROS users, w8 for next odyssey version before testing.
I took the sunspider test on my ACER aspire one D255. Win. XP and latest chrome
Total: 1704,3 ms
Same test with ACER aspire one A110 with AspireOS and odyssey
Total: 1092.8 ms
Considering that D255 should be little faster than D110 AROS kills Windows XP :D
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
WOSPUPOS4
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 22:17:05
| | [ #69 ] |
|
|
|
Regular Member |
Joined: 24-Feb-2006 Posts: 220
From: Unknown | | |
|
| ============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 238.4ms +/- 0.7% --------------------------------------------
on a 3 year old pc.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 23:01:51
| | [ #70 ] |
|
|
|
Team Member |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| Iceweasel / Debian on my good old EeePC
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 4824.4ms +/- 9.4%
_________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 1-Apr-2012 23:23:15
| | [ #71 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1474
From: Italia | | |
|
| here my better result
Intel Core2Duo E8500, Asus P5Q, 4 GB DDR2 800 Super Talent, nVidia GTS 250
AROS: Icaros Dekstop 1.4 Browser: Odyssey
Sunspider 0.9.1 --------------------------------- 2986,2ms +/- 30,7% ---------------------------------
other test, javascript crash
Windows XP X64
FireFox 11.0 32bit Sunspider 0.9.1 ------------------------------- 225,6ms +/- 0,7% -------------------------------
Chrome 18.0.1025.142
Sunspider 0.9.1 -------------------------------- 242,0ms +/- 1,1% --------------------------------
V8 Benchmark Suite - version 7 on FireFox 11 32bit -------------------------------- Score: 7235
Richards: 9101 DeltaBlue: 10870 Crypto: 15278 RayTrace 3189 EarleyBoyer: 7554 RegExp: 1373 Splay: 10976 NavierStokes: 13678 -----------------------------------
V8 Benchmark Suite - version 7 on Chrome 18.0 --------------------------------- Score: 8997
Richards: 9051 DeltaBlue: 17316 Crypto: 17656 RayTrace: 13414 EarleyBoyer: 25607 RegExp: 2670 Splay: 4531 NavierStokes: 3734 ------------------------------
PeaceKeeper on Firefox 11.0 ------------------------------------ 1809 html5 capabilities: 6/7 ---------------------------------------
PeaceKeeper on Chrome 18.0 ----------------------------------------- 3619 html capabilities: 6/7
Last edited by Seiya on 01-Apr-2012 at 11:36 PM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
asymetrix
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 0:00:39
| | [ #72 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Mar-2003 Posts: 868
From: United Kingdom | | |
|
| @thread here are my results
SunSpider 0.9.1 JavaScript Benchmark Results Content Version: sunspider-0.9.1
DELL XPS 17, 8GB 1333MHz DDR3 Dual Channel, i7 Quad Core 2.2-3.1GHZ 2670QM GeForce GT 550M, 3GB Windows 7, SP1, 64bit
