Poster | Thread |
jPV
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 3-Feb-2009 18:59:44
| | [ #41 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 11-Apr-2005 Posts: 833
From: .fi | | |
|
| Quote:
Stephen_Robinson wrote:
It's always fun trying to download a TCP/IP stack on a computer with no TCP/IP stack.
|
There's pretty many computers around where you can put couple of files to CD for example. Shouldn't be that hard to get TCP/IP stack transferred.
Quote:
Ditto trying to edit the user-startup with a text editor, and the lack of an installer were all problems that deeply effected the usability of MorphOS 1.4.5, all history now since the release of MorphOS 2.x, but I don't think it helps any to just brush aside people who had problems and were out off because of them. |
Nevertheless installing MorphOS 1.4.5 was way easier than building complete system with classic Amiga, which misses all kind of stuff more badly. I don't know how Amiga users have suddenly become so helpless when they've done similar things for decades. Or are you saying there's new users without Amiga experience? :)
Anyway you can still get 1.4.5 to pretty decent system as you can update original release with latest versions of MUI and Ambient etc._________________ - The wiki based MorphOS Library - Your starting point for MorphOS - Software made by jPV^RNO |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OS4_Gamer
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 3-Feb-2009 20:52:23
| | [ #42 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 22-Jan-2009 Posts: 27
From: Germany | | |
|
| dont chance the Workbench-Look. its the best GUI forever, simply and efficient!
i buy one of the last Pegs, but i sell it last Year because i can't go happy with Ambient.
_________________ A1-SE G3@733MHz, 1Gb RAM, Radeon9250, Sil0680, SB-Live 5.1 with OS4.0/4.1, Debian-Linux |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Chain-Q
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 3-Feb-2009 22:24:39
| | [ #43 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 31-Jan-2005 Posts: 824
From: Budapest, Hungary | | |
|
| @Zylesea Quote:
Since MorphOS 1.4 (or was it 1.3) MorphOS supports usb msd. |
Actually, it wasn't that easy, unfortunately, since 1.4.x didn't contain a FAT filesystem by default, you had to install the 68k FAT95 from Aminet. So plugging an USB stick by default didn't work... It was a trouble for me, when i got my Peg in early 2004 (damn, that was some time ago), and i had no blank CDs at home to burn, and also my Amiga only had SCSI, while the Peg only had IDE, so i couldn't even plug the HDD to transfer some stuff. And i didn't had a PC either. So i was screwed with a chicken & egg problem.
Luckily, some Peg1 owner living nearby helped me to get stuff on the Peg2, we plugged my IDE HDD into his machine, and copied the necessary addons... So i can perfectly understand people who complained about this. However, 2.x came out, so all people who are not talented enough to solve 1.4.x installation quirks, should get 2.x and then enjoy themselves. Period.
(2.x has a brand new PPC native FAT filesystem, and USB stack is configured by default to use it, so this is not true any more, of course. But since 2.x got a TCP/IP stack too, you don't need USB to transfer stuff... )_________________ MorphOS, classic Amiga, demoscene, and stuff "When a bridge is not enough, build a Viaduct!" "Strip the Amiga community of speculation and we can fit every forum on a 720k floppy" (by resle) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
 |  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 4-Feb-2009 13:53:48
| | [ #44 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11351
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @Ruud
Quote:
Who wants to be on my Purple team? |
Nice one! Pefect solution. Hope you win the $200,000. Hehe. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Fab
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 4-Feb-2009 14:20:06
| | [ #45 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 17-Mar-2004 Posts: 1178
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @OS4_Gamer
You're probably confused, because workbench itself doesn't really have any gui at all, except icon display itself (tho it's a bit better with latest version that at least got some kind of listview). Last edited by Fab on 04-Feb-2009 at 02:20 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
NutsAboutAmiga
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 4-Feb-2009 14:52:48
| | [ #46 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 9-Jun-2004 Posts: 12963
From: Norway | | |
|
| @Fab
GUI is short for graphical user interface.
Yes workbench is graphical, and does interface whit user. Windows, Icons, Screens, menus, Icons, background picture… every thing is graphical, even AmigaDOS is graphical.
MSDOS is none graphical, font size is fixed, and pixel based images can not be displays side by side of text consol.
_________________ http://lifeofliveforit.blogspot.no/ Facebook::LiveForIt Software for AmigaOS |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
 |  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 6-Feb-2009 15:16:16
| | [ #47 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11351
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @Fab
Quote:
If you are happy with it, you just register it. |
Does doing so cost money? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Hypex
 |  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 6-Feb-2009 15:20:10
| | [ #48 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 6-May-2007 Posts: 11351
From: Greensborough, Australia | | |
|
| @Stephen_Robinson
Quote:
It's always fun trying to download a TCP/IP stack on a computer with no TCP/IP stack. |
This makes me wonder. What the heck do you use for a network driver? If you have to use an emulated 68k tcp/ip stack there is not much chance it will have a driver the the Pegasos. Should be zero chance really. :-" |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Zylesea
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 6-Feb-2009 15:43:46
| | [ #49 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 16-Mar-2004 Posts: 2264
From: Ostwestfalen, FRG | | |
|
| @Hypex
Quote:
Hypex wrote:
This makes me wonder. What the heck do you use for a network driver? If you have to use an emulated 68k tcp/ip stack there is not much chance it will have a driver the the Pegasos. Should be zero chance really. :-" |
I don't remeber exactly where thE driver was, but I ran Miami jus rant fine for a couple of years on the Pegasos. Until MOSNet came out and replaced the Miami version I had. In the end I had my Pegasos online since ages (used it as main mailing maschine from early 2003 on - that's the oldest evidence for being online I actually have)._________________ My programs: via.bckrs.de MorphOS user since V0.4 (2001) |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Fab
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 6-Feb-2009 15:59:13
| | [ #50 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 17-Mar-2004 Posts: 1178
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Hypex 1.4 obviously came with native network drivers. A driver for integrated ethernet (via rhine) and for realtek 8139 too.
