Click Here
home features news forums classifieds faqs links search
6162 members 
Amiga Q&A /  Free for All /  Emulation /  Gaming / (Latest Posts)
Login

Nickname

Password

Lost Password?

Don't have an account yet?
Register now!

Support Amigaworld.net
Your support is needed and is appreciated as Amigaworld.net is primarily dependent upon the support of its users.
Donate

Menu
Main sections
» Home
» Features
» News
» Forums
» Classifieds
» Links
» Downloads
Extras
» OS4 Zone
» IRC Network
» AmigaWorld Radio
» Newsfeed
» Top Members
» Amiga Dealers
Information
» About Us
» FAQs
» Advertise
» Polls
» Terms of Service
» Search

IRC Channel
Server: irc.amigaworld.net
Ports: 1024,5555, 6665-6669
SSL port: 6697
Channel: #Amigaworld
Channel Policy and Guidelines

Who's Online
22 crawler(s) on-line.
 95 guest(s) on-line.
 2 member(s) on-line.


 Yssing,  pavlor

You are an anonymous user.
Register Now!
 pavlor:  14 secs ago
 Yssing:  3 mins ago
 matthey:  8 mins ago
 Kronos:  10 mins ago
 Agafaster:  11 mins ago
 hlt:  18 mins ago
 _Steve_:  43 mins ago
 AmigaBlitter:  56 mins ago
 codis:  59 mins ago
 BigD:  1 hr 7 mins ago

/  Forum Index
   /  Amiga OS4 Software
      /  Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Register To Post

Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page )
PosterThread
Everblue 
Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:26:27
#1 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 24-Sep-2006
Posts: 679
From: Amigaland

I have grew up knowing the Amiga's operating system as 'WORKBENCH'. What happened after WB3.1 release? The workbench name was dropped in favour of the boring 'OS' name.

If I mention 'WORKBENCH' to real life friends who don't care about Amiga anymore, but used to own an A500 back in the days, they will start reminiscenting about how cool it was... Mention 'OS4' and I get blank looks.

Please bring Workbench back!

Last edited by Everblue on 13-Dec-2008 at 09:27 AM.

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rudei 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:29:42
#2 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 20-Nov-2002
Posts: 3589
From: Dallas, Texas

@Everblue

Real life friends? Would that imply also then that you have non-real life friends too?

Rude!

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Everblue 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:38:43
#3 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 24-Sep-2006
Posts: 679
From: Amigaland

@Rudei

Sorry English is not my first language. What I mean is friends at work, relatives, etc. Not people in Amiga forums, chat, etc. I did not want to offend anyone.

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
salass00 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:40:38
#4 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 31-Oct-2003
Posts: 2707
From: Finland

@Everblue

The way I see it:

Kickstart + Workbench = AmigaOS

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
thomas 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:40:59
#5 ]
Super Member
Joined: 28-May-2003
Posts: 1151
From: Germany

@Everblue

http://www.amigaforever.com/kb/15-108

_________________
Email: thomas-rapp@web.de
Home: thomas-rapp.homepage.t-online.de

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Everblue 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:43:29
#6 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 24-Sep-2006
Posts: 679
From: Amigaland

@thomas

Thanks for the link Thomas, very well explained.

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Al4 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:46:12
#7 ]
Regular Member
Joined: 28-Nov-2008
Posts: 339
From: Unknown


Workbench was what it was called when it came on 1-5 disks. Operating systems have become more serious things, much larger and more expensive. Imagine Workbench costing £80. Also, Workbench starts with the same letter as Windows...

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rudei 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:49:06
#8 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 20-Nov-2002
Posts: 3589
From: Dallas, Texas

@Everblue

Only kidding my friend, you're English is better than mine (and I'm English)
Now I feel guilty for thinking I've offended you! Apologies.

Rude!

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Everblue 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 9:50:09
#9 ]
Cult Member
Joined: 24-Sep-2006
Posts: 679
From: Amigaland

@Rudei

Ah ok :) No problems. I saw your signature and thought you were calling me rude! Haha.

What does it say on the top left corner when you install Amiga OS4.1 for the first time? Amiga Workbench or OS4?