Chrome
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 383.7ms +/- 5.4% --------------------------------------------
3d: 58.2ms +/- 9.0% cube: 17.8ms +/- 18.4% morph: 14.3ms +/- 12.7% raytrace: 26.1ms +/- 12.2%
access: 30.8ms +/- 9.1% binary-trees: 2.5ms +/- 24.3% fannkuch: 12.3ms +/- 8.2% nbody: 10.3ms +/- 17.6% nsieve: 5.7ms +/- 15.7%
bitops: 43.4ms +/- 4.4% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 4.7ms +/- 7.3% bits-in-byte: 8.8ms +/- 3.4% bitwise-and: 16.7ms +/- 11.4% nsieve-bits: 13.2ms +/- 11.6%
controlflow: 4.7ms +/- 19.0% recursive: 4.7ms +/- 19.0%
crypto: 33.7ms +/- 8.7% aes: 14.2ms +/- 11.8% md5: 9.3ms +/- 17.4% sha1: 10.2ms +/- 8.0%
date: 41.3ms +/- 16.3% format-tofte: 18.2ms +/- 19.6% format-xparb: 23.1ms +/- 24.0%
math: 27.2ms +/- 5.2% cordic: 6.5ms +/- 15.8% partial-sums: 13.5ms +/- 6.2% spectral-norm: 7.2ms +/- 13.9%
regexp: 11.7ms +/- 13.8% dna: 11.7ms +/- 13.8%
string: 132.7ms +/- 8.0% base64: 8.5ms +/- 15.5% fasta: 18.6ms +/- 14.5% tagcloud: 32.5ms +/- 14.6% unpack-code: 48.3ms +/- 14.1% validate-input: 24.8ms +/- 17.1%
ACER TravelMate 5720, Intel Core2Duo T7100, 1.8GHZ 2GB RAM, Vista, SP1, 32bit
FireFox 11
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 922.8ms +/- 1.1% --------------------------------------------
3d: 151.8ms +/- 3.1% cube: 57.1ms +/- 2.2% morph: 39.6ms +/- 7.4% raytrace: 55.1ms +/- 2.1%
access: 72.4ms +/- 1.7% binary-trees: 10.4ms +/- 6.6% fannkuch: 27.6ms +/- 1.8% nbody: 20.9ms +/- 1.1% nsieve: 13.5ms +/- 4.5%
bitops: 43.6ms +/- 1.4% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 2.9ms +/- 7.8% bits-in-byte: 16.2ms +/- 1.9% bitwise-and: 11.4ms +/- 3.2% nsieve-bits: 13.1ms +/- 1.7%
controlflow: 9.6ms +/- 9.4% recursive: 9.6ms +/- 9.4%
crypto: 74.1ms +/- 1.2% aes: 38.5ms +/- 1.6% md5: 22.1ms +/- 1.0% sha1: 13.5ms +/- 2.8%
date: 135.0ms +/- 1.9% format-tofte: 71.2ms +/- 1.9% format-xparb: 63.8ms +/- 2.0%
math: 97.2ms +/- 5.8% cordic: 12.0ms +/- 2.8% partial-sums: 71.6ms +/- 7.3% spectral-norm: 13.6ms +/- 6.2%
regexp: 52.9ms +/- 2.2% dna: 52.9ms +/- 2.2%
string: 286.2ms +/- 0.7% base64: 21.7ms +/- 1.6% fasta: 30.0ms +/- 1.9% tagcloud: 89.7ms +/- 1.1% unpack-code: 108.6ms +/- 0.8% validate-input: 36.2ms +/- 1.6%
Internet Explorer 8.0
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 14710.2ms +/- 0.2% --------------------------------------------
3d: 1935.4ms +/- 0.5% cube: 577.8ms +/- 1.0% morph: 560.1ms +/- 0.6% raytrace: 797.5ms +/- 0.3%
access: 2594.0ms +/- 0.4% binary-trees: 518.5ms +/- 0.6% fannkuch: 1086.2ms +/- 0.5% nbody: 677.7ms +/- 0.5% nsieve: 311.6ms +/- 3.3%
bitops: 1942.5ms +/- 1.7% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 279.4ms +/- 3.2% bits-in-byte: 313.1ms +/- 6.9% bitwise-and: 892.0ms +/- 1.5% nsieve-bits: 458.0ms +/- 0.3%
controlflow: 400.5ms +/- 0.3% recursive: 400.5ms +/- 0.3%
crypto: 1183.2ms +/- 0.6% aes: 493.0ms +/- 0.3% md5: 355.5ms +/- 0.4% sha1: 334.7ms +/- 1.9%
