Quote:

ppcamiga1 wrote: And I see no reasons why not switch to better cpu than 68k as long as it is not as the some in pc

Could you please explain, in your beautiful sophisticated English,
why not "some in pc"?

Could you?





/MEGA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!






LAST EDITED BY HAMMER

Last edited by MEGA_RJ_MICAL on 29-Aug-2025 at 10:39 AM.

_________________
I HAVE ABS OF STEEL
--
CAN YOU SEE ME? CAN YOU HEAR ME? OK FOR WORK

@Hammer

Quote:

Hammer wrote: @cdimauro You're still wrong on Windows 3.1 Enhancement Mode. PCX 2.1 demo (up to 386 unreal mode without 386 PMMU) says Hi. Ignorant fool. A simple test is to run EMM386 on PCX 2.1 demo, and it fails.

Again, this is a further prove that bots don't know the context and randomly write on completely different discussions. In fact, the above is related to this thread: https://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=43330&forum=16&start=560&viewmode=flat&order=0

It also proves that bots have NO memory, since an answer was already given in that thread.

But likely, and much simpler, it's also because bots do NOT understand.

Unfortunately, bots have a lot of time on their hands (which humans do not have), and they also infest other places:

https://telegra.ph/Opinion-PPC-68080-and-other-660-comments-07-25-2
i'm still not convinced if you are human or some AI driven weird bot

http://eab.abime.net/showpost.php?s=637f13770c1a6df46269da40062f3141&p=1758051&postcount=722
I still wonder if hammer is just some locally trained LLM with some human editing.

It's a drama...

Anyway, you got the proper reply on the proper thread: https://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=43330&forum=16&start=580&viewmode=flat&order=0#880647

Enjoy it, bot!
Quote:

From Windows Resource Kit 2MEMWW The Windows VMM maintains the virtual memory page table that lists the pages currently in physical memory and those swapped to disk. Because 386 enhanced mode is a multitasking environment, the VMM page table also lists which memory pages belong to which processes. When the VMM needs a page not currently in physical memory, it calls the pageswap device, which allocates virtual memory and maps pages into and out of physical memory. Some virtual memory systems rely on program segmentation to do their work. Although the code for a Windows application is segmented as described earlier, Windows virtual memory management is not related to this segmentation. All virtual and physical memory is divided into 4K pages, and the system is managed on this basis. Page mapping starts at 0000K and works its way up. Two kinds of pages can be allocated: physical pages and virtual pages. The possible amount of physical pages is the amount of physical memory in the machine divided by 4K. Memory allocated to an application is made up of virtual pages, and at any time a virtual page can be in physical memory or swapped to the hard disk.

You continue to desperately search for something that might validate the colossal nonsense you have uttered, being a first-class ignorant, and you don't even realise that in the relevant thread you have already been answered on this very point, and what's more, in bold and underlined, but you are in such a bad way that you can't connect the dots with the lines even when the lines are already drawn out in front of your eyes.

You are a hopeless case...
Quote:

386 PC stakeholders steered the x86 PC install base to create their destination ecosystem, which can support a 32-bit preemptive multitasking/memory-protected/multi-user C2 OS. Windows NT displaced the existing Xenix 386's 32-bit preemptive multitasking/memory-protected/multi-user C2 OS use case. Unlike other AT&T Unix licensees on non-X86 platforms, Xenix 386 runs v8086 DOS business applications. Microsoft's Windows NT's goal is to kick out AT&T Unix-tainted IP. Windows NT's use case is not new! Both Apple (via NeXTStep) and Microsoft refuse to build their future 32-bit preemptive multitasking/memory-protected/multi-user C2 operating systems on AT&T Unix-tainted IP.

And already replied on the PROPER thread, of course.
Quote:

Keep crying, ignorant fool.

I enjoy seeing you continue to fret, desperately trying to satisfy your wounded ego. Your anger is my joy...

@ppcamiga1

Quote:

ppcamiga1 wrote: Commodore bankrupt bacause AGA was shit. They made 256 colors bitplanes not chunky. There was no DOOM. Rest is history. Amiga with 020 and FAST is good enough to play DOOM like on 386 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kDM3S7gQTk AGA was shit. I always wanted better graphics in my Amiga. I never want hardware banging. Forget about it. Hardware banging end in 1992 when they stoped production of a500 and a1200 come. want 68k? ok. Just add better graphics to Amiga.

So you bought an Amiga and now you're cursing it... because it was an Amiga.

Priceless...

@ppcamiga1

>want 68k? ok.
>Just add better graphics to Amiga.

You know how better graphics is added to 68k ? PiStorm A second option would be Vampire.

