| Poster | Thread | 
 Tuxedo 
   |   | 
Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 11-Jan-2015 19:33:10
 |  | [ #1 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 28-Nov-2003  Posts: 2352
 From: Perugia, ITALY |   |   |  
 |  
  | hi all, I've made a little tool in Hollywood to easly and simply tests AmigaOS4.x(and also all other Hollywood supported hardwares) capable hardwares...
  For ppls interested pls download the tool you like from
  https://app.box.com/s/u48rb9dqrbowiq29u4z1
  Thank you!
  PS HBT stands for Hollywood Benchmarking Tool ;)
 
 
  My results related to AmigaOS4.1Upd6 with Pegasos2 G4@1131 and Radeon9000 pro:
  CPU 1:  1547 CPU 2 :  9860 CPU 3:  4780 Graphics 1:  9403 Graphics 2 :  50 Graphics 3:  4039 Graphics 4:  4120
  Results related to MOS 3.7 with Pegasos2 G4@1131 and Radeon9000 pro:
  CPU 1:  654 CPU 2 :  4758 CPU 3:  CPU3:  2195 Graphics 1:  6815 Graphics 2 :  50 Graphics 3:  5001 Graphics 4:  5243
 
  Last edited by Tuxedo on 18-Jan-2015 at 11:35 PM.
  _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 lionstorm 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 11-Jan-2015 22:00:49
 |  | [ #2 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Super Member    | 
 Joined: 31-Jul-2003  Posts: 1594
 From: the french side |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo
  I got this on my A1XEG4@1266MHz+Radeon9000+AOS4.1upd6 (from RAM) :
  CPU 1:  1411 CPU 2 :  9119 CPU 3:  440 CPU 4:  4459 Graphics 1:  8741 Graphics 2 :  52 Graphics 3:  5115 Graphics 4:  5351
   |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Metalheart 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 11-Jan-2015 22:18:02
 |  | [ #3 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 21-Aug-2003  Posts: 2969
 From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains.... |   |   |  
 |  
  | SAM 460 1150 Mhz Radeon 4650 1280x850 32bit (OS4.1fe)
  With Odyssey running
  CPU 1:  564 CPU 2 :  5493 CPU 3:  264 CPU 4:  4931 Graphics 1:  16351 Graphics 2 :  205 Graphics 3:  3142 Graphics 4:  3693
  With mothing but CPU dock and WET running
  CPU 1:  554 CPU 2 :  5255 CPU 3:  253 CPU 4:  3847 Graphics 1:  13679 Graphics 2 :  199 Graphics 3:  3080 Graphics 4:  3586
 
  So.... is lower better or higher ??
  Last edited by Metalheart on 12-Jan-2015 at 11:03 AM. Last edited by Metalheart on 11-Jan-2015 at 10:24 PM. Last edited by Metalheart on 11-Jan-2015 at 10:21 PM. Last edited by Metalheart on 11-Jan-2015 at 10:19 PM.
  _________________ Theres a time to live and a time to die When its time to meet the maker Theres a time to live but isnt it strange That as soon as you're born you're dying  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 zzd10h 
   |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 6:41:44
 |  | [ #4 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Amiga Developer Team    | 
 Joined: 21-May-2012  Posts: 1077
 From: France |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo
  From RAM: on my X1000-OS4.1.6
  CPU 1:  386 CPU 2 :  3477 CPU 3:  116 CPU 4:  1399 Graphics 1:  4210 Graphics 2 :  44 Graphics 3:  2083 Graphics 4:  2219
  Lower is better ? _________________ http://apps.amistore.net/zTools  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Tuxedo 
   |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 6:44:42
 |  | [ #5 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 28-Nov-2003  Posts: 2352
 From: Perugia, ITALY |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Metalheart
  Lower is better the results was in milliseconds and the test have to be done with a clean start and maybe running it 5 times consecutively and calculating the mid value for each test.for better reading....
  Thank you!
  PS if someone with WinUAE will do the test,  thank you too! _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 itix 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 7:32:55
 |  | [ #6 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 22-Dec-2004  Posts: 3398
 From: Freedom world |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo
  Mac Mini G4@1500 MHz
  Quote:
   CPU 1:  495 CPU 2 :  3533 CPU 3:  165 CPU 4:  1624 Graphics 1:  6114 Graphics 2 :  34 Graphics 3:  3298 Graphics 4:  3323
  |  
 Last edited by itix on 12-Jan-2015 at 07:33 AM.
  _________________ Amiga Developer Amiga 500, Efika, Mac Mini and PowerBook  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Severin 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 10:54:23
 |  | [ #7 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 18-Aug-2003  Posts: 2740
 From: Gloucestershire UK |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo
  My X1000 in normal use, 32bit:  CPU 1:  545 CPU 2 :  4030 CPU 3:  82 CPU 4:  1837 Graphics 1:  5521 Graphics 2 :  47 Graphics 3:  2453 Graphics 4:  2393
  clean start:-  32bit: CPU 1:  525 CPU 2 :  4118 CPU 3:  82 CPU 4:  1788 Graphics 1:  5063 Graphics 2 :  47 Graphics 3:  2332 Graphics 4:  2265
  16bit: CPU 1:  536 CPU 2 :  3938 CPU 3:  80 CPU 4:  1778 Graphics 1:  5080 Graphics 2 :  46 Graphics 3:  1359 Graphics 4:  1488
  Last edited by Severin on 12-Jan-2015 at 11:07 AM.
  _________________ OS4 Rocks   X1000 beta tester, Sam440 Flex (733)
  Visit the Official OS4 Support Site for more help.
  It may be that your sole purpose is to serve as a warning to others.   |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Hypex 
   |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 12:18:38
 |  | [ #8 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 6-May-2007  Posts: 11351
 From: Greensborough, Australia |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo
  Does it benchmark the speed of Hollywood?  
  Not on my A1 but why does it report machines as having four CPUs?    |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Metalheart 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 12:52:52
 |  | [ #9 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 21-Aug-2003  Posts: 2969
 From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains.... |   |   |  
 |  
  | If lower is better does that mean that my SAM is faster then the X1000 ?? _________________ Theres a time to live and a time to die When its time to meet the maker Theres a time to live but isnt it strange That as soon as you're born you're dying  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Chain-Q 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 13:05:15
 |  | [ #10 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Cult Member    | 
 Joined: 31-Jan-2005  Posts: 825
 From: Budapest, Hungary |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo I tried to run it on my Efika with MorphOS, says Out of Memory in File: HBT.hws (current line: 40 - In function: AllocMem). I had about 64MB free, out of the 128 on the Efika. _________________ MorphOS, classic Amiga, demoscene, and stuff "When a bridge is not enough, build a Viaduct!" "Strip the Amiga community of speculation and we can fit every forum on a 720k floppy" (by resle)  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Spectre660 
   |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 13:29:26
 |  | [ #11 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 4-Jun-2005  Posts: 3918
 From: Unknown |   |   |  
 |  
  | Sam460ex AmigaOS 4.1 Update 6 .
  CPU 1:  487 CPU 2 :  3671 CPU 3:  284 CPU 4:  3408 Graphics 1:  12725 Graphics 2 :  216 Graphics 3:  3173 Graphics 4:  3700
  _________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Tuxedo 
   |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 13:39:49
 |  | [ #12 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 28-Nov-2003  Posts: 2352
 From: Perugia, ITALY |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Metalheart
  sorry but where your Sam was fater than x1000 in taht test?
  @Chain-Q
  was the third test...It allocs some mem and maybe it was too much for your setup...I'll se what I can do...
  I'll rework also the output values to get window output and also screen for android Hollywood player results... _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Metalheart 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 14:06:54
 |  | [ #13 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 21-Aug-2003  Posts: 2969
 From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains.... |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo
  Ah, well.... sorry... unfortunate misreading on my part     _________________ Theres a time to live and a time to die When its time to meet the maker Theres a time to live but isnt it strange That as soon as you're born you're dying  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Tuxedo 
   |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 14:14:15
 |  | [ #14 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 28-Nov-2003  Posts: 2352
 From: Perugia, ITALY |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Metalheart
  you hope that ;) _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Metalheart 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 15:40:59
 |  | [ #15 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 21-Aug-2003  Posts: 2969
 From: Somewhere in the Dutch mountains.... |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo
 
