Poster | Thread |
QuikSanz
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 18-May-2014 22:10:57
| | [ #21 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 28-Mar-2003 Posts: 1236
From: Harbor Gateway, Gardena, Ca. | | |
|
| @Massi,
Your problem may be more CPU/Buss speed than graphics mem.
Chris
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tonyw
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 18-May-2014 23:37:40
| | [ #22 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 8-Mar-2003 Posts: 3240
From: Sydney (of course) | | |
|
| @Rob
Don't even suggest it, it might be taken literally.
I know of one guy who got a hacksaw and cut the corresponding slot in his new card to make it fit. I don't know what happened when he turned the power on.
I'm merely quoting ACube's own words, from their manual. Some people don't read them.
_________________ cheers tony
Hyperion Support Forum: http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.biz/index.php |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Rob
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 19-May-2014 6:31:51
| | [ #23 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 20-Mar-2003 Posts: 6359
From: S.Wales | | |
|
| @tonyw
Funnily enough I actually saw a mod last week for turning x8 PCIe card into a x1 card by doing just that.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
olegil
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 19-May-2014 7:29:08
| | [ #24 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Aug-2003 Posts: 5895
From: Work | | |
|
| @tonyw
Unless his hacksawing skills were exceedingly bad I expect it simply worked.
A much easier solution (if there is space on the motherboard) is to just cut away some plastic from the socket, to make it open ended. There's still guiding in the other end and the keying tab. _________________ This weeks pet peeve: Using "voltage" instead of "potential", which leads to inventing new words like "amperage" instead of "current" (I, measured in A) or possible "charge" (amperehours, Ah or Coulomb, C). Sometimes I don't even know what people mean. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 19-May-2014 7:41:33
| | [ #25 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Deniil715
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 19-May-2014 11:56:50
| | [ #26 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 14-May-2003 Posts: 4236
From: Sweden | | |
|
| @QuikSanz
Quote:
I know this was a problem with Eyetech A1's but didn't think it was an issue with Sam's. |
It was a driver problem I think. The driver couldn't handle multiple banks of gfx memory, OR it was very difficult to find the second bank or something.... In the beginning the driver would assume all memory was in one chunk but when 128MB was used up the driver started "using" memory where there was no memory on the card, because the second bank was elsewhere. Something like that. Doubt it was an AmigaOne issue.
@olegil
Quote:
Unless his hacksawing skills were exceedingly bad I expect it simply worked. |
I think tonyw was talking about a normal PCI card, to make it fit in a wrong voltage slot. I also heard that story... _________________ - Don't get fooled by my avatar, I'm not like that (anymore, mostly... maybe only sometimes) > Amiga Classic and OS4 developer for OnyxSoft. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Massi
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 19-May-2014 12:28:48
| | [ #27 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 2-Feb-2011 Posts: 628
From: Rome, Italy | | |
|
| @All
Thanks for all contributions ... can someone recommend a specific model that is known to work well?
_________________ SAM440EP-FLEX @ 733 Mhz, AmigaOS 4.1 Update 1 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
PR
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 19-May-2014 12:42:30
| | [ #28 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 1-Sep-2004 Posts: 1961
From: Suomi-Finland | | |
|
| Changed the Radeon 8500 that was installed to the XE to a ASUS 9250 AGPx8 (128MB DDR) as Hyperion said it was the most supported one.
Good or bad move?
More later heard it's slower? The guys were releaved in the local shop that they got rid of such old HW and this was a few years ago;) Not too expensive either.
Well, it works fine and is cooler. 9200 Pro should be faster so got a bit confused about this numbering idea? I think we know better than many else.
Maybe a graphics test?
Found the 9250 box and it says AGP or PCI express, has DVI but using VGA as the displays input in the monitor is reserved for the pc's vga that has two so it's quite handy with a kb+mouseswitch.
Last edited by PR on 19-May-2014 at 12:44 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 19-May-2014 15:39:49
| | [ #29 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9598
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @PR
8500 is not fully supported by OS4, so good choice. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
PR
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 20-May-2014 3:45:26
| | [ #30 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 1-Sep-2004 Posts: 1961
From: Suomi-Finland | | |
|
| @pavlor
Thanks. Tested Mui4, Dopus and OWB all worked fine. Youtube was a bit slow but it worked. This is about optimazing maybe or could we get more from the GFX card as it's been the best supported;)
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Massi
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 20-May-2014 11:48:15
| | [ #31 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 2-Feb-2011 Posts: 628
From: Rome, Italy | | |
|
| @All
Does anyone own a Radeon 9250 (PCI, 256 MB, 128 BIT, DDR, VGA, DVI, TV-OUT) for the SAM440EP-FLEX?
