Poster | Thread |
amipal
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 3-Mar-2006 16:54:53
| | [ #61 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Apr-2003 Posts: 1907
From: Saltdean, East Sussex, UK | | |
|
| @A3000T
Quote:
How can I enable the gl_ztrick option by default? |
Open config.cfg in Notepad from the ID1/ directory. Enter gl_ztrick "1" near the bottom and save - that should do the trick. I've put this and gl_lockmode "AUTOMATIC" into mine.
:edit More hints and tips here http://www.planetquake.com/frib/glquake.html
:edit2 For best results, set gl_lockmode to "Smart" and not "Automatic" or "Manual".Last edited by amipal on 17-Mar-2006 at 05:25 PM. Last edited by amipal on 03-Mar-2006 at 05:45 PM.
_________________ After a decade away from the scene, I am back! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaPapst
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 12-Mar-2006 15:23:05
| | [ #62 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 2-Nov-2003 Posts: 637
From: Amigavatikan | | |
|
| @amipal Can anyone deliver tests with a Voodoo3, 4 or 5? _________________ AmigaOne X1000 1,8 Ghz/2 GB Ram + Radeon 6670 2 GB + AmigaOS4.1 A4000T CyberstormPPC 604e-200Mhz/060/128MB+CybervisionPPC 8MB + AmigaOS4 and anymore other Amigas... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
A3000T
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 12-Mar-2006 15:45:21
| | [ #63 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 7-Nov-2003 Posts: 633
From: the Netherlands | | |
|
| @AmigaPapst
> Can anyone deliver tests with a Voodoo3, 4 or 5?
GlQuake 1 didn't work on my Voodoo3 with OS4update4. It didn't render the walls, and monsters and items were not redrawn properly.
I hope other people had more luck with their Voodoo boards.
Kind regards,
Dennis zweedijk |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
A3000T
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 16-Mar-2006 21:10:16
| | [ #64 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 7-Nov-2003 Posts: 633
From: the Netherlands | | |
|
| @AmigaPapst
I bought a 2ndhand Radeon7500 (128MB, no brand) and did some more tests:
Radeon 7500: 640x480 - 105 fps 800x600 - 87 1024x768 - 57 1280x1024 - 55 1600x1200 - 42
Radeon 9250: 640x480 - 102 fps 800x600 - 85 1024x768 - 57 1280x1024 -55 1600x1200 - 32
The Radeon7500 is often faster than the Radeon 9250! It doesn't suffer from the inverted lighting problem I had with the Radeon9250, and the 2d image quality is much better.
Kind regards,
Dennis
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tuxedo
 |  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 16-Mar-2006 22:08:38
| | [ #65 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Nov-2003 Posts: 2351
From: Perugia, ITALY | | |
|
| @AmigaPapst
I got these values:
1280x1024: 38,1 - 55,8 (with gl_ztrick) 1024x768: 45.8 - 65.1 (gl_ztrick) 800x600: 69.2 - 83.9 (trick) 640x480: 79.1 - 90.9 (trick)
My config was:
A1SE G3@666 ATI Radeon 9250 with 256 DDR 128bit
Tuxedo.
P.S. Quake console closed(up)... Last edited by Tuxedo on 16-Mar-2006 at 10:12 PM.
_________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
amipal
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 17-Mar-2006 17:23:18
| | [ #66 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Apr-2003 Posts: 1907
From: Saltdean, East Sussex, UK | | |
|
| @AmigaPapst
I've knocked together this list to show some real-world averages. Each test was run five times to account for any tasks getting priority over Quake (like YAM downloading email for instance).
System: AmigaOne XE G4 512Mb, Radeon 7000 32Mb
Key: Standard: GL_Ztrick "0" and GL_Lockmode "Automatic" GL_Ztrick: GL_Ztrick "1" and GL_Lockmode "Automatic" GL_Lockmode: GL_Ztrick "0" and GL_Lockmode "Smart" All: GL_Ztrick "1" and GL_Lockmode "Smart"
--
640 x 480 Standard - 31.20 fps GL_Ztrick - 37.80 fps GL_Lockmode - 50.80 fps All - 68.87 fps
--
800 x 600 Standard - 24.10 fps GL_Ztrick - 30.40 fps GL_Lockmode - 34.80 fps All - 48.76 fps
--
1024 x 768 Standard - 15.30 fps GL_Ztrick - 20.60 fps GL_Lockmode - 19.20 fps All - 27.90 fps
:edit I'll add in 320 x 240 and 1280 x 1024 as soon as I have the results run. Last edited by amipal on 17-Mar-2006 at 05:23 PM.
_________________ After a decade away from the scene, I am back! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
amipal
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 22-Mar-2006 14:38:27
| | [ #67 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Apr-2003 Posts: 1907
From: Saltdean, East Sussex, UK | | |
|
| @all
Managed to grab a Saphire Radeon 9000 Pro 128Mb card off eBay for £13, so I'll install it and get more benchmarks posted.  _________________ After a decade away from the scene, I am back! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Crisot
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 24-Mar-2006 22:40:20
| | [ #68 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 25-Jan-2004 Posts: 163
From: France | | |
|
| Grumph... Just installed my 9000 pro.... Unable to reach more than 55 fps, 1280x960, with GL-ZTRICK 1... strange...