   Yeah, ah bit....
  Anyway I was just surprised, as it didnt seem correct. _________________ Theres a time to live and a time to die When its time to meet the maker Theres a time to live but isnt it strange That as soon as you're born you're dying  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 NutsAboutAmiga 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 19:29:51
 |  | [ #16 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 9-Jun-2004  Posts: 13034
 From: Norway |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Metalheart
  @Hypex
  Hemm. Maybe its test 1,2,3,4 not CPU 1,2,3,4.
  @MetalHeart
  Yes it's hard to understand what the test, says without a unit description. Caws per seconds, or is it the time it takes.
  > Anyway I was just surprised, as it didn't seem correct.
  Its most likely is not correct. http://www.amigans.net/modules/xforum/viewtopic.php?forum=25&topic_id=6749&order= A Sam460 almost able to play 720p videos, this the reports have from Sam460 users.
  An AmigaONE X1000 is able to play some 1080p videos with AltiVec, without AltiVec you can play 720p videos.
  However there are conditions where a Pegasus II beats an AmigaONE-X1000, Basilisk II benchmark I have seen this. 
  Last edited by NutsAboutAmiga on 12-Jan-2015 at 07:33 PM.
  _________________ http://lifeofliveforit.blogspot.no/ Facebook::LiveForIt Software for AmigaOS  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Tuxedo 
   |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 20:20:34
 |  | [ #17 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 28-Nov-2003  Posts: 2352
 From: Perugia, ITALY |   |   |  
 |  
  | @NutsAboutAmiga
  well... that was a asimply cpu test, mplayer test was for sure more complex... However depends also on wich 720p we are comparing, in hte thread ou linked x1000 was about 5 times fater than sam460... _________________ Simone"Tuxedo"Monsignori, Perugia, ITALY.  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 Tomppeli 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 21:03:39
 |  | [ #18 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Super Member    | 
 Joined: 18-Jun-2004  Posts: 1655
 From: Home land of Santa, sauna, sisu and salmiakki |   |   |  
 |  
  | @NutsAboutAmiga
  Quote:
  | Basilisk II benchmark I have seen this |  
  Any chance it's the same problem as with e-uae using illegal CPU instructions ?!_________________ Rock lobster bit me. My Workbench has always preferences. X1000 + AmigaOS4.1 FE "Anyone can build a fast CPU. The trick is to build a fast system." -Seymour Cray  |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 NutsAboutAmiga 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 21:17:58
 |  | [ #19 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 9-Jun-2004  Posts: 13034
 From: Norway |   |   |  
 |  
  |  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 | 
 pavlor 
  |   | 
Re: Amiga hw comparisons with HBT.... Posted on 12-Jan-2015 21:28:12
 |  | [ #20 ] |  
  | 
|
   |  
Elite Member    | 
 Joined: 10-Jul-2005  Posts: 9713
 From: Unknown |   |   |  
 |  
  | @Tuxedo
  Quote:
  | PS if someone with WinUAE will do the test, thank you too! |  
 
  Not enough memory... (82 MB free Fast RAM after startup). |  
  | 
|  Status: Offline | 
	 | 
 |