Poster | Thread |
Robert
|  |
Re: Nedfield Posted on 11-Feb-2015 17:15:05
| | [ #101 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 10-Mar-2003 Posts: 879
From: Glasgow | | |
|
| @amigadave
Quote:
What do you call a group of 1,000 attorneys at the bottom of the Ocean? |
Pray, tell._________________ Robert -- A1XE G4, OS4.1. Peg1 G3, MOS 1.4. Abel Soul - Check out our tunes on Spotify |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
QuikSanz
|  |
Re: Nedfield Posted on 11-Feb-2015 17:41:08
| | [ #102 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 28-Mar-2003 Posts: 1236
From: Harbor Gateway, Gardena, Ca. | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
number6
|  |
Re: Nedfield Posted on 11-Feb-2015 21:50:14
| | [ #103 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Mar-2005 Posts: 11662
From: In the village | | |
|
| @amigadave
Quote:
I loved reading those comments by the judge, who was the witness, or do you know? |
Sure. Ben Van Wijhe, mentioned many times in this and other threads I've posted to concerning Commodore history.
It's interesting to note this was discussed in detail in 2011 between myself and Barry Altman:
Quote:
Eugene van Os is truly the white knight is this adventure. Do not believe anything that was reported in the recent SEC filings by Asiarim. There were outright lies and misinformation filed that is being corrected and hopefully investigated by the SEC as we speak. |
Source
As it turns out, Commodore did have a "new daddy", just as Barry said, whereas all the people calling the statement a lie...were, in fact, the liars here. (evil grin)
#6_________________ This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author. *Secrecy has served us so well* |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
number6
|  |
Re: Nedfield Posted on 7-Sep-2015 16:14:57
| | [ #104 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Mar-2005 Posts: 11662
From: In the village | | |
|
| @thread
Bah. Getting behind. Too many lawsuits to follow.
Regarding lawsuit described in post #99 this thread:
resolved
Quote:
ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the Court concludes that it lacks personal jurisdiction over the Petition against GBC Bank. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT C=Holdings's Petition is dismissed and the Restraining Notice is vacated. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. |
#6
_________________ This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author. *Secrecy has served us so well* |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
number6
|  |
Re: Nedfield Posted on 4-Jan-2016 15:08:30
| | [ #105 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Mar-2005 Posts: 11662
From: In the village | | |
|
| @thread
Since there have been many comments (mostly concerning the CommodoreSmart folks) in relation to C=Holdings B.V. not having a current website, I thought I would mention a link that just appeared:
http://www.tulip.com/
In itself a link to the name of the old Tulip company declared bankrupt (see earlier posts this thread) is odd, imo.
But it becomes a bit more odd I think when you see where the link comes from:
Quote:
If anyone who reads Dutch can confirm this is the same C=Holdings B.V. and this connection to Tulip, I'd appreciate it, although the history fits.
Source search
#6_________________ This posting, in its entirety, represents solely the perspective of the author. *Secrecy has served us so well* |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
number6
|  |
Re: Nedfield Posted on 4-Jan-2016 17:03:32
| | [ #106 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Mar-2005 Posts: 11662
From: In the village | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|