@Birbo

Quote:

The problem is, that the existing agreements are interpreted differently.

Well clearly the court is equally confused at this point.

January:
"The Parties resumed settlement discussions to resolve all of the matters between them in October 2020. On Thursday of last week, the Parties reached the terms of settlement on the main agreement. The only tasks that need to be completed are for the Parties to attend to seven ancillary documents, including an assignment and novation agreement, mutual releases, stipulations of dismissal, and documents related to a proceeding in Belgium. In addition, Hyperion requires additional time to confer on one point with counsel in Delaware regarding a security interest. The additional time requested will enable the Parties to focus exclusively on finalizing documents and following through with the settlement."

Note the word "only" and "ancillary" (subordinate-secondary in nature). The court indicated there indeed was agreement and stressed this by use of those words.

Then *poof*. Hyperion files for further delay followed by a new string of documents referred to as "motions", "response to motions", "replies to responses to motions" etc.

Given the above, what assurance is there that any further progress Judge Martinez may "think" is occurring will not suffer the same fate?

#6

_________________
This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author.
*Secrecy has served us so well*

@Birbo

situation is clear.
Hyperion has os.
Battilana may use unmodified Amiga Os 3.1 only for games only.
Battilana should use what he has and stop this court crap.