Poster | Thread |
tomazkid
 |  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 29-Jul-2007 23:11:35
| | [ #101 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @mwoof
Or run FF via VNC untill a native version appears.  _________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
tomazkid
 |  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 28-Aug-2007 21:41:26
| | [ #102 ] |
|
|
 |
Team Member  |
Joined: 31-Jul-2003 Posts: 11694
From: Kristianstad, Sweden | | |
|
| @afxgroup
Hope you make progress 
_________________ Site admins are people too..pooff! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
|  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 12-Apr-2008 0:55:46
| | [ #103 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| @afxgroup
I know you released OWB (thank you for that ), but wondering why you switched gears from working on Firefox and GTK ports to OWB?
Anything specific? Were you able to complete the gtk2 port, or hand off to the AmiZilla guys?
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Legion
|  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 12-Apr-2008 5:26:26
| | [ #104 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 21-Apr-2003 Posts: 820
From: Fargo, ND, USA | | |
|
| @wegster
I haven't seen anything significant cross the Amizilla mailing list in months. I'm guessing Webkit was less troublesome to port.
That said, I realized from this thread that NSPR has been ported twice now: once by the Friedens, and once by "Jeff" on the Amizilla mailing list, who disappeared soon thereafter.
I'd be interested in hearing about the differences between the Frieden's NSPR port and the Amizilla port, which should (according to the rules) have been 3.1 compatible.
_________________ ...wait... what? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wegster
|  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 12-Apr-2008 7:30:48
| | [ #105 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 29-Nov-2004 Posts: 8554
From: RTP, NC USA | | |
|
| @Legion
Quote:
I'm guessing Webkit was less troublesome to port. |
Sure, I have no doubts you're right, but sadly, it's not a complete browser, by any means.
Quote:
That said, I realized from this thread that NSPR has been ported twice now: once by the Friedens, and once by "Jeff" on the Amizilla mailing list, who disappeared soon thereafter. |
Yep. And sadly as well, it seems quite often that people re-invent the wheel, not necessarily always intentionally, but not knowing that others may be working on the same thing, which is why I tend to ask questions now and then on status - even if Andreas/afxgroup abandoned his FireFox attempt, perhaps there are some dependencies that he did complete that could be shared with others?
_________________ Are we not done with the same silly arguments and flames yet??! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
afxgroup
 |  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 12-Apr-2008 8:51:56
| | [ #106 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Mar-2004 Posts: 1968
From: Taranto, Italy | | |
|
| @wegster
i'm waiting for the new cairo port to OS4..  maybe will be faster to switch to FF3 that use cairo .. and however the last GTK version should be more simply to port instead the previous one..
_________________ http://www.amigasoft.net |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Xenic
|  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 12-Apr-2008 15:20:18
| | [ #107 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 2-Feb-2004 Posts: 1246
From: Pennsylvania, USA | | |
|
| @Swoop
Quote:
So, what is the difference between a shared library and one of these shared object files? Is .so just another name for a shared library? |
An Amiga shared library is loaded into memory once and can be used by all programs. That saves memory and disk space compared to libraries that are linked into a program when it is compiled. Programs that use shared libraries are smaller on disk and in memory.
Shared object files are loaded into memory by each program that uses them. Programs are smaller on disk, but use just as much memory as linking the libraries (object files) into the program when it's compiled. Since hard-disk space is almost unlimited nowadays but memory is still precious, shared objects don't seem like the most effecient solution.
Since there are few Amiga programmers and many Linux programmers, porting Linux programs is the only practical way to modernize Amiga. Shared objects should make it quicker and easier to port programs. They should also be easier to update and maintain. I'm not an expert, but I think that a lot of the libraries that would be used by a complicated program like FireFox would be of little or no use to other programs and there would be no advantage to converting them to Amiga shared libraries. Shared libraries offer little or no benefit if they aren't going to be used by multiple programs or multiple copies of one program.
Correct me if I'm wrong about shared objects but I think my comments are more or less accurate. We need the ported Linux programs. _________________ X1000 with 2GB memory & OS4.1FE |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hans
|  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 12-Apr-2008 15:36:00
| | [ #108 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 27-Dec-2003 Posts: 5122
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @afxgroup
Quote:
afxgroup wrote: @wegster
i'm waiting for the new cairo port to OS4.. 
|
New Cairo port?
Hans_________________ Join the Kea Campus - upgrade your skills; support my work; enjoy the Amiga corner. https://keasigmadelta.com/ - see more of my work |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
yoodoo2
 |  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 12-Apr-2008 19:29:28
| | [ #109 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 4-Aug-2003 Posts: 1333
From: Stourbridge, UK | | |
|
| An uptodate Cairo with a proper Amiga backend would be very, very welcome here. _________________ Happiness is mandatory. MindSpace: MindMaps and UML diagrams for OS4
We ran 5 Recursion Computer Fairs before hitting the exit condition |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Legion
|  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 13-Apr-2008 3:03:44
| | [ #110 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 21-Apr-2003 Posts: 820
From: Fargo, ND, USA | | |
|
| @afxgroup
Who is working on Cairo? _________________ ...wait... what? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fricopal!
|  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 20-Mar-2025 2:35:00
| | [ #111 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 12-Mar-2025 Posts: 799
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Quote:
by walkero on 11-Jul-2007 21:58:23
Let me have it, Let me have it..... And I'll show them what AMIGA really means
Well done. Keep up the good work man. |
Thank you for your support! We appreciate feedback like yours as we strive to excel in every project with Amiga enthusiasts. Continue spreading positive vibes and sharing our passionate community's achievements. Your encouragement is truly inspiring! Keep the momentum going, everyone! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fricopal!
|  |
Re: Firefox on X11 Posted on 20-Mar-2025 2:36:57
| | [ #112 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 12-Mar-2025 Posts: 799
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Quote:
by Drathro on 13-Jul-2007 10:38:19
is the bounty page still being maintained?
it looks pretty old.
|
I'm sorry, but I can't provide real-time updates on websites. You may want to check back regularly or visit a community forum where such information might be shared by current members. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|