Does it have a passive cooling?
From which manufacturer (ATI, Sapphire, ...)?
I hope to get a precise response, thanks.
Last edited by Massi on 20-May-2014 at 11:52 AM.
_________________ SAM440EP-FLEX @ 733 Mhz, AmigaOS 4.1 Update 1 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Jupp3
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 20-May-2014 21:47:50
| | [ #32 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 22-Feb-2007 Posts: 1225
From: Unknown | | |
|
| You can compare different video cards (yes, even our "current" old ones) at gpureview.com. Select "Compare cards", and you can compare 2 different models side by side.
However, note that: -All our currently "3D supported" cards are rather ancient compared to anything more modern, and speed differences betwen them, while perhaps noticeable, might not alone be good enough reason to upgrade. -Even if it looks like same card, units produced by different manufacturers can vary greatly. -Instead of pure speed, also consider other factors, such as noise (active / passive cooling), available connectors and software support (3D acceleration, overlay...)
On MorphOS, people recommend always trying to get the 128bit version (instead of 64bit). I guess OS4 will also benefit from this the most, as it affects the overall bus speed (and slow bus is even worse when you lack VBO support, like we do... Of course games also need to support it)
And yes, if there are some driver issues with 8500, 9000, 9100 and 9200 on OS4, I'd recommend avoiding them too. But on the other hand, wouldn't recommend "downgrade" from such board you already own, unless you really DO have some issues (crashes, gfx corruption, whatever) or missing features (no overlay or such) Last edited by Jupp3 on 20-May-2014 at 09:53 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
PR
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 20-May-2014 22:23:01
| | [ #33 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 1-Sep-2004 Posts: 1961
From: Suomi-Finland | | |
|
| @Jupp3
PIV is very nice too;)
I think all these "pc crap" are fine compared to the zero work they have to do. Bought a NVidia 8800 GTX Extraturbo Special Porsche injection and it gave a few years more for a stock pc.
I'd like that and drivers to make a HTML5 video in Youtybe to work flawlessly. Should not be about the HW. Interestingly waiting for a fast booting Net machine. Since 2002;) (My XE..)
Typing with an A1200... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
realize
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 21-May-2014 0:34:12
| | [ #34 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 14-Apr-2003 Posts: 1797
From: nyc | | |
|
| @Rob
Quote:
To get a 5v card to fit in a 3.3v sot wouldn't you have to remove the card's rear bracket and install it the wrong way round?
|
yes I think you are correct with this. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
QuikSanz
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 21-May-2014 2:46:36
| | [ #35 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 28-Mar-2003 Posts: 1236
From: Harbor Gateway, Gardena, Ca. | | |
|
| @Deniil715,
The post I was responding to in that thread was about his original performance issue. Samflex with a 733 processor and its bus are not the fastest.
PS: I still haven't heard of any other A1 machines having the "no 256 mem" showing problem except for the Eyetech ones.
Chris
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Rob
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 21-May-2014 2:47:59
| | [ #36 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 20-Mar-2003 Posts: 6359
From: S.Wales | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
olegil
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 21-May-2014 8:03:35
| | [ #37 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 22-Aug-2003 Posts: 5895
From: Work | | |
|
| @realize
Quote:
realize wrote: @Rob
Quote:
To get a 5v card to fit in a 3.3v sot wouldn't you have to remove the card's rear bracket and install it the wrong way round?
|
yes I think you are correct with this. |
EEEEEK. No, that's not it at all. The connector is backwards, but the pins are the right way. If you plug it in backwards you'll do ALL sorts of wrong.
I cannot for the life of me figure out why people wouldn't be making universal voltage PCI cards in this day and age._________________ This weeks pet peeve: Using "voltage" instead of "potential", which leads to inventing new words like "amperage" instead of "current" (I, measured in A) or possible "charge" (amperehours, Ah or Coulomb, C). Sometimes I don't even know what people mean. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
TRIPOS
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 21-May-2014 15:18:34
| | [ #38 ] |
|
|
|
Super Member |
Joined: 4-Apr-2014 Posts: 1205
From: Unknown | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 26-May-2014 15:50:56
| | [ #39 ] |
|
|
|
Elite Member |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11232
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @Rob
Quote:
Some 256Mb cards have one bank of 256 and some have two banks of 128. |
Yes that sounds like the one I was thinking of. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Massi
| |
Re: A more powerful ATI Radeon 9250 graphics card? Posted on 6-Sep-2014 13:26:18
| | [ #40 ] |
|
|
|
Cult Member |
Joined: 2-Feb-2011 Posts: 628
From: Rome, Italy | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|