date: 1392.8ms +/- 0.4% format-tofte: 723.4ms +/- 0.3% format-xparb: 669.4ms +/- 0.7%
math: 1632.7ms +/- 0.2% cordic: 663.2ms +/- 0.4% partial-sums: 521.2ms +/- 0.3% spectral-norm: 448.3ms +/- 0.3%
regexp: 637.0ms +/- 0.5% dna: 637.0ms +/- 0.5%
string: 2992.1ms +/- 0.2% base64: 512.3ms +/- 0.4% fasta: 806.8ms +/- 0.3% tagcloud: 535.8ms +/- 0.4% unpack-code: 589.8ms +/- 0.3% validate-input: 547.4ms +/- 0.5%
Rockmelt 0.16
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1047.8ms +/- 2.9% --------------------------------------------
3d: 159.9ms +/- 5.0% cube: 53.6ms +/- 13.1% morph: 39.7ms +/- 6.9% raytrace: 66.6ms +/- 6.6%
access: 103.2ms +/- 9.8% binary-trees: 7.4ms +/- 8.1% fannkuch: 40.2ms +/- 20.6% nbody: 37.1ms +/- 10.0% nsieve: 18.5ms +/- 17.5%
bitops: 113.4ms +/- 27.6% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 15.4ms +/- 29.1% bits-in-byte: 34.4ms +/- 83.7% bitwise-and: 33.3ms +/- 1.0% nsieve-bits: 30.3ms +/- 13.4%
controlflow: 13.0ms +/- 7.3% recursive: 13.0ms +/- 7.3%
crypto: 89.9ms +/- 11.2% aes: 32.0ms +/- 7.2% md5: 27.3ms +/- 25.0% sha1: 30.6ms +/- 16.7%
date: 111.1ms +/- 4.4% format-tofte: 48.2ms +/- 5.9% format-xparb: 62.9ms +/- 4.5%
math: 92.0ms +/- 9.0% cordic: 21.3ms +/- 46.5% partial-sums: 47.7ms +/- 4.0% spectral-norm: 23.0ms +/- 17.0%
regexp: 40.7ms +/- 3.6% dna: 40.7ms +/- 3.6%
string: 324.6ms +/- 2.2% base64: 19.9ms +/- 6.0% fasta: 52.1ms +/- 3.3% tagcloud: 82.4ms +/- 2.0% unpack-code: 119.0ms +/- 4.7% validate-input: 51.2ms +/- 3.0%
Maxthon 3
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1107.8ms +/- 6.1% --------------------------------------------
3d: 169.9ms +/- 12.7% cube: 65.9ms +/- 35.8% morph: 50.0ms +/- 9.3% raytrace: 54.0ms +/- 4.1%
access: 126.1ms +/- 38.0% binary-trees: 23.8ms +/- 144.8% fannkuch: 27.8ms +/- 3.2% nbody: 62.7ms +/- 66.6% nsieve: 11.8ms +/- 12.4%
bitops: 87.7ms +/- 3.6% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 7.1ms +/- 18.7% bits-in-byte: 18.0ms +/- 6.7% bitwise-and: 32.3ms +/- 1.1% nsieve-bits: 30.3ms +/- 7.0%
controlflow: 12.4ms +/- 6.2% recursive: 12.4ms +/- 6.2%
crypto: 90.9ms +/- 25.7% aes: 42.0ms +/- 60.3% md5: 28.9ms +/- 22.9% sha1: 20.0ms +/- 8.9%
date: 100.9ms +/- 2.6% format-tofte: 42.1ms +/- 6.4% format-xparb: 58.8ms +/- 3.2%
math: 98.8ms +/- 25.6% cordic: 13.1ms +/- 20.0% partial-sums: 65.6ms +/- 39.6% spectral-norm: 20.1ms +/- 7.6%
regexp: 33.0ms +/- 2.5% dna: 33.0ms +/- 2.5%
string: 388.1ms +/- 7.4% base64: 26.6ms +/- 50.9% fasta: 46.5ms +/- 5.1% tagcloud: 100.4ms +/- 25.1% unpack-code: 149.5ms +/- 11.9% validate-input: 65.1ms +/- 26.8%
ASUS Seashell EEE-PC, Intel Atom N550 DuelCore 1.5GHZ 1GB Memory, Windows 7, 32bit
Chrome 18.0
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1288.9ms +/- 1.6% --------------------------------------------
3d: 186.6ms +/- 8.5% cube: 69.2ms +/- 10.0% morph: 44.9ms +/- 15.2% raytrace: 72.5ms +/- 8.2%
