Poster | Thread |
Spectre660
 |  |
Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 14:49:55
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Benchmarks
Sam440ep-Flex 800 MHz
CPU Blowfish- 86.944 CPU CryptoHash -12.240 CPU Fibonacci -24.466 CPU N-Queens -64.646 FPU FFT - 88.107 FPU Raytracing -77.260
Last edited by Spectre660 on 30-Apr-2012 at 05:23 PM. Last edited by Spectre660 on 30-Apr-2012 at 03:08 PM.
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 14:51:56
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6472
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Spectre660
Are there the same benchmarks in AOS? To compare both... |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 15:05:15
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @OlafS25
No. The point is to compare Powerpc machines running Linux to Others running the same version of Linux
Quote:
OlafS25 wrote: @Spectre660
Are there the same benchmarks in AOS? To compare both... |
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 15:07:50
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| Benchmarks
AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ 1827Mhz
CPU Blowfish - 21.908 CPU CryptoHash - 56.497 CPU Fibonacci - 5.537 CPU N-Queens -14.117 FPU FFT -19.668 FPU Raytracing -28.871
Last edited by Spectre660 on 30-Apr-2012 at 05:25 PM. Last edited by Spectre660 on 30-Apr-2012 at 03:10 PM.
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 15:09:07
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6472
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Spectre660
I understand... You mean X1000/Sam... versus Macs |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 15:10:46
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @OlafS25
Yes and also compare with X86's.
Quote:
OlafS25 wrote: @Spectre660
I understand... You mean X1000/Sam... versus Macs |
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 15:17:58
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @OlafS25
The first two sets of results show that an Athlon xp2500 1.8 Mhz performs most of the benchmarks an average of 4.44 times faster than a Sam440ep-Fex 800mhz . With the exception of the FPU Raytrace at 2.68 time faster. with the range from 2.68 to 4.62 times faster .Which is almost 2x as fast per clock cycle.(1.97) Last edited by Spectre660 on 30-Apr-2012 at 03:19 PM.
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
OlafS25
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 15:22:53
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-May-2010 Posts: 6472
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Spectre660
From a logical point of view the PC should be 2.25 times faster (0.8 compared to 1.8). But there can be a lot of difference between mainboards that influence a benchmark. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 15:25:22
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1479
From: Italia | | |
|
| @Spectre660
X1000 now have another linux distros: Linux Mint, the same linux mint available for any platform. Will be very insteresting a day a compare between Linux Mint apps.
now i go to bechmarking Linux Mint with: Hardinfo, Lame, Mplayer e Blender with test.blen on 2 or 3 x86 sistem.
edit: unfortunately i cannot test linux mint on old pc because don't work in persistent mode but only in livel mode. on PC high-end works very well in persistent mode.. i'll post only result from E8500.. Last edited by Seiya on 30-Apr-2012 at 04:27 PM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 16:28:58
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| UPDATE:
Our family second fastest x86 (literally from the dumbster): Sempron 2500+ (1743Mhz, L1 64k+64k, 256kL2, bogomips 3486, DDR266) Basic Mint12 LXDE Smallerisbetter: Blow: 22 Fibo: 4,25 N-Q: 14,5 FFT: 32,3 Ray: 28,8 Biggerisbetter: Crypto: 60
Our nro1 x86 (y2008 computer) AMD64x2-3800+ (2Ghz, L1 64k+64k, L2 512k per core, bogomips 4018(per core), 3GB 667Mhz DDR2) (Basic Ubuntu 11.04, PinguyOS flavor) smallerbetter Blow: 10 Fibo: 4,3 NQ: 18,6 FFT: 9,0 Ray: 14 biggerbetter crypto: 115
Funny that while in real life this 3800+ runs circles around 2500+, it looses in Fibonancci test...
Last edited by KimmoK on 02-May-2012 at 04:28 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 02-May-2012 at 04:28 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 02-May-2012 at 04:27 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 02-May-2012 at 04:26 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 02-May-2012 at 04:24 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 30-Apr-2012 at 04:49 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 30-Apr-2012 at 04:42 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 30-Apr-2012 at 04:38 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 30-Apr-2012 at 04:36 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 30-Apr-2012 at 04:33 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 30-Apr-2012 at 04:32 PM. Last edited by KimmoK on 30-Apr-2012 at 04:31 PM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 17:29:28
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @Seiya
What your old PC ?. I did my pc test using a Live USB created with LinuxLive Usb Creator
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
NutsAboutAmiga
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 18:03:38
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 9-Jun-2004 Posts: 12960
From: Norway | | |
|
| @Spectre660
I don’t get it way are do you care how fast x86 is? If you really want a fast Linux machine then x86 is right hardware for you, but if you’re interested in AmigaOS4 the only option is PowerPC. If you were interested in compering different CPU’s then you should probably get some MIPS and ARM benchmarks as well.