About registering 2.x, no, it's not free, but at least you can try it before buying it, which is the whole point. I don't think OS4 or its 4.1 update is free either, is it? :)
@NutsAboutAmiga Sure, but OS4_Gamer still seems seriously confused and likely confuses intuition (including skins), mui/reaction (with their default theme), and the desktop itself (ambient or workbench). You can't say there's something great about workbench GUI alone, since it just displays icons and menus and that's it basically. That's really the minimum any desktop can do (the problem is it's also the maximum in that case).
Last edited by Fab on 06-Feb-2009 at 04:00 PM. Last edited by Fab on 06-Feb-2009 at 03:59 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Gebrochen
 |  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 8-Feb-2009 11:10:56
| | [ #51 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 23-Nov-2008 Posts: 1441
From: Australia | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kicko
 |  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 8-Feb-2009 11:14:27
| | [ #52 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 19-Jun-2004 Posts: 5009
From: Sweden | | |
|
| Now is this boring or what ? Now when your father and my father is here. Let see who is stronger. Let the world know ? bah
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Simon
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 8-Feb-2009 11:57:11
| | [ #53 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 16-Feb-2005 Posts: 999
From: Antwerp / Belgium | | |
|
| Strange ... I tought that this topic was about comparing MOS2.2 and OS4.1 on a PEG2 . But apparently I have mistaken and it's about " my one is bigger than yours" ... am I on Amigaworld or in a kindergarden? GROW UP.
Last edited by Aminicle on 08-Feb-2009 at 11:57 AM.
_________________ - Proud Member Of The Belgian Amigaclub Since 2003 -
The Belgian Amiga Club on FACEBOOK !
The Belgian Amiga Club Website |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Stephen_Robinson
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 8-Feb-2009 13:50:35
| | [ #54 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 29-Apr-2005 Posts: 1991
From: UK | | |
|
| @Hypex
Intrestingly, or not, I just installed a demo copy of Windows 7 on my oldish AMD 2600+ PC, it did't install from the DVD, so I had to install over a copy of XP, got it working and found out it didn't have drivers for my network card, a standard onboard thing on a standard (can't remember which one, too lazy to check) Motherboard, so to get everything working I had to stick a spare old Reltek network card it so it could download the graphics card drivers etc. And that's a DVD install of 2/3 gigs.
Morphos had the drivers for the network card, not too suprising given the amount of hardware it runs on, but that wasn't the problem.
I'm sure I had a point when I started writting this, but, nope I forget.
Oh, yeah windblows is terrible.... _________________ Rage quited 29th May 2011 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomas
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 8-Feb-2009 13:54:58
| | [ #55 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Jul-2003 Posts: 4286
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Leo I would find such benchmarks interesting at least. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Fab
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 8-Feb-2009 14:23:19
| | [ #56 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 17-Mar-2004 Posts: 1178
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Tomas
Sure, let's benchmark q3 vs q3, mplayer vs dvplayer (or mplayer), mame vs xmame and so on. Should give interesting results. :) Last edited by Fab on 08-Feb-2009 at 02:23 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Kicko
 |  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 10-Feb-2009 17:08:43
| | [ #57 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 19-Jun-2004 Posts: 5009
From: Sweden | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
balis
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 10-Feb-2009 18:37:19
| | [ #58 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 22-Apr-2005 Posts: 139
From: Lille | | |
|
| @Fab
Have you any to show? I am really interested in how it compares.
Thanx m8.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Slayer
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 12-Feb-2009 19:09:23
| | [ #59 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 4-Jan-2005 Posts: 416
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @pavlor
Quote:
pavlor wrote: @Wol
Quote:
I think MorphOS will win... |
Maybe on morphzone.net... |
LOL
now that brightened my morning _________________ ~Yes I am a Kiwi, No, I did not appear as an extra in 'Lord of the Rings'~ 1x AmigaOne X5000 2.0GHz 2gM RadeonR9280X AOS4.x 3x AmigaOne X1000 1.8GHz 2gM RadeonHD7970 AOS4.x |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Slayer
|  |
Re: OS4 VS MorphOS on the same hardware Posted on 12-Feb-2009 19:20:55
| | [ #60 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 4-Jan-2005 Posts: 416
From: New Zealand | | |
|
| @Leo
Quote:
Leo wrote: Quote:
AmigaOS4.x is built on the actual source to AmigaOS. That's what makes it official.
|
Sure, but what do people prefer ? something official, or something better ? (I'm not implying MOS is better, I'm just wondering)... I mean: Amiga (the name) is now dead and burried... It just means nothing at all, and seeing how low it has gone, just isn't of any use today. So what's the point of having something "official" (as in based on original sources) ? |
AmigaOS is the only OS. You alternative OS using people would like nothing more than to think you can simply kill off the Amiga because it suits you. The AmigaOS is what made the 'Amiga' in anycase, the custom chips were needed in the earlier days to make the features of the OS a reality. Technology changes.
AmigaOS isn't going anywhere, it'll be here as always.
So what do I prefer? Something offical. People who have no patience also have no faith LOL so we who are offical are also with God _________________ ~Yes I am a Kiwi, No, I did not appear as an extra in 'Lord of the Rings'~ 1x AmigaOne X5000 2.0GHz 2gM RadeonR9280X AOS4.x 3x AmigaOne X1000 1.8GHz 2gM RadeonHD7970 AOS4.x |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|