Quote:

Hammer wrote: @cdimauro It's a good thing that X86 CPU administration is not run by fools like you. 386 stakeholders' bundled PMMU is good for progressing the PC install base towards the Lintel and Wintel situation i.e. it's solving the chicken vs egg issue while the Amiga platform is stuck with the MMU install base issue! 286 selection over NECV30's fast 8086 clone is about being compatible with the 286 instruction set, which included a segmented MMU. Any PC/AT can run Xenix 286. 386SX-16 selection over 286-16 is about being compatible with the 386 instruction set. Any 386AT can run Xenix 386 and SCO Open Desktop. X86-64 selection over IA-32 is about being compatible with the X86-64 instruction set. You don't understand simple road maps. NT'ed AmigaOS with MMU-less majority install base is comical. MIPS's embedded MMU bundle is about being competitive for money. It's a simple concept that you don't understand. Amiga Homber's targeting Windows NT shows the unpreparedness with a lack of "next generation" C2-capable AmigaOS, and Commodore wasted resources on AT&T's Unix OS via the AMIX project. AMIX = Make AT&T Great Again. Apple didn't bet its future on AT&T's Unix IP-infected A/UX.

I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS IS EXTREMELY IN-TOPIC WITH HYPERION'S ENTERTAINMENT REORG/RESTRUCTURE

SIGNED

MEGA "RJ" MICAL

_________________
I HAVE ABS OF STEEL
--
CAN YOU SEE ME? CAN YOU HEAR ME? OK FOR WORK

@Hammer

Quote:

Hammer wrote: @cdimauro It's a good thing that X86 CPU administration is not run by fools like you. 386 stakeholders' bundled PMMU is good for progressing the PC install base towards the Lintel and Wintel situation i.e. it's solving the chicken vs egg issue while the Amiga platform is stuck with the MMU install base issue! 286 selection over NECV30's fast 8086 clone is about being compatible with the 286 instruction set, which included a segmented MMU. Any PC/AT can run Xenix 286. 386SX-16 selection over 286-16 is about being compatible with the 386 instruction set. Any 386AT can run Xenix 386 and SCO Open Desktop. X86-64 selection over IA-32 is about being compatible with the X86-64 instruction set. You don't understand simple road maps. NT'ed AmigaOS with MMU-less majority install base is comical. MIPS's embedded MMU bundle is about being competitive for money. It's a simple concept that you don't understand. Amiga Homber's targeting Windows NT shows the unpreparedness with a lack of "next generation" C2-capable AmigaOS, and Commodore wasted resources on AT&T's Unix OS via the AMIX project. AMIX = Make AT&T Great Again. Apple didn't bet its future on AT&T's Unix IP-infected A/UX.

@cdimauro



PCX 2.1 demo's MMU-less 386 emulator wreaks your short-signed argument.

_________________

Quote:

MEGA_RJ_MICAL wrote: I HEREBY CERTIFY THIS IS EXTREMELY IN-TOPIC WITH HYPERION'S ENTERTAINMENT REORG/RESTRUCTURE SIGNED MEGA "RJ" MICAL

Amiga 500's 68000 selection kept up with mainstream game consoles' CPU selection, such as the Sega Mega Drive's 68000 selection.

From 2005/2006, neo-AmigaOS PowerPC didn't deliver value vs performance competitive PowerAmiga 500 that is $100 above PS3's price. At worst, it should be Wii's PPC G3 with SIMD + $100 on top. PPC CPU vendors have price discrimination against startups; i.e., only large bulk customers receive a volume price discount.

PiStorm'ed RPi 4B/CM4 equipped Amiga's ARM Cortex 72 CPU selection has closed the gap with mainstream game console e.g. Switch's ARM Cortex A57.

Last edited by Hammer on 05-Sep-2025 at 02:24 PM.
Last edited by Hammer on 05-Sep-2025 at 02:22 PM.

_________________

pistorm is worth nothing shit that changes amiga into keyboard interface for rpi
using this shit is extremelly stupid because amiga keyboard was copied 40 years ago from pc

you can just use winuae and have the some for zero euro/usd etc

@ppcamiga1

It's like clockwork! Lol

_________________
Indigo 3D Lounge, my second home.
The Illusion of Choice | Am*ga

@ppcamiga1

I know you do this to get reactions, but it's getting tiring.

@ppcamiga1

Quote:

ppcamiga1 wrote: pistorm is worth nothing shit that changes amiga into keyboard interface for rpi using this shit is extremelly stupid because amiga keyboard was copied 40 years ago from pc you can just use winuae and have the some for zero euro/usd etc

PiStorm32+RPi approach is not much different from the Phase 5 BlizzardPPC+BlizzardVision approach.

The major difference is that the RPi module is universal for other products, which is useful for mass production with economies of scale, while BlizzardPPC+BlizzardVision is specific to the minority A1200 install base.

Broadcom supported RPi with a low-priced SoC for the 1st 10,000 SBC production batch. Broadcom is better for startups, not Freescale/NXP PowerPC.