_________________ AmigaOne XE --- 7455A@1400 --- Radeon 9000 Pro --- RAM 2GB --- SSD 40GB |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
amipal
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 25-Mar-2006 17:45:46
| | [ #69 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 8-Apr-2003 Posts: 1907
From: Saltdean, East Sussex, UK | | |
|
| @Crisot
Did you try GL_LOCKMODE SMART as well?
Still need to do some tested on my 9000... _________________ After a decade away from the scene, I am back! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaPapst
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 28-Sep-2008 13:48:36
| | [ #70 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 2-Nov-2003 Posts: 637
From: Amigavatikan | | |
|
| @ 1280x960 = 65,2 fps with Update 4
With AmigaOS 4.1 1280x960 = 67,3 fps. AmigaOS 4.1 speeds up a little bit. 
@Max m3x Tretene It is possible to create a minigl 2.0 Version of Quake 1?
_________________ AmigaOne X1000 1,8 Ghz/2 GB Ram + Radeon 6670 2 GB + AmigaOS4.1 A4000T CyberstormPPC 604e-200Mhz/060/128MB+CybervisionPPC 8MB + AmigaOS4 and anymore other Amigas... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
 |  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 28-Sep-2008 14:39:08
| | [ #71 ] |
|
|
 |
Amiga Developer Team  |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4449
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| When ever I've run GLQuake it always runs really slowly for me.
When I do the timedemeo demo1 it gives about 37 fps.
But when I actually play I get a stream of errors on the console saying can't find GFX/ENV/SKY.TGA (or something similar) and it ruuns very slowly. Virtually stalling in the start map as you approach the episode slip gates, and then sometimes locking up.
After a reboot the screen often stays blank, requireing a hard reset to get everything back.
I have AmigaOne XE G4 with a radeon 7000 and OS4.1 (behaviour was the same inder 4.0)
I just gave up and always used the software version. Would be nice to get it working just for the principle of it though.
I have the latest version from OS4depot (archive date 15jun05)
[edit] I have ineterupts= YES inmy radeon icon [/edit]
Last edited by broadblues on 28-Sep-2008 at 02:40 PM.
_________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaPapst
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 2-Oct-2008 14:35:37
| | [ #72 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 2-Nov-2003 Posts: 637
From: Amigavatikan | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
broadblues
 |  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 2-Oct-2008 19:21:20
| | [ #73 ] |
|
|
 |
Amiga Developer Team  |
Joined: 20-Jul-2004 Posts: 4449
From: Portsmouth England | | |
|
| @AmigaPapst
I'm sure the slow performance is not solely down to the Radeon 7000 (obviousy it doesn't help though, can't afford to upgrade at present, maybe put it on my Christmas List)).
The errors reports displayed mus br slowing things down.
Other GL games run faster (D2X for instance).
_________________ BroadBlues On Blues BroadBlues On Amiga Walker Broad |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
AmigaPapst
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 6-Mar-2011 8:49:25
| | [ #74 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 2-Nov-2003 Posts: 637
From: Amigavatikan | | |
|
| I have tested the new version of glQuake 1.09b7: http://os4depot.net/index.php?function=showfile&file=game/fps/glquake.lha
Sorry but I cannot confirm that the new version is 10% faster. Problem with my configuration?
640x480= 109 fps 800x600= 97 fps 1024x768= 71 fps 1280x960= 64 fps 1600x1200= 48 fps
Please test it on your configuration and compare, thanks. _________________ AmigaOne X1000 1,8 Ghz/2 GB Ram + Radeon 6670 2 GB + AmigaOS4.1 A4000T CyberstormPPC 604e-200Mhz/060/128MB+CybervisionPPC 8MB + AmigaOS4 and anymore other Amigas... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Dwyloc
 |  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 6-Mar-2011 18:00:31
| | [ #75 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 30-Mar-2005 Posts: 1055
From: Glasgow, Scotland | | |
|
| @AmigaPapst
I dont know about 10% faster, but the second episode was unplayable jerky with the previous version of GLquake on my sam440ep now it runs smoothly.
As a result I spent a few hours playing it yesterday and today and I am very happy with this update. _________________ Sam440ep 667mhz, 512MB, 120GB 2.5" HD, OS4.1FE WinUae 3.0.0, OS 3.9, BB3, Catweasel MkIV Amiga 1200, Blizzard 040/40 (BlizzardPPC 060/200 with SCSI removed at present), mediatorSX pci, Voodoo3, PCI network card os 3.9BB2 4MB Minimig with ARM addon boar |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
DAX
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 6-Mar-2011 18:40:20
| | [ #76 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 30-Sep-2009 Posts: 2790
From: Italy | | |
|
| @Dwyloc m3x just posted a new re-compile on italian forums (Sam specific it would seem) 
_________________ SamFlex Complete 800Mhz System + AmigaOS 4.1 Update 4 Amiga 2000 DKB 2MB ChipRam GVP G-Force040 Picasso 2 OS3.9 BB2 AmigaCD 32 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
fricopal!
|  |
Re: How fast is GLQuake 1 with update4? Posted on 20-Mar-2025 2:37:59
| | [ #77 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 12-Mar-2025 Posts: 799
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Quote:
by ikir on 28-Feb-2006 18:38:46
@lionstorm
Quote: It looks like the best mode is 1024x768 with the 2 options but I suffer frequent mouse lock (USB mouse)
Same here! |
I understand that you're experiencing issues with your USB mouse getting locked frequently at a resolution of 1024x768. It seems to be an issue common among users, so we can look into possible solutions or workarounds for this problem together. What specific steps are causing the lock-up? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|