access: 94.3ms +/- 9.9% binary-trees: 8.3ms +/- 5.8% fannkuch: 30.7ms +/- 6.2% nbody: 43.7ms +/- 20.5% nsieve: 11.6ms +/- 6.6%
bitops: 81.8ms +/- 1.8% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 7.0ms +/- 6.8% bits-in-byte: 14.5ms +/- 2.6% bitwise-and: 30.6ms +/- 5.1% nsieve-bits: 29.7ms +/- 1.6%
controlflow: 11.9ms +/- 4.4% recursive: 11.9ms +/- 4.4%
crypto: 110.3ms +/- 4.8% aes: 41.7ms +/- 10.2% md5: 45.9ms +/- 6.8% sha1: 22.7ms +/- 3.0%
date: 206.4ms +/- 4.8% format-tofte: 76.7ms +/- 7.1% format-xparb: 129.7ms +/- 4.4%
math: 98.5ms +/- 9.5% cordic: 26.4ms +/- 33.5% partial-sums: 46.1ms +/- 3.1% spectral-norm: 26.0ms +/- 7.3%
regexp: 29.8ms +/- 5.7% dna: 29.8ms +/- 5.7%
string: 469.3ms +/- 1.3% base64: 26.4ms +/- 9.0% fasta: 60.6ms +/- 6.2% tagcloud: 110.2ms +/- 1.9% unpack-code: 172.3ms +/- 1.1% validate-input: 99.8ms +/- 3.2%
Internet Explorer 9.0
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 1103.3ms +/- 0.3% -------------------------------------------- 3d: 154.5ms +/- 0.6% cube: 63.1ms +/- 1.2% morph: 21.0ms +/- 0.0% raytrace: 70.4ms +/- 1.0%
access: 131.6ms +/- 1.3% binary-trees: 20.1ms +/- 1.1% fannkuch: 41.6ms +/- 2.2% nbody: 57.0ms +/- 2.1% nsieve: 12.9ms +/- 1.8%
bitops: 83.3ms +/- 0.7% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 6.1ms +/- 3.7% bits-in-byte: 18.2ms +/- 3.1% bitwise-and: 26.0ms +/- 0.0% nsieve-bits: 33.0ms +/- 0.0%
controlflow: 11.0ms +/- 0.0% recursive: 11.0ms +/- 0.0%
crypto: 69.1ms +/- 0.3% aes: 25.9ms +/- 0.9% md5: 21.1ms +/- 1.1% sha1: 22.1ms +/- 1.0%
date: 142.9ms +/- 0.6% format-tofte: 49.6ms +/- 0.7% format-xparb: 93.3ms +/- 0.8%
math: 103.9ms +/- 0.5% cordic: 5.0ms +/- 0.0%
partial-sums: 71.9ms +/- 0.7% spectral-norm: 27.0ms +/- 0.0%
regexp: 32.0ms +/- 0.0% dna: 32.0ms +/- 0.0%
string: 375.0ms +/- 0.5% base64: 22.5ms +/- 1.7% fasta: 96.3ms +/- 1.4% tagcloud: 112.3ms +/- 0.5% unpack-code: 84.0ms +/- 0.8% validate-input: 59.9ms +/- 1.7%
HTC Desire Mobile Phone
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 5384.4ms +/- 2.7% --------------------------------------------
3d: 848.7ms +/- 8.1% cube: 294.0ms +/- 1.5% morph: 296.7ms +/- 16.9% raytrace: 258.0ms +/- 8.3%
access: 531.3ms +/- 0.6% binary-trees: 29.1ms +/- 3.7% fannkuch: 160.3ms +/- 0.8% nbody: 289.9ms +/- 0.4% nsieve: 52.0ms +/- 1.9%
bitops: 319.3ms +/- 10.9% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 25.1ms +/- 2.5% bits-in-byte: 54.0ms +/- 17.4% bitwise-and: 78.0ms +/- 9.5% nsieve-bits: 162.2ms +/- 12.5%
controlflow: 23.7ms +/- 46.2% recursive: 23.7ms +/- 46.2%
crypto: 341.4ms +/- 4.8% aes: 143.8ms +/- 5.3% md5: 104.9ms +/- 2.4% sha1: 92.7ms +/- 16.3%
date: 811.1ms +/- 6.2% format-tofte: 419.2ms +/- 12.1% format-xparb: 391.9ms +/- 2.3%
math: 467.7ms +/- 2.3% cordic: 175.6ms +/- 5.6% partial-sums: 226.9ms +/- 2.1% spectral-norm: 65.2ms +/- 3.0%