Thanks!


PS I am from Malta.

Last edited by Everblue on 13-Dec-2008 at 09:50 AM.

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Rudei 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 10:12:57
#10 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 20-Nov-2002
Posts: 3589
From: Dallas, Texas

@Everblue

Ahh that's my sig - "Rude!" is "Rudei" with an upsidedown "i" - I post this on every response, I see how it can be confusing!

It says "Amiga OS4" I believe, but I think Workbench is mentioned when you click About (my OS4 machine isn't plugged in right now) from the menu...

Anyone running OS4 reading this to confirm?

Rude! (me)

_________________

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
TiredofLife 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 10:23:35
#11 ]
Super Member
Joined: 6-Jul-2005
Posts: 1704
From: Here

@Everblue

The part of the hd that contains AOS4 on my system, I have named Workbench.
I am a traditionlist.

Malta eh?
Went there twice for holidays as a youngster.
Got family over there as well.

Had a great time, it is a great place.
Will go back again at some point.

_________________
If your nose runs and your feet smell, you're upside down.

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
itix 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 11:29:35
#12 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 22-Dec-2004
Posts: 3398
From: Freedom world

@Everblue

Quote:

I have grew up knowing the Amiga's operating system as 'WORKBENCH'. What happened after WB3.1 release? The workbench name was dropped in favour of the boring 'OS' name.


AmigaOS was coined by Amiga Technologies but I dont know if they made it ever officially. It was just sort of adopted by Amiga users.

_________________
Amiga Developer
Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
NutsAboutAmiga 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 11:48:39
#13 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 9-Jun-2004
Posts: 12991
From: Norway

@Everblue

it's easy Workbench is part of AmigaOS,
in the same way X-Windows (X11) is part of Linux.

AmigaOS = Kickstart + AmigaDOS + Workbench
Redhat = Kernel + GNU utils + X11 + lots of stuff.

Amiga Computers loads the Kickstart (OS Kernel and hw drivers)
then AmigaDOS is started from disk
Then AmigaDOS execute the startup-sequence script
then AmigaDOS loads network drivers and monitor drivers,
then AmigaDOS execute the user-startup script
then AmigaDOS finally loads Workbench.

PC whit Linux.
The bootloader found in MBR loads the Linux kernel.
Then Linux kernel reads the boot disk and starts the Linux Console.
Then Linux console (sh) starts executing the init script.
Then Linux console (sh) loads kernel modules (drivers)
then Linux console (sh) starts network services.
Then Linux console (sh) loads X-Windows (X11)


Amiga Game boot sequence option 1:
Kickstart is loaded.
AmigaDOS is never started, game loads from bootblocks.

Amiga Game boot sequence option 2:
Kickstart is loaded
AmigaDOS is started.
Game is started from startup-sequence.
Workbench is never loaded.

Amiga Game boot sequence option 3
Kickstart is loaded
AmigaDOS is loaded.
Workbench is loaded.
you click on the game to start it.

Last edited by NutsAboutAmiga on 13-Dec-2008 at 11:53 AM.
Last edited by NutsAboutAmiga on 13-Dec-2008 at 11:49 AM.

_________________
http://lifeofliveforit.blogspot.no/
Facebook::LiveForIt Software for AmigaOS

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Hypex 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 11:55:44
#14 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 6-May-2007
Posts: 11351
From: Greensborough, Australia

@Everblue

That's because calling it Workbench is inaccurate. Although Workbench is what is usually presented to the user and what we usually run our apps from, Workbench is part of the OS, but it isn't the OS. Infact the OS technically could run without it. Boot into a shell and make use of it will show what I mean. Workbench needs the OS to be Workbench.

Of course, the OS by itself is meaningless. But, what I would call it, is AmigaOS4. And I usually use Workbench 4 on that same OS.

I do know what you mean. Other people also call it AmigaDOS. Which is also inaccurate. It is only part of the OS, one that handles file management. And considered to be an abomination to what was supposed to be the actual AmigaDOS.

OTOH, the Mac has the Finder, a strange name for a desktop that sounds more like a search engine. And Windows has it's desktop, which without, wouldn't be recognisable as Windows!