_________________ http://lifeofliveforit.blogspot.no/ Facebook::LiveForIt Software for AmigaOS |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
elginseam
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 18:45:07
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
 |
Member  |
Joined: 14-May-2006 Posts: 10
From: London, UK | | |
|
| @Spectre660
Benchmarks
X1000 1.8GHz Memory 4024MB
CPU Blowfish- 60.153 CPU CryptoHash- 34.537 CPU Fibonacci- 15.048 CPU N-Queens- 24.536 FPU FFT- 17.418 FPU Raytracing- 40.995 _________________ A1000; A1200; A1500; Sam440ep; AmigaOne X1000 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 19:22:46
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @NutsAboutAmiga
I was trying to flush out some X1000 benchmarks . Looks like I have .

Quote:
NutsAboutAmiga wrote: @Spectre660
I don’t get it way are do you care how fast x86 is? If you really want a fast Linux machine then x86 is right hardware for you, but if you’re interested in AmigaOS4 the only option is PowerPC. If you were interested in compering different CPU’s then you should probably get some MIPS and ARM benchmarks as well.
| _________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Spectre660
 |  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 19:41:25
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Jun-2005 Posts: 3918
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @elginseam
It is interesting to see how the PowerPc machines fly when running Amiga OS 4.x when you do the comparison relative to the Linux benchmarks between X86 and PowePc .
_________________ Sam460ex : Radeon Rx550 Single slot Video Card : SIL3112 SATA card |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
pavlor
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 30-Apr-2012 21:30:24
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 10-Jul-2005 Posts: 9660
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @elginseam
Results of X1000 are really interesting. Some benchmarks in this suite (CPU CryptoHash, CPU N-Queens, FPU FFT) confirm results of other benchmarks/applications (Blender, lame etc.), other are a little bit strange (CPU Blowfish, FPU Raytracing).
SAM is in nearly all these benchmarks roughly 3-4 times slower than Athlon XP 2400+, PA6T show much greater variety (from nearly 1:1 - FPU FFT - to 1:3 - CPU Blowfish and CPU Fibonacci). Interesting. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 1-May-2012 0:14:09
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1479
From: Italia | | |
|
| hardfinfo give strange results lame and mplayer or blender in linux now to see :)
Last edited by Seiya on 01-May-2012 at 12:15 AM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
klx300r
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 1-May-2012 3:25:26
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 4-Mar-2008 Posts: 3857
From: Toronto, Canada | | |
|
| wonder if the X1000 figures are taking into account both cores with these benchmarks ?
_________________ ____________________________ c64-2sids, A1000, A1200T-060@50(finally working!),A4000-CSMKIII ! My Master Miggies- Amiga 1000 & AmigaOne X1000 ! mancave-ramblings X1000 I BELIEVE  |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Seiya
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 1-May-2012 9:23:40
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 19-Aug-2006 Posts: 1479
From: Italia | | |
|
| hardinfo with linux mint 12 on intel core2 duo E8500@3,16 Ghz, 4 GB DDR2 800, nvidia GTS250, Sound Blaster Audigy. Mesa 7.11 + Galliuim 0.4
CPU Blowfish: 7 CPU CryptoHash: 182 CPU Fibonacci: 2 CPU N-Queens: 7 FPU FFT: 2 FPU Raytracing: 14
Lame: 6s Mplayer: 18s Blender 2.58 (test.blend): (1 core): 00:40.81s (2 core): 00:25.40s
Last edited by Seiya on 01-May-2012 at 10:10 AM. Last edited by Seiya on 01-May-2012 at 09:25 AM.
_________________
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
KimmoK
|  |
Re: Debian Squeeze Hardinfo Benchmarks Posted on 1-May-2012 9:30:46
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 14-Mar-2003 Posts: 5211
From: Ylikiiminki, Finland | | |
|
| Trying to figure out those tests.. from above, Athlon vs sempron: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2500+ 1827Mhz CPU Blowfish - 21.908 CPU CryptoHash - 56.497 CPU Fibonacci - 5.537 CPU N-Queens -14.117 FPU FFT -19.668 FPU Raytracing -28.871 Sempron 2500+ (1743Mhz, L1 64k+64k, 256kL2, bogomips 3486, DDR266IIRC) Basic Mint12 LXDE Blow: 22 (bigger value seems better, but blowfish examples tell otherwise) Crypto: 60 (smaller value seems better) Fibo: 4,25 (bigger better) N-Q: 14,5 (smaller better) FFT: 32,3 (smaller better) Ray: 28,8 (???)
Sempron should be slower, right? Or perhaps my Sempron is based in a newer core, then... To figure it out, I could/should downclock my HW?
after seiyas latest post, now seems clear: CPU Blowfish: 7 smaller is better CPU CryptoHash: 182 bigger is better CPU Fibonacci: 2 smaller is better CPU N-Queens: 7 smaller is better FPU FFT: 2 smaller is better
Last edited by KimmoK on 01-May-2012 at 09:35 AM. Last edited by KimmoK on 01-May-2012 at 09:31 AM.
_________________ - KimmoK // For freedom, for honor, for AMIGA // // Thing that I should find more time for: CC64 - 64bit Community Computer? |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|