Poster | Thread |
wawa
|  |
what is your primary expectation of a contemporary amiga company to deliver (beyond what is currently available) Posted on 20-Dec-2011 15:07:37
| | [ #1 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| in order to get the current cusa proposition into some shape, or at least see what people in here would like to have as their current amiga system regardless available alternatives i open a small poll.
lets take it as an attempt to get some common denominator in this otherwise luckily individualistic scene.
let me say im not a genuine cusa supporter and take this rather as opportunity than that i actually expect them to stand up to their claims. but i think it doesnt hurt to know what we would most likely agree on. the poll will be sure to limited. feel free to make another, better one, at best controlled by a moderator who could extend it according to wishes.
so, choose, what do you want. note that multiple votes are possible.
edit: sorry treat the first poll option as both: custom keyboard and case choice, ive been to dumb to see how a poll hast to be set to start with.
edit2:
ah, guys please keep comments short or refrain from, if you want this poll to be any constructive.
but i think while choosing "nothing of the abvove" the most interesting would be to know what would you yourself consider an option (beyond if the reason is just not trusting cusa, because id like to go beyond discussion about that company, the poll may be as well an indication for other companies, as for what the community expects)
edit3:
further poll item suggestions:
-Support/Sponsor development/porting of missing CORE applications, like Office , 3D, Video Editing , etc (wajdy)
Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 05:16 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:47 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:39 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:20 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:20 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:13 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 03:45 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 03:24 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 03:16 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
CritAnime
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 15:12:03
| | [ #2 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 27-Jun-2011 Posts: 735
From: UK | | |
|
| |
Status: Offline |
|
|
jkirk
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 15:13:21
| | [ #3 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jan-2005 Posts: 3349
From: Georgia (usa) | | |
|
| @wawa
i voted none of the above because i would like to see the current os/mb companies supported through sales of complete systems thru cusa.
on an aside i would still like to see some progress on os4 for x86 based partially on aros to reduce development time.
example present: natami(or equivalent) in a600 case supporting os 1.3 to 3.1 sam 440/460 in a500/a1000 style case running os4 x1000 in a a2000 style case with os4 future: x86 itx mb in an a1200 case running x86 os4 x86 atx/matx mb in an a3000/4000 case running x86 os4 Last edited by jkirk on 20-Dec-2011 at 03:55 PM. Last edited by jkirk on 20-Dec-2011 at 03:52 PM. Last edited by jkirk on 20-Dec-2011 at 03:25 PM. Last edited by jkirk on 20-Dec-2011 at 03:23 PM.
_________________ Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wajdy
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 15:32:12
| | [ #4 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 27-Oct-2006 Posts: 191
From: Amigania | | |
|
| @wawa
Kindly add : Support/Sponsor development/porting of missing CORE applications, like Office , 3D, Video Editing , etc
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wawa
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 15:43:21
| | [ #5 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @wajdy seems i cannot modify this poll but take your note for the future consideration. thanks!
edit: noted your option on the initial. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:12 PM. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 03:48 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wajdy
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 15:54:15
| | [ #6 ] |
|
|
 |
Regular Member  |
Joined: 27-Oct-2006 Posts: 191
From: Amigania | | |
|
| @wawa Bounties and Aros are totally different |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
Tomas
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 15:57:11
| | [ #7 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 25-Jul-2003 Posts: 4286
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @wawa What i want is a more affordable os4.x compatible system but with something like natami or at least minimig for backwards compatibility/custom chipset support. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ddni
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 15:59:54
| | [ #8 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2007 Posts: 818
From: Northern Ireland | | |
|
| @wawa
This is a joke of a poll.
It is missing the ONLY option that I would consider choosing " CUSA should go and rot in a hole" _________________ AmigaOne X1000 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
jkirk
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 16:07:59
| | [ #9 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 28-Jan-2005 Posts: 3349
From: Georgia (usa) | | |
|
| @ddni
Quote:
because id like to go beyond discussion about that company, |
did you read this? if not please consider removing the comment from your post.Last edited by jkirk on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:09 PM.
_________________ Win•dows: n. A thirty-two bit extension and graphical shell to a sixteen-bit patch to an eight-bit operating system originally coded for a four-bit microprocessor which was written by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition. |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ddni
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 16:12:36
| | [ #10 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2007 Posts: 818
From: Northern Ireland | | |
|
| @jkirk
I will not remove my post.