@cdimauro

Quote:

cdimauro wrote: So you bought an Amiga and now you're cursing it... because it was an Amiga.

ppcamiga1 is the kind of consumer who needs to p0wn others. When he bought the A1200 at some point in '93 he did it to p0wn his friends who were buying ugly and boxy 286 and 386 PCs and playing games in 16 colours with beep boop audio. He felt mighty superior for a short while playing 256 colour games with 8-bit stereo sound, until Doom was widely available in 1994 and no Amiga version in sight On top of that, the prices of 486 PCs was coming down rapidly, and Commodore filed for bankruptcy.

Not being able to p0wn anyone from the deck of a sinking ship, he sold the only Amiga he ever had and went over to the DOS/Windows side, where I'm sure he chased almost annual upgrades of CPUs and graphics cards to feel superior to his fellow computer users.

I'm sure he even enjoyed the console wars, and no doubt is a Playstation zealot claiming technical superiority.

Jump to today, ppcamiga1 knows that A-EON's systems are high-price low-qty AmigaOS 4 machines for only the most discerning of Amigan's, with wallets to match. Once again he is in the p0wn position, from which he likes to sling mud at any other system which would challenge his position upon his high horse.

He did try an purchase an A1200 several years back, but he whined about how ridiculously overpriced working A1200 hardware was on Ebay. This from a person who purchased a SAM460.

I've known more than a few people like him. He displays all the symptoms, including the repetitive post he will feel compelled to post upon reading this.

_________________
All the way, with 68k

@agami

Quote:

agami wrote: @cdimauro Quote: cdimauro wrote: So you bought an Amiga and now you're cursing it... because it was an Amiga. ppcamiga1 is the kind of consumer who needs to p0wn others. When he bought the A1200 at some point in '93 he did it to p0wn his friends who were buying ugly and boxy 286 and 386 PCs and playing games in 16 colours with beep boop audio. He felt mighty superior for a short while playing 256 colour games with 8-bit stereo sound, until Doom was widely available in 1994 and no Amiga version in sight On top of that, the prices of 486 PCs was coming down rapidly, and Commodore filed for bankruptcy. Not being able to p0wn anyone from the deck of a sinking ship, he sold the only Amiga he ever had and went over to the DOS/Windows side, where I'm sure he chased almost annual upgrades of CPUs and graphics cards to feel superior to his fellow computer users. I'm sure he even enjoyed the console wars, and no doubt is a Playstation zealot claiming technical superiority. Jump to today, ppcamiga1 knows that A-EON's systems are high-price low-qty AmigaOS 4 machines for only the most discerning of Amigan's, with wallets to match. Once again he is in the p0wn position, from which he likes to sling mud at any other system which would challenge his position upon his high horse. He did try an purchase an A1200 several years back, but he whined about how ridiculously overpriced working A1200 hardware was on Ebay. This from a person who purchased a SAM460. I've known more than a few people like him. He displays all the symptoms, including the repetitive post he will feel compelled to post upon reading this.

In simple words: he's completely crazy.

@ppcamiga1

Quote:

Commodore bankrupt bacause AGA was shit.

Wrong. Mass A600 production in 1992.

Quote:

They made 256 colors bitplanes not chunky

There are two pathways for Amiga's chunky pixel problem.
1. Release hardware with chunky pixel support,
or
2. Release a turnkey game optimized blitter C2P sample source code via the official SDK method. Must reduce R&D risk for 3rd party developers.

Remove all software C2P is slow warning in all official documentation. Internal corporate politics shouldn't spill into the public domain.

_________________

@cdimauro

_________________

I never ever write retro code on amiga
my first amiga was amiga 1200 and I started from 256 colors
writing retro code on amiga even then at end of 1992 was stupid and obsolete
256 colors in 1992 was the future

@ppcamiga1

Quote:

I never ever write retro code on amiga my first amiga was amiga 1200 and I started from 256 colors

Amiga 1200 is retro.

Quote:

writing retro code on amiga even then at end of 1992 was stupid and obsolete 256 colors in 1992 was the future

256 color display mode appeared with IBM PGC in 1984, which reappeared in MCGA's 1986 era Mode13h.

IBM PGC's 640x480p resolution use case recycled for MCGA's 1986 era mode 11h.

VGA/MCGA's mode 13h has a similar year age as the 1986 Amiga 1000 PAL release's 64 color EHB OCS release.

Blame Herni Rubin for his monochrome hi-res Denise management directive in 1986.

MCGA's mode 11h and mode 13h were recycled for VGA. VGA's mode 13h has extra hardware features that are used for mode X/mode Y.

Jeff Porter's 8-bitplanes argument in 1987 was ignored until CSG's C65 (8-bitplanes) reveal in early 1989.

After CSG's C65 (8-bitplanes) reveal, Herni Rubin allowed AGA's R&D in 1989.

Last edited by Hammer on 08-Sep-2025 at 04:30 AM.

_________________