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
minator 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 14:42:49
#15 ]
Super Member
Joined: 23-Mar-2004
Posts: 1026
From: Cambridge

@Hypex

Quote:
That's because calling it Workbench is inaccurate. Although Workbench is what is usually presented to the user and what we usually run our apps from.


It's both accurate and inaccurate.

Back in the Commodore days the OS didn't really have a specific name so it was referred to as Worbench, the discs said workbench, the manuals said workbench, you could go out and buy a product called Workbench.

The original question was perfectly valid. The answer is rather sad, sometime back in the 90's Apple renamed their OS to MacOS, someone thought it trendy enough to copy it and it's been called AmigaOS ever since.

I personally thought Workbench to be a much better name.

_________________
Whyzzat?

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
marko 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 15:08:08
#16 ]
Super Member
Joined: 17-Dec-2007
Posts: 1816
From: Gothenburg, THE front side of Sweden ;), (via Finland), EU

@salass00

Quote:

The way I see it:

Kickstart + Workbench = AmigaOS

Me too.

_________________
AmigaOS 4.1 FEu2 on Sam440ep-flex 800MHz 1GB RAM
C128, A500+, A1200, A1200/40, AmigaForever 2008+09+16, 5 x86/x64 boxes
Still waiting (or dreaming) for the Amiga revolution...
m4rko.com/AMIGA

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
amigang 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 15:25:26
#17 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 12-Jan-2005
Posts: 2130
From: Cheshire, England

I liked the name Workbench and think it is a great name for an operating system, I wonder if it all right to use as a OS name or do Amiga own the rights to it? Just a thought if hyperion lost the ight to use Amiga, they could go to the workbench name.

_________________
AmigaNG, YouTube, LeaveReality Studio

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
pavlor 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 15:33:02
#18 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 10-Jul-2005
Posts: 9690
From: Unknown

@minator

According to the comp.sys.amiga, the name "Amiga OS" is unofficialy used at least since 1991/1992.

I found one thread from March 1991 mentioning "Amiga OS".
comp.sys.amiga.advocacy

You can find more than 100 posts containing phrase "Amiga OS" in later years (1992 etc.).

Last edited by pavlor on 13-Dec-2008 at 03:34 PM.

 Status: Online!
Profile     Report this post  
AmigaHeretic 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 16:45:14
#19 ]
Super Member
Joined: 7-Mar-2003
Posts: 1697
From: Oregon

@Everblue

Quote:

Everblue wrote:
@Rudei

What does it say on the top left corner when you install Amiga OS4.1 for the first time? Amiga Workbench or OS4?


Looking through the screen shot section at the all the OS4.x (Workbench4.x ) screenshots, it does indeed still say Workbench on the top left corner where it has always been.

Yeah, I have to agree with everybody. I think the AmigaOS is Kickstart + Workbench.

I the old days the rom stayed in the machine and you could more or less buy "just" the version of Workbench on disk with out chaning major OS components in ROM.


I think when people are conversing though the term "Workbench" is still very much in use today.

_________________
A3000D (16mhz, 2MB Chip, 4MB Fast, SCSI (300+MB), SuperGen Genlock, Kick 3.1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back in my day, we didn't have water. We only had Oxygen & Hydrogen, & we'd just shove 'em together

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Swoop 
Re: Why not call it Amiga Workbench 4.1 ?
Posted on 13-Dec-2008 20:30:40
#20 ]
Elite Member
Joined: 20-Jun-2003
Posts: 2163
From: Long Riston, East Yorkshire

@thomas

Quote:
http://www.amigaforever.com/kb/15-108

That's a great link.

_________________
Peter Swallow.
A1XEG3-800 [IBM 750FX PowerPC], running OS4.1FE, using ac97 onboard sound.

"There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don't."

 Status: Offline
Profile     Report this post  
Goto page ( 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page )

[ home ][ about us ][ privacy ] [ forums ][ classifieds ] [ links ][ news archive ] [ link to us ][ user account ]
Copyright (C) 2000 - 2019 Amigaworld.net.
Amigaworld.net was originally founded by David Doyle