The thread is titled CUSA proposition. At some point in the future, it will be dug up by some CUSA fan boy who will claim "look what the community want CUSA to do" This being the case I want my choice to be represented. _________________ AmigaOne X1000 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wawa
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 16:14:44
| | [ #11 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @wajdy
Quote:
Bounties and Aros are totally different
|
you are right, especially it could influence this poll in favour of aros. i knew im aros biased, forgive me ;) remark removed again! Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:15 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wawa
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 16:22:50
| | [ #12 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ddni
Quote:
At some point in the future, it will be dug up by some CUSA fan boy who will claim "look what the community want CUSA to do"
|
look at it from this side: if someone digs it up and cusa doesnt deliver it can be used against them.
adjusted the poll title, hope more to your liking. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:23 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ddni
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 16:26:40
| | [ #13 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2007 Posts: 818
From: Northern Ireland | | |
|
| @wawa
Don't be offended, but I will abstain from this poorly constructed poll. _________________ AmigaOne X1000 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
wawa
|  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 16:30:54
| | [ #14 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 21-Jan-2008 Posts: 6259
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ddni
right, has been done in hurry and cannot now be better adjusted, if you are not satisfied you can make a proposition what shoud be changed in the future or stay away. no offence. Last edited by wawa on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:33 PM.
|
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ddni
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 16:31:34
| | [ #15 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2007 Posts: 818
From: Northern Ireland | | |
|
| @wawa
Thanks Wawa, sums things up perfectly. Not going away though  Last edited by ddni on 20-Dec-2011 at 04:32 PM.
_________________ AmigaOne X1000 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 17:34:41
| | [ #16 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3725
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @ddni
Quote:
9. If Commodore USA does not perform the required work in 6 months of the project commencement date, then the 500+ customers have the option to withdraw immediately for a full refund of their prepayment. 14. In the meantime, Commodore USA will potentially continue with its current x86 based Commodore AMIGA plans, that will co-exist with the community's desired Commodore AMIGA branded product/s. |
Six months you play, while they conquer with the "clone wars"_________________ Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
damocles
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 17:37:04
| | [ #17 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 22-Dec-2007 Posts: 1719
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ddni
Quote:
It is missing the ONLY option that I would consider choosing " CUSA should go and rot in a hole" |
I guess haters have to hate.
_________________ Dammy |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
ddni
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 17:42:40
| | [ #18 ] |
|
|
 |
Cult Member  |
Joined: 11-Jan-2007 Posts: 818
From: Northern Ireland | | |
|
| @damocles
lol so true and sheep gotta be sheep _________________ AmigaOne X1000 |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
damocles
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 18:00:18
| | [ #19 ] |
|
|
 |
Super Member  |
Joined: 22-Dec-2007 Posts: 1719
From: Unknown | | |
|
| @ddni
Quote:
lol so true and sheep gotta be sheep |
Let us not drag Fleecy into this thread.
_________________ Dammy |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|
vox
 |  |
Re: cusa proposition Posted on 20-Dec-2011 18:20:55
| | [ #20 ] |
|
|
 |
Elite Member  |
Joined: 12-Jun-2005 Posts: 3725
From: Belgrade, Serbia | | |
|
| @ddni
Quote:
This is a joke of a poll. It is missing the ONLY option that I would consider choosing " CUSA should go and rot in a hole" |
Its interesting to see that this forum is Amiga Inc. offshoot forum :) Just to know ...
Its interesting that people DO BELIEVE what ..? That CUSA can:
- actually develop system? - Order from their factories in China if get 500 preorders - Improve existing OS4 / AROS-Natami / MOS products? - Have alliance wih Hyperion/Acube based on joint product Hyperion was never asked for? - Buy existing Amiga product and rebrand it? Which product? And you would again pay more for re-brand?
Its not only a problem that "Community" is not single minded with the plan, seems neither CUSA is.
The magic question is "what product is"
At the other hand, don`t mind that CUSA will NOT change its way on making its own Amiga line and advertising it.
Making community project secured by community is nothing to lose tactics, while you will not be able to object their main product line that meanwhile goes for advertising, while this project gets NDA. If 500 preorders fails, its the community "is wrong". As CUSA is company that neither designs hardware or software, what can we believe is that they can rebrand existing products as usual.
Short - many obstacles, little chances of success, win-win of CUSA
* * *
Without this: Natami is closer then ever MOS 3.x supports more Macs AmigaOS 4 gets low end and high end hardware next year
Where would be place for new products?
Would it have any effect beside "healing relations wits CUSA"Last edited by vox on 20-Dec-2011 at 06:28 PM.
_________________ Future Acube and MOS supporter, fi di good, nothing fi di unprofessionals. Learn it harder way! |
|
Status: Offline |
|
|