Last edited by Hammer on 07-Sep-2025 at 12:33 AM.
Last edited by Hammer on 07-Sep-2025 at 12:28 AM.

_________________

pistorm is worth nothing shit that changes amiga into keyboard interface for rpi
amiga keyboard was copied 40 years ago from pc
if you using pistorm you are idiot because you may have the some for zero euro
just use winuae on pc

@ppcamiga1

Quote:

ppcamiga1 wrote: pistorm is worth nothing shit that changes amiga into keyboard interface for rpi amiga keyboard was copied 40 years ago from pc if you using pistorm you are idiot because you may have the some for zero euro just use winuae on pc

Got your evidence/proof of this claim yet?? I am still waiting

_________________
Live Long and keep Amigaing!

A1200, Power Tower, TF1260 128MB RAM, 68060 Rev 6, OS3.9 BB2, HD-Floppy, Mediator TX+ PCI, Voodoo 3 3000, Soundblaster 4.1, TV Card, Spider USB, 100MBit Ethernet, 16GB CF HD, 52xCDRom.

@ppcamiga1

Quote:

ppcamiga1 wrote: pistorm is worth nothing shit that changes amiga into keyboard interface for rpi amiga keyboard was copied 40 years ago from pc

The Model F keyboard first appeared with the IBM System/23 Datamaster all-in-one computer, which existed before the original IBM PC.
Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_F_keyboard

IBM PC AT initially had a Model F keyboard in 1984 before switching to Model M in 1985.

You applied a negative narrative against IBM's keyboard design while supporting IBM's PowerPC ISA? You're a hypocrite.


Quote:

if you using pistorm you are idiot because you may have the some for zero euro just use winuae on pc

FYI, there are plans for PPC emulation with Emu68 since it has unused CPU cores.

AArch64's big-endian mode and 32 GPR programming model have less translation overhead when compared to little-endian/16 GPR X86-64's PPC emulation.

AArch64 can match PPC on arithmetic operations and the discrete load-store RISC instruction model.

Last edited by Hammer on 08-Sep-2025 at 04:13 AM.
Last edited by Hammer on 08-Sep-2025 at 04:10 AM.
Last edited by Hammer on 08-Sep-2025 at 04:04 AM.

_________________

@thread

The latest news from: https://xcancel.com/amigadocuments

Quote:

Ben Hermans has lost his case against Ben Hermans BV and his former fellow shareholders at Hyperion Entertainment. He now has three months to file an appeal with the Court of Cassation.

Legal document

#6

_________________
This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author.
*Secrecy has served us so well*

@number6

Quote:

number6 wrote: @thread The latest news from: https://xcancel.com/amigadocuments Quote: Ben Hermans has lost his case against Ben Hermans BV and his former fellow shareholders at Hyperion Entertainment. He now has three months to file an appeal with the Court of Cassation. Legal document #6

PROPHECY BETWEEN THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
I HAVE ABS OF STEEL
--
CAN YOU SEE ME? CAN YOU HEAR ME? OK FOR WORK

@thread

Additional note on this Court of Cassation, by generative AI. Not surprising, as it is the equivalent of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Please note: They do not review the facts. They merely deal with the application of the law.

Quote:

AI Overview Appealing to the Belgian Court of Cassation is expensive, as it requires specialized lawyers and involves high court fees, with registry fees alone for initiating a case often around 650 EUR. Additional costs include bailiff fees (approx. 275-300 EUR) and, crucially, high legal fees for complex, specialized representation. Lydian Lydian +4 Key cost factors for the Court of Cassation (Hof van Cassatie/Cour de cassation) include: High Legal Fees: Representation by a lawyer specialized in the Court of Cassation is mandatory, and these experts charge high hourly rates for complex procedural work. Court Registration Fees: A fee of 650 EUR (rolrecht/droit de rôle) is required to place the case on the agenda. Bailiff Costs: Serving the petition to the opposing party costs approximately 275 EUR to 300 EUR. Legal Representation Costs (Legal Indemnity): If you lose, you may be ordered to pay a fixed statutory compensation to the opposing party, which can be significant depending on the case value. Given the specialized nature of the court, which reviews legal accuracy rather than facts, costs are generally high, making it a "last resort" option.

#6

Last edited by number6 on 24-Feb-2026 at 02:34 PM.

_________________
This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author.
*Secrecy has served us so well*

Quote:

number6 wrote: Quote: Ben Hermans has lost his case against Ben Hermans BV and his former fellow shareholders at Hyperion Entertainment. He now has three months to file an appeal with the Court of Cassation. Legal document The miraculous, majestic mega_rj_mical wrote: PROPHECY BETWEEN THE LINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

PROPHECIES OF FREEDOM HIDDEN IN MAINSTREAM NEWS KEEP HINTING AT OUR IMPENDING LIBERATION!!!!

TODAY:

_________________
I HAVE ABS OF STEEL
--
CAN YOU SEE ME? CAN YOU HEAR ME? OK FOR WORK