regexp: 155.3ms +/- 0.5% dna: 155.3ms +/- 0.5%
string: 1885.9ms +/- 2.2% base64: 193.2ms +/- 10.2%
Last edited by asymetrix on 03-Apr-2012 at 10:57 PM. Last edited by asymetrix on 02-Apr-2012 at 12:12 AM. Last edited by asymetrix on 02-Apr-2012 at 12:04 AM.
_________________ Download 499.26 Mbps, 659.94 Mbps Upload :) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 6:25:09
| | [ #73 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| Anyone anywhere developing javascript JIT for PPC ? _________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
itix
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 6:43:08
| | [ #74 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Dec-2004 Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world | | |
|
| @KimmoK
I doubt it would be worth of effort.
I mean, faster is better, but it is little bit too application specific. Last edited by itix on 02-Apr-2012 at 06:47 AM.
_________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 11:36:32
| | [ #75 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| Had to test on x86. ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
At work, "Centrino pro" (Core2Duo T7100 1.8Ghz, 2GB RAM) Lenovo T61 laptop, IE8: SunSpider Total: 6574.0ms +/- 1.9% (SAM440 is only 75% slower!) V8 bench: Score 44.4 (My SAM440 is only 15% slower, extreme LOL!) (CPU0 is loaded 25% and CPU1 75%, so these tests on IE does not benefit from dualcore at all ... generates nice heat though...)
Suddenly my SAM seems like a powerhouse!
Update: fired up both tests at the same time on the workputer: sunspider: 7329ms and v8: 41.4 (sunspider finished a lot earlier. funny how unresponsive windows becomes (difficult to move windows etc...), but now it used both cores at least)
So my SAM delivers 25...85% of the raw performance of a 1.8Ghz Core2dualcore laptop+IE8, when the test is not multithreaded. With multitasking (or multithread test) the laptop becomes 2x faster (it can perform 2x amount of work in the same time).
AOS4.2 SMP on x1000 + OWB will be interesting to test against wintel&IE8.
Last edited by KimmoK on 02-Apr-2012 at 02:22 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 02-Apr-2012 at 02:20 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 02-Apr-2012 at 02:18 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 02-Apr-2012 at 11:43 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 02-Apr-2012 at 11:37 AM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
stevieu
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 11:50:59
| | [ #76 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 23-Apr-2003 Posts: 647
From: England, UK | | |
|
| @nikosidis
Firefox 11 running on an i7 920 - 2.6GHz, 6GB RAM, Windows 7, bla bla.
First test: Total: 243.2ms +/- 0.8%
Second Test (V8 Benchmark Suite): Score: 6584 Last edited by stevieu on 02-Apr-2012 at 11:56 AM.
_________________ A1200T - OS4.0,OS3.9: 603e PPC 200mhz,060 50mhz, 256mb ram, FastATA MK-III, BVision, 160gb,20gb HDDs
A1200 - OS3.1: Blizzard IV 030, 64mb ram, 400mb HDD
OS4.x - Flying the AMIGA flag |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
K-L
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 13:37:10
| | [ #77 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 3-Mar-2006 Posts: 1411
From: Oullins, France | | |
|
| @Thread
AmigaOne G4 1,26 Ghz with MUI-OWB : 6710,9 ms
AMD Opteron 180 2,7 Ghz with FireFox 11 : 324,7 ms
_________________ PowerMac G5 2,7Ghz - 2GB - Radeon 9650 - MorphOS 3.14 AmigaONE X1000, 2GB, Sapphire Radeon HD 7700 FPGA Replay + DB 68060 at 85Mhz |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fishy_fis
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 15:00:51
| | [ #78 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 29-Mar-2004 Posts: 2160
From: Australia | | |
|
| Being that I dont take these sorts of comparisons seriously I tried while running Winue, watching a blu ray movie at 1080p, and rendering an animation in 3ds max (just the stuff I had running already when I read this thread and decided to try, point being its a heck of a lot slower than it could otherwise be). Run on an old version of Chrome, on a 3ghz c2d on WinXP
Score: 8282 Richards: 13962 DeltaBlue: 16893 Crypto: 16139 RayTrace: 11045 EarleyBoyer: 22039 RegExp: 2349 Splay: 3560 NavierStokes: 2858
and
============================================ RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals) -------------------------------------------- Total: 267.9ms +/- 0.9% --------------------------------------------
3d: 40.4ms +/- 6.4% cube: 13.2ms +/- 13.9% morph: 13.4ms +/- 6.3% raytrace: 13.8ms +/- 4.8%
access: 26.2ms +/- 4.0% binary-trees: 1.6ms +/- 23.1% fannkuch: 10.8ms +/- 4.2% nbody: 8.6ms +/- 4.3% nsieve: 5.2ms +/- 8.7%
bitops: 30.4ms +/- 2.3% 3bit-bits-in-byte: 6.0ms +/- 5.6% bits-in-byte: 7.3ms +/- 9.3% bitwise-and: 7.6ms +/- 6.6% nsieve-bits: 9.5ms +/- 5.3%
controlflow: 2.8ms +/- 10.8% recursive: 2.8ms +/- 10.8%
crypto: 21.1ms +/- 3.4% aes: 8.1ms +/- 6.5% md5: 6.7ms +/- 11.3% sha1: 6.3ms +/- 5.5%
date: 26.2ms +/- 3.6% format-tofte: 12.0ms +/- 4.9% format-xparb: 14.2ms +/- 7.4%
math: 29.2ms +/- 7.7% cordic: 8.8ms +/- 22.6% partial-sums: 13.5ms +/- 14.8% spectral-norm: 6.9ms +/- 23.1%
regexp: 10.7ms +/- 6.3% dna: 10.7ms +/- 6.3%
string: 80.9ms +/- 2.7% base64: 3.8ms +/- 7.9% fasta: 10.5ms +/- 5.8% tagcloud: 22.4ms +/- 5.5% unpack-code: 28.3ms +/- 2.7% validate-input: 15.9ms +/- 5.4%
I'll try again with a faster machine that's not running such heavy stuff at the same time later. Last edited by fishy_fis on 02-Apr-2012 at 03:11 PM. Last edited by fishy_fis on 02-Apr-2012 at 03:05 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
sicky
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 16:18:57
| | [ #79 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 11-Mar-2003 Posts: 2843
From: Essex, UK | | |
|
| @nikosidis
From your latest test I got 46 with my SAM460 and muiowb _________________ SAM 460 with 2GB or RAM, 1000GB HD, 4 port SATA, DVDRW drive and Radeon HD 4650 GFX card. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
nikosidis
| |
Re: Browser benchmarks Posted on 2-Apr-2012 16:41:53
| | [ #80 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 9-Dec-2008 Posts: 995
From: Norway, Oslo | | |
|
| Thank you all. I will see if I ever got time to put up a list, to show all this info ;)
I don't know if it is even interesting.
The conclusion must be that JIT enabled makes a huge difference when it comes to java-script.
Last edited by nikosidis on 02-Apr-2012 at 04:43 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|